H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Ivan Ljubicic vs Francisco Clavet H2H: 0-1

Francisco Clavet holds a 1–0 lead over Ivan Ljubicic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Francisco Clavet leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 2000 S Hertogenbosch third round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivan Ljubicic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 22, 2000* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 R32 Grass Francisco Clavet #44 6-2 6-2 Ivan Ljubicic #79 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ivan Ljubicic #53 #3 3,315 2,052 400 282 58.7% 0 1 0 0 9 10
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Ljubicic Francisco Clavet
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1996 1–1 50.0% #576 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1997 1–4 20.0% #289 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1998 0–1 0.0% #293 1,482 0 0 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0
20 1999 11–12 47.8% #77 1,587 0 0 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0
21 2000 19–21 47.5% #91 1,654 0 0 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1
22 2001 27–21 56.2% #37 1,824 0 1 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1
23 2002 27–27 50.0% #49 1,741 0 1 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1
24 2003 27–23 54.0% #42 1,791 0 1 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1
25 2004 33–22 60.0% #22 1,809 0 1 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1
26 2005 50–23 68.5% #9 1,951 0 3 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2
27 2006 55–19 74.3% #5 1,944 0 6 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3
28 2007 43–22 66.2% #18 1,807 0 8 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5
29 2008 20–19 51.3% #44 1,724 0 8 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7
30 2009 32–23 58.2% #24 1,894 0 9 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7
31 2010 26–19 57.8% #17 1,884 0 10 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7
32 2011 25–19 56.8% #30 1,909 0 10 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8
33 2012 3–6 33.3% #53 1,794 0 10 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8
34 — — — — — — — 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8