H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Ivan Lendl vs David Wheaton H2H: 3-5

David Wheaton holds a 5–3 lead over Ivan Lendl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while David Wheaton leads 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, David Wheaton won the 1994 Cincinnati Masters third round 7-6(5) 2-0 RET.

USA Age 66 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 5
8 main draw meetings
USA Age 57 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 11, 1994* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard David Wheaton #65 7-6(5) 2-0 (ret.) Ivan Lendl #29 Match data
Jul 22, 1994* Washington ATP 250 R16 Hard David Wheaton #97 2-6 6-3 7-6(8) Ivan Lendl #30 Match data
Nov 3, 1993* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Carpet David Wheaton #47 6-3 7-5 Ivan Lendl #19 Match data
Aug 16, 1992* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Ivan Lendl #11 6-1 6-2 David Wheaton #44 Match data
Oct 12, 1991* Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 QF Carpet Ivan Lendl #4 7-6(5) 7-5 David Wheaton #13 Match data
Jun 30, 1991* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass David Wheaton #20 6-3 3-6 7-6(6) 6-3 Ivan Lendl #3 Match data
Dec 16, 1990* Grand Slam Cup ATP Finals QF Carpet David Wheaton #27 6-2 7-6 Ivan Lendl #3 Match data
Jul 31, 1987* Washington ATP 250 R16 Hard Ivan Lendl #1 6-7 6-3 6-2 David Wheaton #428 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ivan Lendl #667 #1 3,420 2,424 1,051 229 82.1% 8 11 6 0 69 94
David Wheaton #874 #12 1,506 1,984 231 190 54.9% 0 0 1 0 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Lendl David Wheaton
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1986 0–1 0.0% #785 1,492 0 0
18 1978 9–7 56.2% #74 1,637 0 0 1987 3–3 50.0% #345 1,525 0 0
19 1979 35–17 67.3% #21 1,882 0 0 1988 0–3 0.0% #441 1,494 0 0
20 1980 103–28 78.6% #6 2,131 0 7 1989 18–16 52.9% #66 1,683 0 0
21 1981 95–12 88.8% #3 2,321 0 17 1990 35–20 63.6% #27 1,873 0 1
22 1982 104–8 92.9% #3 2,369 0 32 1991 33–19 63.5% #17 1,955 0 2
23 1983 75–16 82.4% #2 2,235 0 39 1992 30–23 56.6% #44 1,804 0 2
24 1984 58–12 82.9% #3 2,234 1 42 1993 27–25 51.9% #54 1,730 0 2
25 1985 80–6 93.0% #1 2,367 2 53 1994 28–18 60.9% #39 1,782 0 3
26 1986 75–6 92.6% #1 2,355 4 62 1995 28–24 53.8% #44 1,705 0 3
27 1987 75–7 91.5% #1 2,362 6 70 1996 12–15 44.4% #131 1,704 0 3
28 1988 41–8 83.7% #2 2,220 6 73 1997 10–8 55.6% #148 1,704 0 3
29 1989 80–7 92.0% #1 2,261 7 83 1998 6–10 37.5% #229 1,620 0 3
30 1990 54–12 81.8% #3 2,130 8 88 1999 0–2 0.0% #565 1,582 0 3
31 1991 55–18 75.3% #5 2,031 8 91 2000 1–3 25.0% #313 1,562 0 3
32 1992 51–24 68.0% #8 2,006 8 92
33 1993 33–23 58.9% #19 1,780 8 94
34 1994 28–18 60.9% #55 1,754 8 94