H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jack Sock vs Rajeev Ram H2H: 1-0

Jack Sock holds a 1–0 lead over Rajeev Ram in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jack Sock leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jack Sock won the 2014 Newport round of 16 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jack Sock
USA Age 33 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Rajeev Ram
USA Age 42 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jack Sock #76 7-5 6-2 Rajeev Ram #157 Match data Jul 11, 2014* R16 Newport ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jack Sock #808 #8 3,165 2,105 177 148 54.5% 0 1 0 0 3 4
Rajeev Ram #1,076 #56 826 1,747 57 94 37.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jack Sock Rajeev Ram
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2010 0–1 0.0% — 1,458 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2011 1–2 33.3% #381 1,489 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0
19 2012 5–7 41.7% #150 1,601 0 0 2003 1–1 50.0% — 1,492 0 0
20 2013 10–13 43.5% #102 1,696 0 0 2004 1–3 25.0% #297 1,474 0 0
21 2014 27–20 57.4% #42 1,893 0 0 2005 2–2 50.0% #195 1,490 0 0
22 2015 33–18 64.7% #26 1,984 0 1 2006 0–1 0.0% #197 1,457 0 0
23 2016 36–19 65.5% #23 2,024 0 1 2007 0–1 0.0% #253 1,417 0 0
24 2017 38–20 65.5% #8 1,986 0 4 2008 2–4 33.3% #190 1,478 0 0
25 2018 9–21 30.0% #106 1,715 0 4 2009 8–6 57.1% #79 1,587 0 1
26 2019 0–4 0.0% #253 1,634 0 4 2010 6–18 25.0% #184 1,591 0 1
27 2020 3–4 42.9% #253 1,725 0 4 2011 2–3 40.0% #149 1,606 0 1
28 2021 6–5 54.5% #145 1,775 0 4 2012 7–9 43.8% #132 1,636 0 1
29 2022 7–10 41.2% #131 1,747 0 4 2013 4–11 26.7% #127 1,646 0 1
30 2023 2–4 33.3% #671 1,716 0 4 2014 3–7 30.0% #139 1,660 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2015 7–6 53.8% #89 1,654 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2016 12–19 38.7% #129 1,616 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2017 2–2 50.0% #353 1,582 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jack Sock Rajeev Ram
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2012 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2013 7 10 17 41.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2014 18 15 33 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 2005 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2015 21 12 33 63.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2016 26 13 39 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2017 33 15 48 68.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
25 2018 7 14 21 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2009 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3%
26 2019 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 4 12 16 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
27 2020 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2011 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2021 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2012 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
29 2022 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2013 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
30 2023 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 5 0 5 100.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 9 11 20 45.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 129 109 238 54.2% 31 26 57 54.4% 17 13 30 56.7% — 34 71 105 32.4% 4 7 11 36.4% 19 16 35 54.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 322/325 of Jack Sock's and 150/151 of Rajeev Ram's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jack Sock Rajeev Ram
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2010 1/1 4.0 7.0 55.1% 63.3% 57.5% 54.5% 66.7% 60.7% 30.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 3/3 8.7 4.0 54.7% 65.2% 50.8% 31.0% 29.1% 59.4% 35.0% 2002 1/1 3.0 3.0 41.5% 55.6% 47.4% 60.0% 50.0% 50.8% 31.6%
19 2012 12/12 9.5 5.9 55.2% 71.3% 52.4% 69.4% 30.1% 63.0% 34.3% 2003 2/2 4.5 7.0 45.7% 78.9% 42.5% 55.0% 52.8% 59.1% 39.8%
20 2013 23/23 7.0 5.2 55.0% 75.0% 51.5% 60.4% 55.3% 64.5% 34.9% 2004 4/4 4.8 5.0 54.3% 75.1% 44.7% 56.9% 44.6% 61.5% 28.2%
21 2014 47/47 6.4 3.9 58.3% 76.5% 54.5% 68.2% 49.3% 67.5% 34.6% 2005 4/4 11.3 3.8 54.9% 75.5% 45.8% 56.4% 54.3% 62.1% 34.7%
22 2015 50/51 6.1 5.2 56.9% 75.9% 53.0% 63.5% 47.5% 66.2% 35.3% 2006 1/1 2.0 1.0 68.9% 74.5% 34.8% 0.0% 100.0% 62.2% 26.5%
23 2016 54/55 6.7 3.7 58.3% 75.8% 55.2% 67.7% 37.5% 67.2% 36.5% 2007 1/1 6.0 4.0 59.0% 71.4% 52.9% 55.6% 33.3% 63.9% 41.8%
24 2017 57/58 6.8 4.0 59.7% 72.8% 52.4% 56.9% 40.8% 64.7% 36.3% 2008 6/6 6.0 1.5 63.5% 69.6% 41.8% 45.8% 44.2% 59.3% 32.5%
25 2018 30/30 6.3 4.3 61.2% 73.0% 51.0% 58.6% 36.7% 64.5% 34.7% 2009 14/14 9.1 2.6 58.3% 77.3% 53.3% 73.2% 36.0% 67.3% 33.0%
