H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jack Sock vs John Isner H2H: 3-6

John Isner holds a 6–3 lead over Jack Sock in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, John Isner leads 4–1 on hard courts and 2–1 on clay. Most recently, John Isner won the 2021 Atlanta fourth round 7-6(6) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jack Sock
USA Age 33 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3 – 6
9 main draw meetings
John Isner
USA Age 41 Right-Handed 208 cm / 6'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 30, 2021* Atlanta ATP 250 R16 Hard John Isner #35 7-6(6) 6-4 Jack Sock #201 Match data
Nov 5, 2016* Paris Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard John Isner #27 7-6(6) 4-6 6-4 Jack Sock #24 Match data
Apr 9, 2016* Houston ATP 250 SF Clay Jack Sock #25 7-6(4) 6-3 John Isner #15 Match data
Oct 30, 2015* Basel ATP 500 R16 Hard Jack Sock #29 7-6(5) 6-3 John Isner #14 Match data
Jul 26, 2014* Atlanta ATP 250 SF Hard John Isner #12 7-5 6-4 Jack Sock #72 Match data
Jul 12, 2014* Newport ATP 250 QF Grass Jack Sock #76 6-4 7-6(4) John Isner #12 Match data
May 22, 2014* Nice ATP 250 R16 Clay John Isner #11 6-4 6-3 Jack Sock #79 Match data
Apr 12, 2013* Houston ATP 250 R16 Clay John Isner #23 7-5 6-7(3) 7-6(3) Jack Sock #119 Match data
Jul 21, 2012* Atlanta ATP 250 QF Hard John Isner #11 7-6(7) 6-4 Jack Sock #326 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jack Sock #808 #8 3,165 2,127 177 147 54.6% 0 1 0 0 3 4
John Isner #660 #8 3,720 2,053 467 293 61.4% 0 1 0 0 15 16

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jack Sock John Isner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2010 0–1 0.0% #878 1,458 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2011 1–2 33.3% #381 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2012 5–7 41.7% #150 1,601 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2013 10–13 43.5% #102 1,697 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2014 27–20 57.4% #42 1,893 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2015 33–18 64.7% #26 1,984 0 1 2007 8–5 61.5% #106 1,656 0 0
23 2016 36–18 66.7% #23 2,034 0 1 2008 11–19 36.7% #144 1,608 0 0
24 2017 38–20 65.5% #8 1,992 0 4 2009 27–18 60.0% #34 1,828 0 0
25 2018 9–21 30.0% #106 1,716 0 4 2010 38–20 65.5% #19 1,882 0 1
26 2019 0–4 0.0% #253 1,634 0 4 2011 34–19 64.2% #18 2,021 0 3
27 2020 3–4 42.9% #253 1,725 0 4 2012 38–18 67.9% #14 1,965 0 5
28 2021 6–5 54.5% #145 1,775 0 4 2013 38–22 63.3% #14 1,983 0 7
29 2022 7–10 41.2% #131 1,746 0 4 2014 37–21 63.8% #19 1,922 0 9
30 2023 2–4 33.3% #671 1,716 0 4 2015 45–23 66.2% #11 2,026 0 10
31 — — — — — — — 2016 30–20 60.0% #19 2,019 0 10
32 — — — — — — — 2017 36–21 63.2% #17 1,984 0 12
33 — — — — — — — 2018 32–22 59.3% #10 1,956 0 14
34 — — — — — — — 2019 29–17 63.0% #19 1,921 0 15
35 — — — — — — — 2020 10–7 58.8% #25 1,845 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2021 23–11 67.6% #24 1,933 0 16
37 — — — — — — — 2022 22–16 57.9% #41 1,891 0 16
38 — — — — — — — 2023 9–14 39.1% #172 1,698 0 16