H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Ivan Lendl vs Tim Wilkison H2H: 3-0

Ivan Lendl holds a 3–0 lead over Tim Wilkison in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ivan Lendl leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ivan Lendl won the 1986 Chicago third round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivan Lendl
USA Age 66 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Tim Wilkison
USA Age 66 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 27, 1986* Chicago ATP 250 R32 Carpet Ivan Lendl #1 6-4 6-3 Tim Wilkison #41 Match data
Aug 9, 1985* Stratton Mountain ATP 250 R16 Hard Ivan Lendl #2 6-4 6-4 Tim Wilkison #42 Match data
Jun 9, 1983* Queen's Club ATP 250 R32 Grass Ivan Lendl #3 4-6 7-5 6-3 Tim Wilkison #64 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ivan Lendl #667 #1 3,420 2,424 1,051 229 82.1% 8 11 6 0 69 94
Tim Wilkison #1,167 #23 269 1,894 294 298 49.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Lendl Tim Wilkison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1977 21–27 43.8% #114 1,567 0 0
18 1978 9–7 56.2% #74 1,637 0 0 1978 10–13 43.5% #54 1,659 0 1
19 1979 35–17 67.3% #21 1,882 0 0 1979 26–26 50.0% #69 1,665 0 2
20 1980 103–28 78.6% #6 2,131 0 7 1980 24–25 49.0% #95 1,684 0 2
21 1981 95–12 88.8% #3 2,321 0 17 1981 23–24 48.9% #71 1,755 0 3
22 1982 104–8 92.9% #3 2,369 0 32 1982 28–22 56.0% #61 1,715 0 4
23 1983 75–16 82.4% #2 2,235 0 39 1983 14–20 41.2% #88 1,678 0 4
24 1984 58–12 82.9% #3 2,234 1 42 1984 26–20 56.5% #39 1,765 0 5
25 1985 80–6 93.0% #1 2,367 2 53 1985 36–28 56.2% #44 1,807 0 6
26 1986 75–6 92.6% #1 2,355 4 62 1986 33–23 58.9% #29 1,771 0 6
27 1987 75–7 91.5% #1 2,362 6 70 1987 23–20 53.5% #55 1,729 0 6
28 1988 41–8 83.7% #2 2,220 6 73 1988 15–20 42.9% #121 1,672 0 6
29 1989 80–7 92.0% #1 2,261 7 83 1989 8–16 33.3% #124 1,599 0 6
30 1990 54–12 81.8% #3 2,130 8 88 1990 7–13 35.0% #210 1,540 0 6
31 1991 55–18 75.3% #5 2,031 8 91 — — — — — — —
32 1992 51–24 68.0% #8 2,006 8 92 — — — — — — —
33 1993 33–23 58.9% #19 1,780 8 94 1993 0–1 0.0% #1178 1,522 0 6
34 1994 28–18 60.9% #55 1,754 8 94 — — — — — — —