H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Ivan Dodig vs Ivan Navarro H2H: 1-0
Ivan Dodig holds a 1–0 lead over Ivan Navarro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ivan Dodig leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ivan Dodig won the 2010 Umag third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2010 | Tokyo | ATP 500 | Q2 | Hard | Ivan Dodig | 6-4 6-2 | Ivan Navarro | Match data |
| Jul 29, 2010* | Umag | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ivan Dodig | 6-3 6-4 | Ivan Navarro | Match data |
| Apr 6, 2010* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | Q3 | Clay | Ivan Navarro | 5-7 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | Ivan Dodig | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Dodig | #423 | #29 | 1,330 | 1,964 | 114 | 129 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ivan Navarro | #1,929 | #67 | 1,108 | 1,627 | 35 | 65 | 35.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ivan Dodig | Ivan Navarro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #422 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #138 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #128 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #124 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #74 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #127 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #193 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #95 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #87 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #231 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2016 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #147 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #336 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |