H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jack Sock vs Ernests Gulbis H2H: 1-2
Ernests Gulbis holds a 2–1 lead over Jack Sock in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ernests Gulbis leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Jack Sock leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ernests Gulbis won the 2018 Basel third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
LAT
Age 37
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2018* | Basel | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Ernests Gulbis | 7-5 6-4 | Jack Sock | Match data |
| Oct 20, 2018* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Ernests Gulbis | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Jack Sock | Match data |
| Jun 29, 2016* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Jack Sock | 6-4 6-4 6-4 | Ernests Gulbis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jack Sock | #808 | #8 | 3,165 | 2,127 | 177 | 147 | 54.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Ernests Gulbis | #893 | #10 | 2,725 | 2,139 | 221 | 232 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jack Sock | Ernests Gulbis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #878 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #141 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #381 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #61 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2012 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #150 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #102 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #90 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,893 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #24 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2015 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #26 | 1,984 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2016 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #23 | 2,034 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #136 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2017 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 1,992 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #24 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2018 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #106 | 1,716 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #13 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2019 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,634 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #81 | 1,765 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #253 | 1,725 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,785 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2021 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #145 | 1,775 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #199 | 1,716 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #131 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #95 | 1,813 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2023 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #671 | 1,716 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #226 | 1,533 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,562 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,509 | 0 | 6 |