H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Ivan Ljubicic vs Thomas Enqvist H2H: 1-1

Ivan Ljubicic and Thomas Enqvist are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ivan Ljubicic leads 1–0 on carpet, while Thomas Enqvist leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ivan Ljubicic won the 2005 Milan third round 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivan Ljubicic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 3, 2005* Milan ATP 250 R32 Carpet Ivan Ljubicic #24 7-5 6-3 Thomas Enqvist #74 Match data
May 5, 2000* Munich ATP 250 R16 Clay Thomas Enqvist #9 6-2 6-7(1) 7-6(5) Ivan Ljubicic #86 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ivan Ljubicic #53 #3 3,315 2,052 400 282 58.7% 0 1 0 0 9 10
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivan Ljubicic Thomas Enqvist
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0
17 1996 1–1 50.0% #576 1,509 0 0 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0
18 1997 1–4 20.0% #289 1,489 0 0 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1
19 1998 0–1 0.0% #293 1,482 0 0 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2
20 1999 11–12 47.8% #77 1,587 0 0 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2
21 2000 19–21 47.5% #91 1,654 0 0 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7
22 2001 27–21 56.2% #37 1,824 0 1 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10
23 2002 27–27 50.0% #49 1,741 0 1 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11
24 2003 27–23 54.0% #42 1,791 0 1 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13
25 2004 33–22 60.0% #22 1,809 0 1 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16
26 2005 50–23 68.5% #9 1,951 0 3 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18
27 2006 55–19 74.3% #5 1,944 0 6 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18
28 2007 43–22 66.2% #18 1,807 0 8 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19
29 2008 20–19 51.3% #44 1,724 0 8 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19
30 2009 32–23 58.2% #24 1,894 0 9 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19
31 2010 26–19 57.8% #17 1,884 0 10 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19
32 2011 25–19 56.8% #30 1,909 0 10 — — — — — — —
33 2012 3–6 33.3% #53 1,794 0 10 — — — — — — —