H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Ivan Dodig vs Lukas Lacko H2H: 1-0

Ivan Dodig holds a 1–0 lead over Lukas Lacko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ivan Dodig leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ivan Dodig won the 2013 Miami Open first round 4-6 6-0 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivan Dodig
CRO Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Lukas Lacko
SVK Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ivan Dodig #54 4-6 6-0 6-4 Lukas Lacko #81 Match data Mar 22, 2013* R128 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Lukas Lacko #217 6-1 3-6 7-6(4) Ivan Dodig #196 Match data Jun 8, 2009 Q2 Q Halle Open ATP 250 Grass

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ivan Dodig #423 #29 1,330 1,966 115 132 46.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lukas Lacko #1,505 #44 917 1,838 81 135 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Dodig Lukas Lacko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2007 0–2 0.0% #139 1,499 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #325 1,480 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2009 1–3 25.0% #82 1,607 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2010 16–21 43.2% #89 1,669 0 0
23 2008 0–1 0.0% #422 1,508 0 0 2011 4–7 36.4% #112 1,670 0 0
24 2009 2–2 50.0% #180 1,546 0 0 2012 12–19 38.7% #51 1,644 0 0
25 2010 7–7 50.0% #88 1,724 0 0 2013 11–16 40.7% #81 1,667 0 0
26 2011 26–23 53.1% #36 1,776 0 1 2014 11–17 39.3% #94 1,733 0 0
27 2012 15–22 40.5% #72 1,783 0 1 2015 2–12 14.3% #110 1,647 0 0
28 2013 32–24 57.1% #33 1,918 0 1 2016 4–7 36.4% #122 1,682 0 0
29 2014 15–23 39.5% #95 1,758 0 1 2017 7–10 41.2% #92 1,740 0 0
30 2015 8–11 42.1% #87 1,668 0 1 2018 11–16 40.7% #114 1,677 0 0
31 2016 7–16 30.4% #147 1,571 0 1 2019 1–3 25.0% #183 1,579 0 0
32 2017 3–2 60.0% #336 1,607 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — 2021 1–1 50.0% #190 1,497 0 0
40 2025 0–1 0.0% — 1,573 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ivan Dodig Lukas Lacko
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2009 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2010 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2013 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2011 17 14 31 54.8% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2012 10 12 22 45.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2015 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 2013 20 16 36 55.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2014 11 17 28 39.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 2017 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
30 2015 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2018 6 13 19 31.6% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5%
31 2016 2 10 12 16.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2017 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
40 2025 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 85 158 46.2% 25 32 57 43.9% 17 15 32 53.1% — 60 95 155 38.7% 2 14 16 12.5% 19 26 45 42.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 245/246 of Ivan Dodig's and 215/216 of Lukas Lacko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ivan Dodig Lukas Lacko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 3.0 3.0 58.5% 59.7% 48.3% 32.1% 8.3% 55.0% 22.6%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 8.0 7.0 54.5% 70.9% 47.0% 64.7% 28.6% 60.0% 31.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 4/4 5.5 2.0 64.4% 71.7% 48.3% 67.5% 21.5% 63.4% 24.6%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 37/37 6.7 2.6 58.6% 72.6% 50.4% 55.4% 41.7% 63.4% 36.0%
23 2008 1/1 1.0 0.0 56.6% 70.0% 34.8% 40.0% — 54.7% 24.5% 2011 11/11 6.2 3.4 57.9% 66.4% 48.8% 61.5% 49.0% 59.2% 32.9%
24 2009 4/4 5.5 2.5 52.2% 69.3% 49.8% 56.0% 53.8% 59.6% 36.0% 2012 30/31 6.3 2.0 60.2% 68.3% 49.2% 50.9% 38.9% 60.9% 34.2%
25 2010 14/14 8.6 3.2 57.0% 73.5% 52.2% 55.5% 51.3% 64.5% 39.5% 2013 27/27 5.7 2.8 57.8% 68.4% 48.1% 53.4% 37.5% 59.7% 35.6%
26 2011 49/49 7.6 3.1 58.3% 70.5% 49.5% 58.8% 40.1% 61.9% 35.9% 2014 28/28 4.9 2.6 57.9% 72.2% 50.4% 46.3% 46.3% 63.1% 33.4%
27 2012 36/37 8.2 3.5 57.4% 72.1% 47.9% 59.4% 35.2% 61.7% 37.0% 2015 14/14 7.6 2.4 60.6% 66.1% 48.3% 52.4% 18.2% 59.5% 28.3%
28 2013 56/56 9.3 3.0 58.6% 75.1% 54.1% 61.4% 45.5% 66.5% 38.4% 2016 11/11 5.7 3.3 56.9% 69.7% 49.9% 52.4% 53.8% 60.8% 31.2%
29 2014 38/38 8.5 3.4 57.9% 74.4% 49.5% 57.5% 42.1% 63.9% 35.2% 2017 17/17 7.2 2.2 57.4% 74.0% 56.2% 58.3% 35.3% 65.9% 33.4%
30 2015 19/19 8.7 3.0 59.4% 74.5% 53.9% 57.0% 45.5% 66.3% 37.9% 2018 27/27 8.0 3.1 57.1% 74.5% 51.2% 48.5% 37.5% 64.4% 34.5%
31 2016 23/23 8.0 3.6 59.8% 69.3% 48.5% 59.3% 47.9% 60.9% 33.9% 2019 4/4 5.3 2.3 61.2% 71.4% 49.5% 68.5% 8.3% 62.5% 28.2%
32 2017 5/5 5.4 5.8 62.0% 70.2% 44.5% 53.9% 34.3% 60.7% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 2/2 4.0 1.5 62.4% 71.8% 63.0% 62.5% 16.7% 68.7% 32.3%
Career — 245/247 8.3 3.3 58.3% 72.8% 50.6% 58.8% 42.6% 63.5% 36.7% — 215/216 6.4 2.6 58.5% 70.7% 50.3% 53.0% 38.2% 62.2% 33.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ivan Dodig Lukas Lacko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1483 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1499 101.9 +1.81 -2.71 0.502 39.5% — — — 16.7% -2.67 — — — +0.02
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1480 94.2 -0.69 -1.07 0.779 46.8% — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.29
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1607 112.9 -1.36 -0.52 0.671 46.0% — — +49 30.0% -0.80 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.10
22 2007 1495 106.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1670 135.5 +0.10 -0.24 0.982 49.4% -21 -170 -17 45.5% -0.57 6–12 (33%) 15–6 (71%) — -0.83
23 2008 1509 106.8 +4.34 +3.57 0.541 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.29 2011 1670 132.6 -1.32 -1.02 0.806 46.9% +1 — — 37.5% -0.75 3–3 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.54
24 2009 1546 117.4 -1.85 +0.71 0.891 48.0% +60 — — 50.0% -0.75 — 1–0 — -0.48 2012 1644 139.6 -1.32 -1.68 0.874 47.5% +20 -213 +119 38.6% -0.76 6–3 (67%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.47
25 2010 1724 125.3 +0.48 +1.37 1.113 52.2% +20 — — 52.9% +0.18 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.08 2013 1668 139.8 -2.67 -1.18 0.882 47.9% +30 — — 45.6% -0.69 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.64
26 2011 1777 150.6 -0.35 -0.75 0.941 49.0% +49 -206 -91 49.6% -0.25 12–4 (75%) 13–6 (68%) — -1.33 2014 1734 137.9 -0.40 -1.90 0.904 48.4% +3 — -21 39.4% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.19
27 2012 1784 142.5 -1.17 -0.16 0.965 49.4% +59 -235 -120 40.4% -0.53 8–6 (57%) 11–6 (65%) — +0.32 2015 1648 120.8 -3.25 -3.69 0.699 44.0% -38 — +63 26.2% -1.62 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.16
28 2013 1919 160.6 +2.92 +2.62 1.146 52.4% -16 -288 -73 54.7% +0.35 8–10 (44%) 11–14 (44%) — -2.81 2016 1682 124.0 -2.47 -1.63 0.798 46.8% -124 — +133 38.5% -0.69 1–0 2–3 (40%) — +0.21
29 2014 1758 150.7 -0.20 -0.49 0.977 49.6% -2 -88 — 44.6% +0.02 6–6 (50%) 7–13 (35%) — +1.01 2017 1740 131.9 +1.11 -2.04 0.978 49.7% -14 — +51 40.5% -0.36 1–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.17
30 2015 1668 137.9 +1.03 +1.07 1.123 51.4% +16 -3 — 47.9% +0.08 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.31 2018 1678 127.0 -0.16 -1.20 0.969 49.4% -91 — +171 43.3% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) — +1.00
31 2016 1572 126.0 -1.95 -1.62 0.867 47.8% -29 +124 +224 40.7% -0.70 2–6 (25%) 7–4 (64%) — +0.02 2019 1579 109.6 -3.16 -1.14 0.753 46.3% -3 — — 25.0% -1.63 — — — +0.11
32 2017 1607 117.9 -1.14 +0.70 1.014 50.1% — +110 — 53.8% -0.15 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.39 2020 1514 93.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 1593 98.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1497 101.4 +0.23 -1.99 1.032 50.8% — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 0–2 — +0.09
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1445 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2025 1573 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1967 146.6 +0.28 +0.40 1.007 50.2% +16 -119 -48 47.8% -0.12 39–39 (50%) 56–50 (53%) 103.4 -1.03 — 1838 133.0 -0.96 -1.44 0.886 48.0% -14 -189 +77 39.8% -0.70 28–36 (44%) 46–49 (48%) 97.9 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.