H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jack Sock vs Denis Kudla H2H: 2-2
Jack Sock and Denis Kudla are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Jack Sock won the 2016 Canada Masters second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2016* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jack Sock | 6-2 6-2 | Denis Kudla | Match data |
| Oct 29, 2015* | Basel | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Jack Sock | 6-4 6-2 | Denis Kudla | Match data |
| Jul 31, 2015* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Denis Kudla | 7-6(6) 6-3 | Jack Sock | Match data |
| Feb 16, 2012* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Denis Kudla | 6-4 6-7(6) 6-3 | Jack Sock | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jack Sock | #808 | #8 | 3,165 | 2,127 | 177 | 147 | 54.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Denis Kudla | #1,269 | #53 | 858 | 1,836 | 71 | 131 | 35.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jack Sock | Denis Kudla | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #878 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #496 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #381 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #276 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2012 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #150 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #137 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #102 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #114 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,893 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #121 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #26 | 1,984 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #69 | 1,759 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #23 | 2,034 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #131 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 1,992 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #106 | 1,716 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #63 | 1,789 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,634 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #253 | 1,725 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #114 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #145 | 1,775 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #105 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #131 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #106 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2023 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #671 | 1,716 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #163 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #267 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |