H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ivan Ljubicic vs Marcelo Rios H2H: 0-3
Marcelo Rios holds a 3–0 lead over Ivan Ljubicic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marcelo Rios leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcelo Rios won the 2002 Indian Wells Masters second round 7-6(5) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 47
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
CHI
Age 50
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2002* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 7-6(5) 7-5 | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
| Jan 10, 2002* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 6-7(5) 6-3 7-6(1) | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
| Oct 8, 1999* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Marcelo Rios | 6-3 6-2 | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Ljubicic | #53 | #3 | 3,315 | 2,052 | 400 | 282 | 58.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| Marcelo Rios | #994 | #1 | 3,719 | 2,137 | 366 | 179 | 67.2% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 18 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ivan Ljubicic | Marcelo Rios | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #289 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #107 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1999 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 52–25 | 67.5% | #11 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 2000 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #91 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 66–18 | 78.6% | #2 | 1,948 | 0 | 12 |
| 23 | 2002 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #9 | 1,916 | 0 | 15 |
| 24 | 2003 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #42 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #37 | 1,813 | 0 | 16 |
| 25 | 2004 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #39 | 1,836 | 0 | 18 |
| 26 | 2005 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #9 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #24 | 1,820 | 0 | 18 |
| 27 | 2006 | 55–19 | 74.3% | #5 | 1,944 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #105 | 1,809 | 0 | 18 |
| 28 | 2007 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #18 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #44 | 1,724 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2010 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #17 | 1,884 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2011 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #30 | 1,909 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #53 | 1,794 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |