H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jack Sock vs Thomas Fabbiano H2H: 1-0

Jack Sock holds a 1–0 lead over Thomas Fabbiano in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jack Sock leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jack Sock won the 2018 Indian Wells Open second round 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jack Sock
USA Age 33 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Thomas Fabbiano
ITA Age 37 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jack Sock #10 6-2 7-5 Thomas Fabbiano #77 Match data Mar 11, 2018* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jack Sock #808 #8 3,165 2,105 177 148 54.5% 0 1 0 0 3 4
Thomas Fabbiano #1,768 #70 715 1,748 27 63 30.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jack Sock Thomas Fabbiano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2010 0–1 0.0% — 1,458 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2011 1–2 33.3% #381 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2012 5–7 41.7% #150 1,601 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #371 1,533 0 0
20 2013 10–13 43.5% #102 1,696 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2014 27–20 57.4% #42 1,893 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #313 1,552 0 0
22 2015 33–18 64.7% #26 1,984 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 2016 36–19 65.5% #23 2,024 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 2017 38–20 65.5% #8 1,986 0 4 2013 0–1 0.0% #180 1,543 0 0
25 2018 9–21 30.0% #106 1,715 0 4 — — — — — — —
26 2019 0–4 0.0% #253 1,634 0 4 2015 0–3 0.0% #157 1,602 0 0
27 2020 3–4 42.9% #253 1,725 0 4 2016 5–10 33.3% #124 1,613 0 0
28 2021 6–5 54.5% #145 1,775 0 4 2017 4–12 25.0% #73 1,593 0 0
29 2022 7–10 41.2% #131 1,747 0 4 2018 8–12 40.0% #101 1,670 0 0
30 2023 2–4 33.3% #671 1,716 0 4 2019 10–18 35.7% #114 1,638 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2020 0–1 0.0% #172 1,593 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2021 0–3 0.0% #204 1,517 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2022 0–1 0.0% #317 1,526 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jack Sock Thomas Fabbiano
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2013 7 10 17 41.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 18 15 33 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2015 21 12 33 63.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2016 26 13 39 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2017 33 15 48 68.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2018 7 14 21 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2019 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
27 2020 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
28 2021 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2017 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
29 2022 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2018 3 7 10 30.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 1 3 66.7%
30 2023 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2019 3 9 12 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 129 109 238 54.2% 31 26 57 54.4% 17 13 30 56.7% — 13 37 50 26.0% 6 20 26 23.1% 8 6 14 57.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 322/325 of Jack Sock's and 89/90 of Thomas Fabbiano's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jack Sock Thomas Fabbiano
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2010 1/1 4.0 7.0 55.1% 63.3% 57.5% 54.5% 66.7% 60.7% 30.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 3/3 8.7 4.0 54.7% 65.2% 50.8% 31.0% 29.1% 59.4% 35.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 12/12 9.5 5.9 55.2% 71.3% 52.4% 69.4% 30.1% 63.0% 34.3% 2008 1/1 3.0 6.0 69.4% 66.2% 52.9% 40.0% 16.7% 62.2% 31.9%
20 2013 23/23 7.0 5.2 55.0% 75.0% 51.5% 60.4% 55.3% 64.5% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 47/47 6.4 3.9 58.3% 76.5% 54.5% 68.2% 49.3% 67.5% 34.6% 2010 1/1 3.0 2.0 52.9% 59.5% 51.5% 40.0% — 55.7% 21.7%
22 2015 50/51 6.1 5.2 56.9% 75.9% 53.0% 63.5% 47.5% 66.2% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2016 54/55 6.7 3.7 58.3% 75.8% 55.2% 67.7% 37.5% 67.2% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2017 57/58 6.8 4.0 59.7% 72.8% 52.4% 56.9% 40.8% 64.7% 36.3% 2013 1/1 0.0 7.0 66.1% 63.9% 45.9% 75.0% 20.0% 57.8% 25.5%
25 2018 30/30 6.3 4.3 61.2% 73.0% 51.0% 58.6% 36.7% 64.5% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2019 4/4 10.8 4.5 63.0% 70.4% 49.7% 44.3% 62.5% 62.7% 28.6% 2015 3/3 1.7 3.0 68.2% 62.0% 39.1% 50.0% 42.6% 54.6% 31.2%
27 2020 7/7 5.6 4.7 60.6% 69.1% 51.8% 48.5% 45.2% 62.2% 35.7% 2016 14/15 2.0 2.6 67.4% 62.9% 44.7% 54.2% 44.3% 56.9% 38.3%
28 2021 11/11 8.5 3.8 59.3% 75.1% 47.0% 61.1% 46.0% 63.8% 36.2% 2017 16/16 1.8 3.7 63.4% 64.2% 46.4% 46.3% 25.5% 57.8% 36.2%
29 2022 17/17 6.2 3.7 64.8% 70.1% 48.6% 58.5% 40.9% 62.8% 35.7% 2018 20/20 1.9 3.4 63.5% 62.7% 51.0% 62.6% 43.4% 58.0% 38.8%
30 2023 6/6 6.0 5.5 56.9% 72.8% 47.5% 70.6% 31.7% 61.8% 33.8% 2019 28/28 2.3 3.1 65.8% 67.2% 51.4% 55.8% 37.5% 61.8% 34.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 1/1 1.0 0.0 59.5% 52.0% 29.4% 37.5% 14.3% 42.9% 38.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 3/3 1.7 2.7 69.5% 61.6% 54.2% 64.8% 30.0% 59.3% 37.4%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 1/1 0.0 2.0 70.1% 61.7% 40.0% 42.9% 66.7% 55.2% 32.8%
Career — 322/325 6.7 4.3 58.6% 74.2% 52.6% 62.1% 43.2% 65.3% 35.4% — 89/90 2.0 3.2 65.2% 64.2% 48.6% 55.0% 36.9% 58.7% 36.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jack Sock Thomas Fabbiano
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2010 1458 94.9 -2.51 -1.84 0.774 45.3% — — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 1490 107.8 -1.04 +0.61 0.863 46.9% +9 — — 33.3% -1.00 — 0–1 — +0.29 2007 1491 96.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 1602 120.6 -0.99 -1.79 0.926 48.9% +18 — — 43.3% -0.67 2–3 (40%) 4–3 (57%) — +1.03 2008 1533 103.8 -4.31 -0.06 0.843 46.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.04
20 2013 1696 140.5 +0.25 -0.25 0.983 50.1% -7 -46 — 47.2% -0.25 1–6 (14%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.01 2009 1510 100.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2014 1894 151.5 +2.13 +0.15 1.067 51.5% -36 -152 -188 56.5% +0.46 4–6 (40%) 10–11 (48%) — +0.38 2010 1553 109.4 +0.96 +1.43 0.491 42.2% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.19
22 2015 1985 166.3 +2.00 +0.71 1.042 51.0% -7 -65 -218 61.0% +0.61 11–5 (69%) 16–13 (55%) — -0.24 2011 1497 93.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2016 2024 160.1 +2.86 +1.03 1.112 51.3% +3 -111 -222 60.1% +0.45 13–6 (68%) 17–13 (57%) — +1.63 2012 1521 107.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2017 1987 164.2 +1.24 +1.03 1.028 50.3% +39 -114 — 58.8% +0.23 18–9 (67%) 22–9 (71%) — +1.66 2013 1543 110.3 -3.11 +6.63 0.605 42.9% — — — 0.0% -2.33 — 0–1 — -0.16
25 2018 1716 137.8 +0.06 -1.43 0.976 49.6% +74 +66 — 43.4% -0.47 1–13 (7%) 8–7 (53%) — +2.03 2014 1468 96.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2019 1634 108.9 -0.40 -1.52 0.767 45.8% +41 — — 9.1% -1.91 — 0–3 (0%) — +0.14 2015 1602 120.4 -2.44 -1.27 0.687 42.9% — +25 — 0.0% -2.67 — 0–1 — -0.11
27 2020 1726 125.6 -1.79 -0.20 0.944 48.3% -53 — — 40.9% -0.73 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.22 2016 1614 119.3 -3.97 +0.55 0.888 47.8% +10 -40 — 33.3% -1.28 2–2 (50%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.75
28 2021 1776 133.5 -0.49 -0.16 1.000 50.1% -49 — -56 53.6% +0.36 3–3 (50%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.96 2017 1594 119.6 -4.29 -0.09 0.859 46.6% -7 — +27 28.6% -1.40 1–2 (33%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.33
29 2022 1747 131.6 -0.95 -0.13 0.959 49.5% -34 — +59 52.3% -0.23 1–6 (14%) 5–5 (50%) — -1.19 2018 1670 125.6 -3.67 +1.00 0.923 48.5% -120 -92 +67 42.9% -0.43 3–4 (43%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.17
30 2023 1717 116.0 +0.17 -0.95 0.884 48.4% -15 — — 40.0% -0.73 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.24 2019 1638 126.4 -2.10 -0.50 0.905 48.2% -70 -79 +175 41.9% -0.49 5–10 (33%) 9–8 (53%) — +0.38
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1593 101.2 -3.13 -2.21 0.679 40.4% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.05
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1517 108.6 -1.11 +1.49 0.920 48.4% — — — 33.3% -0.56 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.21
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1526 114.6 +1.39 -0.86 0.732 44.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.17
Career — 2105 157.4 +1.18 +0.22 1.020 50.4% +5 -78 -125 53.7% +0.11 57–60 (49%) 90–78 (54%) 100.6 +1.35 — 1749 121.9 -3.09 +0.20 0.876 47.5% -45 -61 +120 35.6% -0.90 11–22 (33%) 17–26 (40%) 92.2 +0.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.