26 2019 4/4 10.8 4.5 63.0% 70.4% 49.7% 44.3% 62.5% 62.7% 28.6% 2010 24/24 10.2 3.3 58.5% 71.2% 47.0% 42.4% 32.4% 61.1% 28.1%
27 2020 7/7 5.6 4.7 60.6% 69.1% 51.8% 48.5% 45.2% 62.2% 35.7% 2011 5/5 4.2 2.0 62.1% 70.2% 44.7% 44.7% 54.2% 61.1% 30.3%
28 2021 11/11 8.5 3.8 59.3% 75.1% 47.0% 61.1% 46.0% 63.8% 36.2% 2012 16/16 5.1 2.5 58.3% 74.9% 48.0% 58.8% 40.8% 63.4% 33.3%
29 2022 17/17 6.2 3.7 64.8% 70.1% 48.6% 58.5% 40.9% 62.8% 35.7% 2013 15/15 7.4 2.6 61.6% 69.7% 46.1% 58.8% 39.6% 60.8% 33.6%
30 2023 6/6 6.0 5.5 56.9% 72.8% 47.5% 70.6% 31.7% 61.8% 33.8% 2014 10/10 6.1 2.8 62.0% 70.2% 48.9% 62.0% 32.6% 62.2% 31.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 13/13 9.8 2.4 63.0% 75.6% 53.0% 65.0% 44.1% 67.1% 31.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 30/31 7.2 3.0 63.5% 72.6% 50.5% 60.9% 35.2% 64.4% 33.3%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 4/4 6.8 4.3 55.8% 74.6% 53.0% 69.8% 22.4% 65.2% 32.7%
Career — 322/325 6.7 4.3 58.6% 74.2% 52.6% 62.1% 43.2% 65.3% 35.4% — 150/151 7.6 2.9 60.2% 72.8% 48.6% 57.4% 38.6% 63.1% 32.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jack Sock Rajeev Ram
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2010 1458 94.9 -2.51 -1.84 0.774 45.3% — — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — +0.07 2001 1486 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 1490 107.8 -1.04 +0.61 0.863 46.9% +9 — — 33.3% -1.00 — 0–1 — +0.29 2002 1479 99.7 +2.35 +0.19 0.641 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.13
19 2012 1602 120.6 -0.99 -1.79 0.926 48.9% +18 — — 43.3% -0.67 2–3 (40%) 4–3 (57%) — +1.03 2003 1493 105.3 -0.85 +0.13 0.972 50.4% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.02
20 2013 1696 140.5 +0.25 -0.25 0.983 50.1% -7 -46 — 47.2% -0.25 1–6 (14%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.01 2004 1474 102.9 -3.28 -0.64 0.731 44.5% +28 — — 27.3% -1.55 1–0 1–1 — +0.23
21 2014 1894 151.5 +2.13 +0.15 1.067 51.5% -36 -152 -188 56.5% +0.46 4–6 (40%) 10–11 (48%) — +0.38 2005 1490 105.6 -0.27 -2.37 0.916 49.5% +13 — — 54.5% 0.00 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.22
22 2015 1985 166.3 +2.00 +0.71 1.042 51.0% -7 -65 -218 61.0% +0.61 11–5 (69%) 16–13 (55%) — -0.24 2006 1458 100.0 +0.64 -0.34 0.700 45.1% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.05
23 2016 2024 160.1 +2.86 +1.03 1.112 51.3% +3 -111 -222 60.1% +0.45 13–6 (68%) 17–13 (57%) — +1.63 2007 1418 101.5 -4.12 -2.14 1.157 51.3% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.10
24 2017 1987 164.2 +1.24 +1.03 1.028 50.3% +39 -114 — 58.8% +0.23 18–9 (67%) 22–9 (71%) — +1.66 2008 1479 114.5 -1.05 -1.49 0.798 46.4% +22 — — 40.0% -0.80 0–1 3–3 (50%) — +0.19
25 2018 1716 137.8 +0.06 -1.43 0.976 49.6% +74 +66 — 43.4% -0.47 1–13 (7%) 8–7 (53%) — +2.03 2009 1587 122.4 +1.13 -1.70 1.010 50.2% -72 — +148 52.8% +0.11 3–1 (75%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.97
26 2019 1634 108.9 -0.40 -1.52 0.767 45.8% +41 — — 9.1% -1.91 — 0–3 (0%) — +0.14 2010 1592 116.0 -1.64 -5.51 0.722 44.9% -24 — +108 33.3% -1.42 3–6 (33%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.56
27 2020 1726 125.6 -1.79 -0.20 0.944 48.3% -53 — — 40.9% -0.73 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.22 2011 1606 115.8 -0.85 -2.60 0.778 45.9% +3 — — 50.0% -0.50 1–1 0–1 — +0.01
28 2021 1776 133.5 -0.49 -0.16 1.000 50.1% -49 — -56 53.6% +0.36 3–3 (50%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.96 2012 1636 116.2 -0.05 -3.04 0.910 48.7% -41 — +70 46.9% -0.37 0–1 4–3 (57%) — +1.50
29 2022 1747 131.6 -0.95 -0.13 0.959 49.5% -34 — +59 52.3% -0.23 1–6 (14%) 5–5 (50%) — -1.19 2013 1647 124.3 -1.42 -2.56 0.856 47.5% -6 — +7 40.0% -0.65 0–5 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.29
30 2023 1717 116.0 +0.17 -0.95 0.884 48.4% -15 — — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.24 2014 1661 116.5 -1.88 -1.96 0.844 47.1% 0 — — 30.4% -1.13 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.65
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1654 122.8 +0.37 -2.07 0.944 49.7% -77 — +184 52.8% -0.14 4–3 (57%) 8–3 (73%) — +0.64
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1617 133.1 -0.28 -2.91 0.934 49.1% +29 -87 +110 40.3% -0.65 3–4 (43%) 12–5 (71%) — +0.66
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1583 110.5 +0.38 -1.49 0.939 48.0% — -27 — 44.4% -0.78 1–0 2–0 — +0.44
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1563 95.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1551 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2105 157.4 +1.18 +0.22 1.020 50.4% +5 -78 -125 53.7% +0.11 57–60 (49%) 90–78 (54%) 100.6 +1.35 — 1748 123.1 -0.63 -2.79 0.869 47.8% -13 -67 +107 41.7% -0.67 18–26 (41%) 44–31 (59%) 104.5 +4.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.