H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Ivan Lendl vs Stefan Edberg H2H: 13-14

Stefan Edberg holds a 14–13 lead over Ivan Lendl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 27 main-draw meetings, Stefan Edberg leads 8–6 on hard courts, while Ivan Lendl leads 6–4 on carpet. Most recently, Stefan Edberg won the 1992 US Open quarterfinal 6-3 6-3 3-6 5-7 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivan Lendl
USA Age 66 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
13 – 14
27 main draw meetings
Stefan Edberg
SWE Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Stefan Edberg #2 6-3 6-3 3-6 5-7 7-6(3) Ivan Lendl #7 Match data Sep 11, 1992* QF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Stefan Edberg #2 7-6(2) 4-6 6-3 Ivan Lendl #7 Match data Aug 22, 1992* SF New Haven ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Stefan Edberg #1 4-6 7-5 6-1 6-7(5) 6-1 Ivan Lendl #4 Match data Jan 24, 1992* QF Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Stefan Edberg #2 6-3 6-3 6-4 Ivan Lendl #3 Match data Sep 8, 1991* SF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Ivan Lendl #5 6-3 6-2 Stefan Edberg #2 Match data Aug 25, 1991* F Long Island ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Stefan Edberg #1 6-1 7-5 6-0 Ivan Lendl #3 Match data Apr 14, 1991* F Japan Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Ivan Lendl #3 6-4 5-7 3-6 7-6(3) 6-4 Stefan Edberg #1 Match data Jan 27, 1991* SF Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Stefan Edberg #1 6-4 6-2 Ivan Lendl #3 Match data Nov 19, 1990* SF ATP Finals ATP Finals Carpet
Ivan Lendl #3 7-5 6-3 Stefan Edberg #1 Match data Oct 13, 1990* SF Tokyo Indoor ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet
Stefan Edberg #1 3-6 7-6 6-3 Ivan Lendl #3 Match data Oct 6, 1990* SF Sydney Indoor ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Stefan Edberg #3 6-1 7-6 6-3 Ivan Lendl #1 Match data Jul 8, 1990* SF Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Ivan Lendl #1 4-6 7-6 5-2 (ret.) Stefan Edberg #3 Match data Jan 29, 1990* F Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Stefan Edberg #3 7-6 7-5 Ivan Lendl #1 Match data Dec 5, 1989* SF ATP Finals ATP Finals Carpet
Ivan Lendl #1 6-0 2-6 6-3 Stefan Edberg #3 Match data Nov 11, 1989* SF Stockholm Open ATP 250 Carpet
Stefan Edberg #5 6-3 2-6 6-4 Ivan Lendl #1 Match data Apr 23, 1989* F Japan Open ATP 250 Hard
Ivan Lendl #1 6-2 6-3 Stefan Edberg #4 Match data Mar 12, 1989* F Scottsdale ATP 250 Hard
Ivan Lendl #2 6-3 7-6 Stefan Edberg #5 Match data Dec 7, 1988* SF ATP Finals ATP Finals Carpet
Stefan Edberg #2 6-7 6-4 6-4 Ivan Lendl #1 Match data Oct 26, 1987* F Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 Carpet
Ivan Lendl #1 6-4 7-6 Stefan Edberg #3 Match data Aug 17, 1987* F Canadian Open ATP 500 Hard
Ivan Lendl #1 3-6 6-4 7-6 6-4 Stefan Edberg #4 Match data Jul 5, 1987* SF Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Ivan Lendl #1 6-3 6-4 Stefan Edberg #4 Match data Dec 1, 1986 RR ATP Finals ATP Finals Carpet
Stefan Edberg #4 7-5 6-1 Ivan Lendl #1 Match data Oct 25, 1986* SF Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 Carpet
Ivan Lendl #1 7-6 6-2 6-3 Stefan Edberg #4 Match data Sep 8, 1986* SF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Stefan Edberg #6 6-7 7-5 6-1 4-6 9-7 Ivan Lendl #1 Match data Dec 8, 1985* SF Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Ivan Lendl #2 3-6 7-6 3-6 6-1 6-2 Stefan Edberg #17 Match data Apr 13, 1985* QF Dallas ATP 250 Carpet
Stefan Edberg #13 6-4 7-6 Ivan Lendl #3 Match data Feb 9, 1985* R16 Miami Open ATP 500 Hard
Ivan Lendl #2 6-3 2-6 7-6 Stefan Edberg #83 Match data Mar 17, 1984* SF ABN AMRO Open ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ivan Lendl #667 #1 3,420 2,423 1,045 227 82.2% 8 0 6 17 63 94
Stefan Edberg #1,347 #1 3,997 2,237 748 248 75.1% 6 4 1 9 21 41

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Lendl Stefan Edberg
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1982 0–3 0.0% — 1,463 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1983 12–10 54.5% #54 1,616 0 0
18 1978 9–7 56.2% #74 1,638 0 0 1984 27–18 60.0% #20 1,825 0 1
19 1979 35–17 67.3% #21 1,885 0 0 1985 58–17 77.3% #5 2,130 1 5
20 1980 101–27 78.9% #6 2,135 0 7 1986 66–20 76.7% #5 2,124 1 8
21 1981 91–11 89.2% #3 2,317 0 17 1987 75–12 86.2% #2 2,208 2 15
22 1982 104–8 92.9% #3 2,371 0 32 1988 58–16 78.4% #5 2,077 3 18
23 1983 75–16 82.4% #2 2,235 0 39 1989 58–16 78.4% #3 2,154 3 20
24 1984 58–12 82.9% #3 2,236 1 42 1990 67–13 83.8% #1 2,175 4 27
25 1985 80–6 93.0% #1 2,367 2 53 1991 73–14 83.9% #1 2,147 5 33
26 1986 75–6 92.6% #1 2,356 4 62 1992 64–20 76.2% #2 2,035 6 36
27 1987 75–7 91.5% #1 2,362 6 70 1993 58–22 72.5% #5 1,986 6 37
28 1988 41–8 83.7% #2 2,221 6 73 1994 53–23 69.7% #7 1,873 6 40
29 1989 80–7 92.0% #1 2,261 7 83 1995 35–19 64.8% #23 1,827 6 41
30 1990 54–12 81.8% #3 2,132 8 88 1996 44–25 63.8% #14 1,887 6 41
31 1991 55–18 75.3% #5 2,032 8 91 — — — — — — —
32 1992 51–24 68.0% #8 1,997 8 92 — — — — — — —
33 1993 33–23 58.9% #19 1,779 8 94 — — — — — — —
34 1994 28–18 60.9% #55 1,756 8 94 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ivan Lendl Stefan Edberg
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 6 5 11 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
18 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — 1984 9 5 14 64.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 6 15 60.0%
19 1979 11 4 15 73.3% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 25 7 32 78.1% 8 2 10 80.0% 9 1 10 90.0% 16 7 23 69.6%
20 1980 31 5 36 86.1% 40 8 48 83.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 25 11 36 69.4% 1986 32 5 37 86.5% 12 3 15 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 16 10 26 61.5%
21 1981 39 2 41 95.1% 42 6 48 87.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 1987 42 5 47 89.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 14 2 16 87.5% 14 2 16 87.5%
22 1982 22 3 25 88.0% 44 5 49 89.8% — — — — 38 0 38 100.0% 1988 28 9 37 75.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 12 1 13 92.3% 12 4 16 75.0%
23 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 14 3 17 82.4% 30 5 35 85.7% 1989 29 7 36 80.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 6 2 8 75.0% 14 5 19 73.7%
24 1984 10 3 13 76.9% 13 2 15 86.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 28 4 32 87.5% 1990 39 5 44 88.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 16 4 20 80.0%
25 1985 29 3 32 90.6% 27 1 28 96.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 17 0 17 100.0% 1991 39 7 46 84.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% 18 3 21 85.7%
26 1986 30 2 32 93.8% 17 1 18 94.4% 6 1 7 85.7% 22 2 24 91.7% 1992 32 6 38 84.2% 9 3 12 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 16 9 25 64.0%
27 1987 34 2 36 94.4% 14 1 15 93.3% 10 2 12 83.3% 17 2 19 89.5% 1993 24 9 33 72.7% 16 4 20 80.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 11 7 18 61.1%
28 1988 17 3 20 85.0% 15 1 16 93.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1994 31 9 40 77.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 11 7 18 61.1%
29 1989 39 2 41 95.1% 21 2 23 91.3% 11 1 12 91.7% 9 2 11 81.8% 1995 26 11 37 70.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 1990 21 6 27 77.8% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 5 28 82.1% 1996 18 12 30 60.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
31 1991 31 8 39 79.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 6 25 76.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1992 30 10 40 75.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 6 9 15 40.0% 15 7 22 68.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 11 5 16 68.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1994 23 13 36 63.9% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 392 81 473 82.9% 307 67 374 82.1% 81 25 106 76.4% 265 54 319 83.1% — 380 104 484 78.5% 110 48 158 69.6% 98 26 124 79.0% 160 70 230 69.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ivan Lendl Stefan Edberg
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1464 96.7 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.62 0–2 1–0 — +0.35
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1617 133.1 — — — — +5 -20 -83 52.8% +0.21 2–2 (50%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.10
18 1978 1638 133.5 — — — — -62 +28 — 52.8% +0.33 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.27 1984 1826 153.7 — — — — -28 -162 -156 60.9% +0.75 5–7 (42%) 11–11 (50%) — -0.06
19 1979 1885 154.3 — — — — -118 +4 — 63.1% +0.95 5–5 (50%) 7–4 (64%) — -0.51 1985 2130 166.9 — — — — -89 -335 -173 72.7% +1.45 7–8 (47%) 19–14 (58%) — -3.55
20 1980 2135 170.0 — — — — +71 -36 -486 73.1% +1.68 16–8 (67%) 19–13 (59%) — -7.38 1986 2125 164.5 — — — — +27 -250 -162 69.7% +1.52 18–7 (72%) 19–13 (59%) — -1.90
21 1981 2318 177.0 — — — — +49 -31 — 80.5% +2.32 17–7 (71%) 15–7 (68%) — -6.33 1987 2209 172.3 — — — — +77 -360 -99 77.7% +1.92 13–3 (81%) 19–16 (54%) — -3.18
22 1982 2371 176.5 — — — — +113 -76 — 86.7% +2.34 10–5 (67%) 19–3 (86%) — -3.79 1988 2077 159.9 — — — — +31 -199 +95 72.3% +1.37 14–8 (64%) 16–8 (67%) — -2.31
23 1983 2236 174.0 — — — — +136 -39 -282 77.4% +1.93 8–6 (57%) 23–11 (68%) — -4.88 1989 2155 169.3 — — — — +39 -186 +7 73.0% +1.25 10–5 (67%) 18–9 (67%) — -6.13
24 1984 2237 173.5 — — — — +88 +36 -239 75.3% +1.76 10–1 (91%) 12–6 (67%) — -5.71 1990 2176 173.1 — — — — +30 -272 +103 74.5% +1.68 16–1 (94%) 19–10 (66%) — -4.50
25 1985 2368 176.3 — — — — +99 -15 -354 85.1% +2.46 9–1 (90%) 17–6 (74%) — -4.64 1991 2148 168.6 +6.92 +5.37 1.372 55.2% +61 -218 +146 78.7% +1.85 12–7 (63%) 18–9 (67%) — -1.02
26 1986 2356 173.1 — — — — +95 +19 -277 86.0% +2.38 7–0 (100%) 12–8 (60%) — -2.06 1992 2036 166.3 +5.64 +3.53 1.246 53.7% +37 -92 +216 68.9% +1.22 17–10 (63%) 29–14 (67%) — +0.13
27 1987 2363 171.7 — — — — +80 +21 -226 80.4% +2.12 12–4 (75%) 23–13 (64%) — -1.78 1993 1987 165.8 +3.09 +4.76 1.184 52.9% +16 +31 +233 67.6% +1.11 15–9 (63%) 24–13 (65%) — -2.70
28 1988 2222 168.1 — — — — +65 +179 -105 73.7% +1.63 10–4 (71%) 14–10 (58%) — -1.43 1994 1874 159.8 +4.24 +3.69 1.218 53.6% +60 +64 +297 67.4% +1.26 11–10 (52%) 13–11 (54%) — +1.11
29 1989 2261 172.4 — — — — +69 +112 -133 82.4% +2.40 16–4 (80%) 24–10 (71%) — -2.21 1995 1827 152.9 +1.63 +3.73 1.143 52.1% +69 +91 +198 60.3% +0.83 12–7 (63%) 13–7 (65%) — +0.90
30 1990 2132 165.0 — — — — +32 — +70 75.7% +1.75 9–6 (60%) 10–9 (53%) — -1.34 1996 1888 152.3 +2.04 +3.83 1.139 52.1% -26 +12 +184 60.6% +0.82 9–9 (50%) 13–17 (43%) — -2.82
31 1991 2033 166.0 +5.18 +4.23 1.249 53.9% +54 +280 +104 67.7% +1.22 17–7 (71%) 14–12 (54%) — -1.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1992 1997 164.6 +4.81 +3.55 1.235 53.6% +64 +118 +93 66.0% +1.13 11–15 (42%) 11–18 (38%) — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 1780 148.0 +2.08 +1.52 1.099 51.4% +85 +205 +256 57.1% +0.56 11–8 (58%) 7–14 (33%) — +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1994 1757 147.7 +2.90 +2.81 1.201 52.9% +41 +134 — 63.1% +1.05 6–5 (55%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2424 174.3 +3.92 +3.13 1.199 53.0% +72 +21 -180 75.9% +1.82 176–89 (66%) 235–154 (60%) 99.4 -3.47 — 2237 168.9 +4.15 +4.19 1.222 53.4% +27 -108 +46 69.9% +1.32 161–95 (63%) 235–156 (60%) 102.1 -2.58

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.