H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Ivan Lendl vs David Wheaton H2H: 3-5

David Wheaton holds a 5–3 lead over Ivan Lendl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while David Wheaton leads 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, David Wheaton won the 1994 Cincinnati Open round of 32 7-6(5) 2-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivan Lendl
USA Age 66 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 5
8 main draw meetings
David Wheaton
USA Age 57 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Wheaton #65 7-6(5) 2-0 (ret.) Ivan Lendl #29 Match data Aug 11, 1994* R32 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
David Wheaton #97 2-6 6-3 7-6(8) Ivan Lendl #30 Match data Jul 22, 1994* R16 Washington Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
David Wheaton #47 6-3 7-5 Ivan Lendl #19 Match data Nov 3, 1993* R64 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Carpet
Ivan Lendl #11 6-1 6-2 David Wheaton #44 Match data Aug 16, 1992* QF Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Ivan Lendl #4 7-6(5) 7-5 David Wheaton #13 Match data Oct 12, 1991* QF Tokyo Indoor ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet
David Wheaton #20 6-3 3-6 7-6(6) 6-3 Ivan Lendl #3 Match data Jun 30, 1991* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
David Wheaton #27 6-2 7-6 Ivan Lendl #3 Match data Dec 16, 1990* QF Grand Slam Cup ATP Finals Carpet
Ivan Lendl #1 6-7 6-3 6-2 David Wheaton #428 Match data Jul 31, 1987* R16 Washington Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ivan Lendl #667 #1 3,420 2,423 1,045 227 82.2% 8 0 6 17 63 94
David Wheaton #874 #12 1,506 1,985 231 190 54.9% 0 0 1 0 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Lendl David Wheaton
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1986 0–1 0.0% #785 1,492 0 0
18 1978 9–7 56.2% #74 1,638 0 0 1987 3–3 50.0% #345 1,525 0 0
19 1979 35–17 67.3% #21 1,885 0 0 1988 0–3 0.0% #441 1,493 0 0
20 1980 101–27 78.9% #6 2,135 0 7 1989 18–16 52.9% #66 1,683 0 0
21 1981 91–11 89.2% #3 2,317 0 17 1990 35–20 63.6% #27 1,874 0 1
22 1982 104–8 92.9% #3 2,371 0 32 1991 33–19 63.5% #17 1,957 0 2
23 1983 75–16 82.4% #2 2,235 0 39 1992 30–23 56.6% #44 1,806 0 2
24 1984 58–12 82.9% #3 2,236 1 42 1993 27–25 51.9% #54 1,730 0 2
25 1985 80–6 93.0% #1 2,367 2 53 1994 28–18 60.9% #39 1,783 0 3
26 1986 75–6 92.6% #1 2,356 4 62 1995 28–24 53.8% #44 1,705 0 3
27 1987 75–7 91.5% #1 2,362 6 70 1996 12–15 44.4% #131 1,704 0 3
28 1988 41–8 83.7% #2 2,221 6 73 1997 10–8 55.6% #148 1,705 0 3
29 1989 80–7 92.0% #1 2,261 7 83 1998 6–10 37.5% #229 1,621 0 3
30 1990 54–12 81.8% #3 2,132 8 88 1999 0–2 0.0% #565 1,584 0 3
31 1991 55–18 75.3% #5 2,032 8 91 2000 1–3 25.0% #313 1,563 0 3
32 1992 51–24 68.0% #8 1,997 8 92 — — — — — — —
33 1993 33–23 58.9% #19 1,779 8 94 — — — — — — —
34 1994 28–18 60.9% #55 1,756 8 94 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ivan Lendl David Wheaton
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — 1987 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1979 11 4 15 73.3% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1980 31 5 36 86.1% 40 8 48 83.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 25 11 36 69.4% 1989 13 9 22 59.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
21 1981 39 2 41 95.1% 42 6 48 87.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 1990 17 8 25 68.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 7 14 50.0%
22 1982 22 3 25 88.0% 44 5 49 89.8% — — — — 38 0 38 100.0% 1991 15 10 25 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 9 2 11 81.8% 6 3 9 66.7%
23 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 14 3 17 82.4% 30 5 35 85.7% 1992 16 11 27 59.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
24 1984 10 3 13 76.9% 13 2 15 86.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 28 4 32 87.5% 1993 14 14 28 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 5 7 28.6%
25 1985 29 3 32 90.6% 27 1 28 96.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 17 0 17 100.0% 1994 18 10 28 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
26 1986 30 2 32 93.8% 17 1 18 94.4% 6 1 7 85.7% 22 2 24 91.7% 1995 11 10 21 52.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
27 1987 34 2 36 94.4% 14 1 15 93.3% 10 2 12 83.3% 17 2 19 89.5% 1996 6 7 13 46.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1988 17 3 20 85.0% 15 1 16 93.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1997 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1989 39 2 41 95.1% 21 2 23 91.3% 11 1 12 91.7% 9 2 11 81.8% 1998 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 1990 21 6 27 77.8% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 5 28 82.1% 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 31 8 39 79.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 6 25 76.0% 2000 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 1992 30 10 40 75.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 6 9 15 40.0% 15 7 22 68.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 11 5 16 68.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1994 23 13 36 63.9% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 392 81 473 82.9% 307 67 374 82.1% 81 25 106 76.4% 265 54 319 83.1% — 125 101 226 55.3% 30 27 57 52.6% 48 27 75 64.0% 28 35 63 44.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 225/250 of Ivan Lendl's and 269/322 of David Wheaton's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ivan Lendl David Wheaton
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 41/52 7.4 3.9 60.4% 72.9% 49.6% 65.8% 35.4% 63.6% 38.3%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 48/53 8.1 5.7 56.1% 75.9% 47.9% 59.7% 43.5% 63.6% 36.8%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 43/52 8.0 5.4 58.1% 72.7% 47.6% 55.1% 46.0% 62.2% 37.9%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 39/46 9.8 4.0 59.4% 75.5% 49.4% 64.3% 40.8% 64.9% 37.4%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 42/52 6.9 2.4 65.8% 72.8% 51.7% 57.0% 44.9% 65.4% 38.0%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 22/27 8.9 4.1 58.2% 74.3% 48.1% 47.5% 42.4% 63.3% 37.2%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 17/18 5.5 3.2 63.6% 68.5% 47.3% 57.7% 41.2% 60.8% 37.4%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 11/16 6.9 5.7 59.8% 71.2% 49.8% 59.6% 34.1% 62.4% 37.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 2/2 6.0 9.0 58.3% 70.1% 31.3% 61.1% 16.7% 53.8% 27.1%
31 1991 62/73 7.3 3.1 54.8% 76.4% 54.6% 64.9% 47.8% 66.6% 41.8% 2000 4/4 6.5 4.5 56.0% 74.3% 53.6% 62.8% 55.6% 65.0% 34.3%
32 1992 68/75 6.7 2.8 55.5% 76.8% 54.4% 64.4% 43.8% 66.7% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 52/56 6.3 2.3 56.4% 74.6% 50.0% 56.4% 42.3% 63.6% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 1994 43/46 7.1 2.4 53.5% 75.8% 54.0% 61.7% 41.4% 65.6% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 225/1,272 6.8 2.7 55.2% 76.0% 53.4% 62.2% 44.1% 65.7% 41.1% — 269/421 7.8 4.3 59.9% 73.5% 48.9% 59.1% 41.8% 63.5% 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ivan Lendl David Wheaton
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1493 101.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.05
18 1978 1638 133.5 — — — — -62 +28 — 52.8% +0.33 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.27 1987 1525 127.6 — — — — +28 — — 47.1% +0.06 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.15
19 1979 1885 154.3 — — — — -118 +4 — 63.1% +0.95 5–5 (50%) 7–4 (64%) — -0.51 1988 1494 102.6 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 1–0 — -0.14
20 1980 2135 170.0 — — — — +71 -36 -486 73.1% +1.68 16–8 (67%) 19–13 (59%) — -7.38 1989 1684 136.0 — — — — +1 — -144 50.0% +0.06 7–6 (54%) 6–14 (30%) — -1.35
21 1981 2318 177.0 — — — — +49 -31 — 80.5% +2.32 17–7 (71%) 15–7 (68%) — -6.33 1990 1874 150.4 — — — — -5 -289 -180 58.9% +0.60 13–7 (65%) 12–15 (44%) — -1.34
22 1982 2371 176.5 — — — — +113 -76 — 86.7% +2.34 10–5 (67%) 19–3 (86%) — -3.79 1991 1957 156.3 +2.86 +1.19 1.052 50.9% -13 -360 -71 60.0% +0.56 8–7 (53%) 15–9 (63%) — -4.05
23 1983 2236 174.0 — — — — +136 -39 -282 77.4% +1.93 8–6 (57%) 23–11 (68%) — -4.88 1992 1806 145.3 +1.33 -0.69 1.009 50.2% +44 -202 +66 53.1% +0.22 13–6 (68%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.32
24 1984 2237 173.5 — — — — +88 +36 -239 75.3% +1.76 10–1 (91%) 12–6 (67%) — -5.71 1993 1730 145.2 +0.85 +0.44 1.001 50.1% +8 -96 +174 51.4% +0.23 11–10 (52%) 11–8 (58%) — -1.90
25 1985 2368 176.3 — — — — +99 -15 -354 85.1% +2.46 9–1 (90%) 17–6 (74%) — -4.64 1994 1783 150.7 +2.86 +0.69 1.065 51.0% -7 — +170 56.4% +0.39 12–9 (57%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.67
26 1986 2356 173.1 — — — — +95 +19 -277 86.0% +2.38 7–0 (100%) 12–8 (60%) — -2.06 1995 1705 138.8 +3.53 +0.28 1.099 51.9% -14 +18 +177 55.1% +0.37 5–9 (36%) 11–11 (50%) — +0.22
27 1987 2363 171.7 — — — — +80 +21 -226 80.4% +2.12 12–4 (75%) 23–13 (64%) — -1.78 1996 1704 124.8 +0.59 -0.15 1.012 50.4% -10 -36 +158 50.0% +0.08 2–5 (29%) 8–3 (73%) — +0.53
28 1988 2222 168.1 — — — — +65 +179 -105 73.7% +1.63 10–4 (71%) 14–10 (58%) — -1.43 1997 1706 125.0 -1.29 +0.95 0.954 49.2% -17 — +152 50.0% -0.10 7–4 (64%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.20
29 1989 2261 172.4 — — — — +69 +112 -133 82.4% +2.40 16–4 (80%) 24–10 (71%) — -2.21 1998 1622 114.8 +0.55 -0.28 1.004 49.9% +11 — +165 39.0% -0.56 1–4 (20%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.22
30 1990 2132 165.0 — — — — +32 — +70 75.7% +1.75 9–6 (60%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.34 1999 1584 95.4 -2.29 -2.68 0.587 41.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.26
31 1991 2033 166.0 +5.18 +4.23 1.249 53.9% +54 +280 +104 67.7% +1.22 17–7 (71%) 14–12 (54%) — -1.66 2000 1563 101.9 +1.95 -0.92 0.979 50.4% — — — 33.3% +0.11 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.27
32 1992 1997 164.6 +4.81 +3.55 1.235 53.6% +64 +118 +93 66.0% +1.13 11–15 (42%) 11–18 (38%) — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 1780 148.0 +2.08 +1.52 1.099 51.4% +85 +205 +256 57.1% +0.56 11–8 (58%) 7–14 (33%) — +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1994 1757 147.7 +2.90 +2.81 1.201 52.9% +41 +134 — 63.1% +1.05 6–5 (55%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2424 174.3 +3.92 +3.13 1.199 53.0% +72 +21 -180 75.9% +1.82 176–89 (66%) 235–154 (60%) 99.4 -3.47 — 1986 148.6 +1.78 +0.28 1.027 50.5% +2 -132 +57 53.2% +0.25 81–70 (54%) 98–93 (51%) 101.8 -2.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.