H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 13:16 UTC
Jack Sock vs Igor Sijsling H2H: 1-0
Jack Sock holds a 1–0 lead over Igor Sijsling in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jack Sock leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jack Sock won the 2013 Washington second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 38
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2013* | Washington | ATP 500 | R64 | Hard | Jack Sock | 6-4 6-2 | Igor Sijsling | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jack Sock | #808 | #8 | 3,165 | 2,127 | 177 | 147 | 54.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Igor Sijsling | #854 | #52 | 910 | 1,794 | 44 | 84 | 34.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jack Sock | Igor Sijsling | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #878 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #381 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2012 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #150 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2013 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #102 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #525 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,893 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #26 | 1,984 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #126 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #23 | 2,034 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #200 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 1,992 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #68 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #106 | 1,716 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,634 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 9–25 | 26.5% | #84 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #253 | 1,725 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #145 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #145 | 1,775 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #177 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #131 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2023 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #671 | 1,716 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |