H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Ivan Dodig vs Frank Dancevic H2H: 1-0

Ivan Dodig holds a 1–0 lead over Frank Dancevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ivan Dodig leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ivan Dodig won the 2012 Queen's Club Championships first round 6-1 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivan Dodig
CRO Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Frank Dancevic
CAN Age 41 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ivan Dodig #69 6-1 (ret.) Frank Dancevic #121 Match data Jun 13, 2012* R64 Queen's Club Championships ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ivan Dodig #423 #29 1,330 1,966 115 132 46.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Frank Dancevic #406 #65 783 1,771 54 90 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Dodig Frank Dancevic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2002 1–2 33.3% — 1,505 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% #201 1,497 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2004 1–2 33.3% #171 1,486 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2005 2–6 25.0% #188 1,472 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2006 6–9 40.0% #88 1,557 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2007 16–18 47.1% #72 1,696 0 0
23 2008 0–1 0.0% #422 1,508 0 0 2008 6–11 35.3% #130 1,652 0 0
24 2009 2–2 50.0% #180 1,546 0 0 2009 9–11 45.0% #143 1,698 0 0
25 2010 7–7 50.0% #88 1,724 0 0 2010 2–3 40.0% #269 1,663 0 0
26 2011 26–23 53.1% #36 1,776 0 1 2011 2–6 25.0% #151 1,696 0 0
27 2012 15–22 40.5% #72 1,783 0 1 2012 1–5 16.7% #165 1,604 0 0
28 2013 32–24 57.1% #33 1,918 0 1 2013 2–3 40.0% #122 1,687 0 0
29 2014 15–23 39.5% #95 1,758 0 1 2014 2–6 25.0% #149 1,654 0 0
30 2015 8–11 42.1% #87 1,668 0 1 2015 0–3 0.0% #209 1,601 0 0
31 2016 7–16 30.4% #147 1,571 0 1 2016 3–3 50.0% #241 1,663 0 0
32 2017 3–2 60.0% #336 1,607 0 1 2017 1–1 50.0% #363 1,658 0 0
40 2025 0–1 0.0% — 1,573 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ivan Dodig Frank Dancevic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
24 2009 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
25 2010 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2011 17 14 31 54.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2011 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2012 10 12 22 45.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2013 20 16 36 55.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 11 17 28 39.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2014 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 2015 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2016 2 10 12 16.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2016 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 2017 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
40 2025 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 85 158 46.2% 25 32 57 43.9% 17 15 32 53.1% — — — — — 32 61 93 34.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 21 23 44 47.7% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 245/246 of Ivan Dodig's and 143/144 of Frank Dancevic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ivan Dodig Frank Dancevic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 3/3 6.7 3.7 49.8% 68.8% 44.1% 52.2% 45.1% 56.5% 29.6%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/1 8.0 5.0 49.1% 73.1% 44.4% 69.2% 30.8% 58.5% 36.4%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 3/3 3.0 3.0 63.1% 75.9% 37.7% 39.9% 14.3% 61.5% 29.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 8/8 6.1 2.3 57.1% 66.2% 48.8% 55.0% 26.3% 58.1% 34.5%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 15/15 6.3 1.3 62.8% 70.9% 52.0% 60.1% 37.9% 64.0% 34.1%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 34/34 12.4 2.5 60.2% 75.4% 52.3% 59.8% 38.5% 66.0% 34.1%
23 2008 1/1 1.0 0.0 56.6% 70.0% 34.8% 40.0% — 54.7% 24.5% 2008 16/17 9.4 2.1 61.3% 73.3% 51.1% 65.5% 37.9% 64.5% 32.8%
24 2009 4/4 5.5 2.5 52.2% 69.3% 49.8% 56.0% 53.8% 59.6% 36.0% 2009 20/20 7.5 1.6 60.8% 74.2% 54.4% 56.4% 38.6% 66.5% 31.5%
25 2010 14/14 8.6 3.2 57.0% 73.5% 52.2% 55.5% 51.3% 64.5% 39.5% 2010 5/5 8.4 2.8 56.2% 75.4% 49.5% 63.0% 34.7% 63.8% 32.3%
26 2011 49/49 7.6 3.1 58.3% 70.5% 49.5% 58.8% 40.1% 61.9% 35.9% 2011 8/8 10.5 3.1 58.6% 68.7% 50.2% 52.8% 27.1% 60.8% 29.8%
27 2012 36/37 8.2 3.5 57.4% 72.1% 47.9% 59.4% 35.2% 61.7% 37.0% 2012 6/6 4.7 2.8 55.1% 61.7% 41.1% 49.4% 45.8% 52.1% 20.7%
28 2013 56/56 9.3 3.0 58.6% 75.1% 54.1% 61.4% 45.5% 66.5% 38.4% 2013 5/5 9.6 2.8 62.4% 69.0% 48.7% 61.0% 40.8% 61.5% 35.4%
29 2014 38/38 8.5 3.4 57.9% 74.4% 49.5% 57.5% 42.1% 63.9% 35.2% 2014 8/8 7.1 3.9 58.2% 67.9% 46.4% 51.2% 34.5% 58.9% 29.1%
30 2015 19/19 8.7 3.0 59.4% 74.5% 53.9% 57.0% 45.5% 66.3% 37.9% 2015 3/3 5.3 3.0 59.3% 71.1% 43.1% 55.0% 33.3% 59.6% 28.3%
31 2016 23/23 8.0 3.6 59.8% 69.3% 48.5% 59.3% 47.9% 60.9% 33.9% 2016 6/6 6.3 1.7 62.1% 74.2% 56.7% 71.1% 24.7% 67.9% 30.5%
32 2017 5/5 5.4 5.8 62.0% 70.2% 44.5% 53.9% 34.3% 60.7% 39.9% 2017 2/2 5.0 2.0 65.2% 76.9% 44.3% 50.0% 22.2% 65.7% 26.6%
Career — 245/247 8.3 3.3 58.3% 72.8% 50.6% 58.8% 42.6% 63.5% 36.7% — 143/144 8.6 2.3 59.9% 72.1% 50.4% 58.3% 35.7% 63.4% 31.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ivan Dodig Frank Dancevic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1506 104.6 +0.04 -3.24 0.682 44.0% +22 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — +0.04
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1497 102.3 +2.47 -1.76 0.878 47.4% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.06
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1486 103.8 -0.52 -3.23 0.760 44.9% — — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.16
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1473 101.3 -2.56 -1.42 0.825 46.8% +33 — — 27.8% -1.28 1–1 1–1 — +0.82
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1558 120.1 +0.72 -1.24 0.948 48.9% -17 — +44 46.2% -0.31 2–6 (25%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.23
22 2007 1495 106.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1697 136.2 +2.37 -1.18 1.003 49.7% -6 — -95 48.4% -0.16 8–8 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.87
23 2008 1509 106.8 +4.34 +3.57 0.541 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.29 2008 1653 126.4 +1.17 -2.13 0.925 49.7% -7 — +11 44.7% -0.34 2–5 (29%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.19
24 2009 1546 117.4 -1.85 +0.71 0.891 48.0% +60 — — 50.0% -0.75 — 1–0 — -0.48 2009 1699 134.9 +1.81 -2.41 0.940 48.8% +28 — +6 43.5% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.65
25 2010 1724 125.3 +0.48 +1.37 1.113 52.2% +20 — — 52.9% +0.18 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.08 2010 1663 112.5 -0.81 -0.02 0.891 48.2% — — +83 50.0% -0.42 0–2 3–0 (100%) — -0.03
26 2011 1777 150.6 -0.35 -0.75 0.941 49.0% +49 -206 -91 49.6% -0.25 12–4 (75%) 13–6 (68%) — -1.33 2011 1696 122.6 -2.16 -3.36 0.759 45.7% +7 — — 36.4% -0.95 1–2 (33%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.72
27 2012 1784 142.5 -1.17 -0.16 0.965 49.4% +59 -235 -120 40.4% -0.53 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) — +0.32 2012 1605 113.3 -3.12 -6.61 0.432 37.6% +71 — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.47
28 2013 1919 160.6 +2.92 +2.62 1.146 52.4% -16 -288 -73 54.7% +0.35 8–10 (44%) 11–14 (44%) — -2.81 2013 1688 118.1 -0.19 -0.40 0.918 48.5% +6 — — 43.8% -0.44 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.09
29 2014 1758 150.7 -0.20 -0.49 0.977 49.6% -2 -88 — 44.6% +0.02 6–6 (50%) 7–13 (35%) — +1.01 2014 1655 115.5 -2.84 -3.79 0.710 44.6% +4 — — 33.3% -1.37 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12
30 2015 1668 137.9 +1.03 +1.07 1.123 51.4% +16 -3 — 47.9% +0.08 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.31 2015 1602 110.2 -0.20 -3.32 0.701 44.7% +41 — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — +0.04
31 2016 1572 126.0 -1.95 -1.62 0.867 47.8% -29 +124 +224 40.7% -0.70 2–6 (25%) 7–4 (64%) — +0.02 2016 1663 114.3 -0.72 -0.87 0.948 49.4% — — +100 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.11
32 2017 1607 117.9 -1.14 +0.70 1.014 50.1% — +110 — 53.8% -0.15 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.39 2017 1658 105.5 -0.71 -1.04 0.776 46.9% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.57
33 2018 1593 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1596 104.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1590 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1577 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2025 1573 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1967 146.6 +0.28 +0.40 1.007 50.2% +16 -119 -48 47.8% -0.12 39–39 (50%) 56–50 (53%) 103.4 -1.03 — 1772 127.2 +0.40 -2.03 0.872 47.8% +8 — +18 41.8% -0.57 23–32 (42%) 38–34 (53%) 98.0 +1.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.