H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Ivan Dodig vs Pere Riba H2H: 2-1
Ivan Dodig holds a 2–1 lead over Pere Riba in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Pere Riba leads 1–0 on clay, while Ivan Dodig leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ivan Dodig won the 2014 Moscow third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2014* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Ivan Dodig | 6-4 6-2 | Pere Riba | Match data |
| Jun 9, 2011* | Halle | ATP 500 | R32 | Grass | Ivan Dodig | 7-6(4) 7-6(6) | Pere Riba | Match data |
| May 24, 2011* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Pere Riba | 6-3 3-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | Ivan Dodig | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Dodig | #423 | #29 | 1,330 | 1,964 | 114 | 129 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Pere Riba | #1,502 | #65 | 761 | 1,731 | 24 | 63 | 27.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ivan Dodig | Pere Riba | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #272 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #121 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #72 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #422 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #89 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #447 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #126 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #114 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #219 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #95 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #87 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2016 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #147 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #336 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |