H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Jack Sock vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 1-0
Jack Sock holds a 1–0 lead over Marcos Baghdatis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jack Sock leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jack Sock won the 2016 Houston quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CYP
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2016* | Houston | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Jack Sock | 6-4 6-4 | Marcos Baghdatis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jack Sock | #808 | #8 | 3,165 | 2,127 | 177 | 147 | 54.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Marcos Baghdatis | #179 | #8 | 2,111 | 1,952 | 324 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jack Sock | Marcos Baghdatis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #878 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #381 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2012 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #150 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #102 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #55 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,893 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #12 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2015 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #26 | 1,984 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,937 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2016 | 36–18 | 66.7% | #23 | 2,034 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #98 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2017 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #8 | 1,992 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #42 | 1,810 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2018 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #106 | 1,716 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #20 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2019 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,634 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #44 | 1,844 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #253 | 1,725 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #36 | 1,897 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2021 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #145 | 1,775 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #87 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #131 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #85 | 1,703 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2023 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #671 | 1,716 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #46 | 1,869 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,884 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #124 | 1,723 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #179 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |