H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Ivan Ljubicic vs Jurgen Melzer H2H: 0-5

Jurgen Melzer holds a 5–0 lead over Ivan Ljubicic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jurgen Melzer leads 2–0 on grass and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jurgen Melzer won the 2011 Shanghai Masters second round 6-4 6-2.

CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 5
5 main draw meetings
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 11, 2011* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jurgen Melzer #20 6-4 6-2 Ivan Ljubicic #25 Match data
Aug 1, 2009* Umag ATP 250 QF Clay Jurgen Melzer #34 4-6 7-6(3) 6-3 Ivan Ljubicic #64 Match data
Oct 9, 2008* Vienna ATP 500 R32 Hard Jurgen Melzer #38 7-6(3) 6-3 Ivan Ljubicic #49 Match data
Jun 25, 2008* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Jurgen Melzer #72 6-4 7-6(7) 4-6 2-6 6-3 Ivan Ljubicic #31 Match data
Jun 22, 2005* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Jurgen Melzer #38 6-4 6-4 6-4 Ivan Ljubicic #16 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ivan Ljubicic #53 #3 3,315 2,052 400 282 58.7% 0 1 0 0 9 10
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,024 326 303 51.8% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Ljubicic Jurgen Melzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1996 1–1 50.0% #576 1,509 0 0
18 1997 1–4 20.0% #289 1,489 0 0 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0
19 1998 0–1 0.0% #293 1,482 0 0 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0
20 1999 11–12 47.8% #77 1,587 0 0 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0
21 2000 19–21 47.5% #91 1,654 0 0 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,659 0 0
22 2001 27–21 56.2% #37 1,824 0 1 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,584 0 0
23 2002 27–27 50.0% #49 1,741 0 1 2004 27–22 55.1% #39 1,769 0 0
24 2003 27–23 54.0% #42 1,791 0 1 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0
25 2004 33–22 60.0% #22 1,809 0 1 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,780 0 1
26 2005 50–23 68.5% #9 1,951 0 3 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,695 0 1
27 2006 55–19 74.3% #5 1,944 0 6 2008 26–23 53.1% #34 1,778 0 1
28 2007 43–22 66.2% #18 1,807 0 8 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,924 0 2
29 2008 20–19 51.3% #44 1,724 0 8 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,998 0 3
30 2009 32–23 58.2% #24 1,894 0 9 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,799 0 3
31 2010 26–19 57.8% #17 1,884 0 10 2012 18–22 45.0% #29 1,758 0 4
32 2011 25–19 56.8% #30 1,909 0 10 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,825 0 5
33 2012 3–6 33.3% #53 1,794 0 10 2014 12–19 38.7% #113 1,758 0 5
34 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5
35 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,770 0 5
36 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5
37 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,703 0 5