H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ivan Lendl vs Marcelo Filippini H2H: 2-1
Ivan Lendl holds a 2–1 lead over Marcelo Filippini in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Ivan Lendl leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcelo Filippini won the 1993 Rome Masters second round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
URU
Age 58
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 1993* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Marcelo Filippini | 6-2 6-1 | Ivan Lendl | Match data |
| Mar 19, 1990* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Ivan Lendl | 6-0 6-2 | Marcelo Filippini | Match data |
| Sep 23, 1989* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Ivan Lendl | 6-4 7-6 | Marcelo Filippini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Lendl | #667 | #1 | 3,420 | 2,424 | 1,051 | 229 | 82.1% | 8 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 69 | 94 |
| Marcelo Filippini | #967 | #30 | 971 | 1,799 | 217 | 229 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ivan Lendl | Marcelo Filippini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1978 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #74 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1979 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #21 | 1,882 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #118 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 103–28 | 78.6% | #6 | 2,131 | 0 | 7 | 1988 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #53 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1981 | 95–12 | 88.8% | #3 | 2,321 | 0 | 17 | 1989 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #43 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1982 | 104–8 | 92.9% | #3 | 2,369 | 0 | 32 | 1990 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #49 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1983 | 75–16 | 82.4% | #2 | 2,235 | 0 | 39 | 1991 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #107 | 1,528 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1984 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #3 | 2,234 | 1 | 42 | 1992 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #60 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1985 | 80–6 | 93.0% | #1 | 2,367 | 2 | 53 | 1993 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #87 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1986 | 75–6 | 92.6% | #1 | 2,355 | 4 | 62 | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #60 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1987 | 75–7 | 91.5% | #1 | 2,362 | 6 | 70 | 1995 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,674 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1988 | 41–8 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,220 | 6 | 73 | 1996 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #81 | 1,659 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1989 | 80–7 | 92.0% | #1 | 2,261 | 7 | 83 | 1997 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #44 | 1,697 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1990 | 54–12 | 81.8% | #3 | 2,130 | 8 | 88 | 1998 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #135 | 1,592 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1991 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #5 | 2,031 | 8 | 91 | 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,586 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 1992 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #8 | 2,006 | 8 | 92 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #775 | 1,560 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 1993 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #19 | 1,780 | 8 | 94 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1994 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #55 | 1,754 | 8 | 94 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |