H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ion Tiriac vs Haroon Rahim H2H: 1-1
Ion Tiriac and Haroon Rahim are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ion Tiriac leads 1–0 on carpet, while Haroon Rahim leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Haroon Rahim won the 1972 Jacksonville fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 87
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
PAK
Age 76
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 1973* | Jacksonville | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Haroon Rahim | 6-4 6-4 | Ion Tiriac | Match data |
| Feb 17, 1972* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Ion Tiriac | 7-6 6-3 | Haroon Rahim | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ion Tiriac | #439 | #55 | 0 | 1,899 | 228 | 190 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Haroon Rahim | #130 | #34 | 0 | 1,855 | 148 | 176 | 45.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ion Tiriac | Haroon Rahim | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 17–17 | 50.0% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 32–38 | 45.7% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 20–34 | 37.0% | #90 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #123 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #74 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #49 | 1,807 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1968 | 60–12 | 83.3% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1969 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1970 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1971 | 27–16 | 62.8% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1972 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1973 | 35–35 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,683 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1974 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,622 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1975 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #138 | 1,589 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1976 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #248 | 1,534 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1977 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,633 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1978 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #263 | 1,523 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1979 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #439 | 1,525 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |