H2H data updated: 2026-07-21 02:15 UTC
Ivan Dodig vs Oscar Hernandez H2H: 1-0
Ivan Dodig holds a 1–0 lead over Oscar Hernandez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ivan Dodig leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ivan Dodig won the 2010 Wimbledon first round 6-1 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2010* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Ivan Dodig | 6-1 6-3 6-3 | Oscar Hernandez | Match data |
| Apr 11, 2010 | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Clay | Oscar Hernandez | 2-6 6-3 6-3 | Ivan Dodig | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Dodig | #423 | #29 | 1,330 | 1,964 | 114 | 129 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Oscar Hernandez | #1,759 | #48 | 1,168 | 1,743 | 65 | 125 | 34.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ivan Dodig | Oscar Hernandez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #422 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2009 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2010 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #85 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #115 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #95 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #58 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #87 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #68 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2016 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #147 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 15–27 | 35.7% | #70 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #336 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #221 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |