H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Ivo Karlovic vs Jurgen Melzer H2H: 2-4

Jurgen Melzer holds a 4–2 lead over Ivo Karlovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Jurgen Melzer leads 3–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ivo Karlovic won the 2014 Vienna fourth round 6-4 7-6(1).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ivo Karlovic
CRO Age 47 Right-Handed 211 cm / 6'11"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Jurgen Melzer
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 17, 2014* Vienna ATP 500 R16 Hard Ivo Karlovic #30 6-4 7-6(1) Jurgen Melzer #123 Match data
Jan 18, 2012* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Ivo Karlovic #57 7-6(3) 7-5 6-3 Jurgen Melzer #33 Match data
Aug 15, 2007* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jurgen Melzer #34 7-6(4) 7-6(2) Ivo Karlovic #33 Match data
Jan 17, 2007* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Jurgen Melzer #32 6-4 6-4 7-6(6) Ivo Karlovic #94 Match data
May 6, 2006* Munich ATP 250 QF Clay Jurgen Melzer #70 7-6(4) 6-1 Ivo Karlovic #53 Match data
Mar 23, 2004* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R128 Hard Jurgen Melzer #64 6-4 6-4 Ivo Karlovic #74 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Ivo Karlovic #1,066 #14 2,295 1,998 357 333 51.7% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,024 326 303 51.8% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ivo Karlovic Jurgen Melzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,659 0 0
22 2001 0–1 0.0% #193 1,500 0 0 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,584 0 0
23 2002 1–2 33.3% #201 1,454 0 0 2004 27–22 55.1% #39 1,769 0 0
24 2003 9–7 56.2% #73 1,666 0 0 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0
25 2004 16–24 40.0% #61 1,667 0 0 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,780 0 1
26 2005 17–22 43.6% #70 1,739 0 0 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,695 0 1
27 2006 16–18 47.1% #98 1,632 0 0 2008 26–23 53.1% #34 1,778 0 1
28 2007 45–21 68.2% #22 1,940 0 3 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,924 0 2
29 2008 29–25 53.7% #26 1,815 0 4 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,998 0 3
30 2009 21–22 48.8% #37 1,795 0 4 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,799 0 3
31 2010 16–9 64.0% #73 1,864 0 4 2012 18–22 45.0% #29 1,758 0 4
32 2011 16–20 44.4% #56 1,819 0 4 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,825 0 5
33 2012 14–16 46.7% #100 1,768 0 4 2014 12–19 38.7% #113 1,758 0 5
34 2013 15–13 53.6% #78 1,772 0 5 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5
35 2014 32–27 54.2% #27 1,853 0 5 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,770 0 5
36 2015 38–25 60.3% #23 1,916 0 6 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5
37 2016 32–22 59.3% #20 1,970 0 8 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,703 0 5
38 2017 15–20 42.9% #80 1,770 0 8 — — — — — — —
39 2018 11–16 40.7% #100 1,644 0 8 — — — — — — —
40 2019 11–15 42.3% #95 1,668 0 8 — — — — — — —
41 2020 1–4 20.0% #147 1,615 0 8 — — — — — — —
42 2021 2–4 33.3% #279 1,623 0 8 — — — — — — —