H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Ilya Ivashka vs Thomas Fabbiano H2H: 2-0
Ilya Ivashka holds a 2–0 lead over Thomas Fabbiano in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ilya Ivashka leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ilya Ivashka won the 2019 Miami Masters first round 6-4 1-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Belarus
Age 32
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2019* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Ilya Ivashka | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | Thomas Fabbiano | Match data |
| Feb 7, 2019* | Montpellier | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Ilya Ivashka | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Thomas Fabbiano | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ilya Ivashka | #791 | #40 | 1,370 | 1,951 | 78 | 83 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Thomas Fabbiano | #1,768 | #70 | 715 | 1,748 | 27 | 62 | 30.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ilya Ivashka | Thomas Fabbiano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #371 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2018 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #91 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #131 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #108 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #48 | 1,914 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #73 | 1,826 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #73 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #114 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |