H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ivan Ljubicic vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 0-1
Michal Przysiezny holds a 1–0 lead over Ivan Ljubicic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michal Przysiezny leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Michal Przysiezny won the 2010 Wimbledon first round 7-5 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 47
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2010* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Michal Przysiezny | 7-5 7-6(5) 6-3 | Ivan Ljubicic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivan Ljubicic | #53 | #3 | 3,315 | 2,052 | 400 | 282 | 58.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Ivan Ljubicic | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #289 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #91 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #42 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #9 | 1,951 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 55–19 | 74.3% | #5 | 1,944 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #18 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #44 | 1,724 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #17 | 1,884 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #30 | 1,909 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #53 | 1,794 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |