H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jack Sock vs Tommy Haas H2H: 2-1

Jack Sock holds a 2–1 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Jack Sock leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jack Sock won the 2017 Houston fourth round 6-4 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jack Sock
USA Age 33 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 14, 2017* Houston ATP 250 R16 Clay Jack Sock #16 6-4 3-6 6-3 Tommy Haas #826 Match data
Jan 9, 2014* Auckland ATP 250 R16 Hard Jack Sock #100 6-4 6-4 Tommy Haas #12 Match data
May 30, 2013* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Tommy Haas #14 7-6(3) 6-2 7-5 Jack Sock #118 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jack Sock #808 #8 3,165 2,127 177 147 54.6% 0 1 0 0 3 4
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jack Sock Tommy Haas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2010 0–1 0.0% #878 1,458 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2011 1–2 33.3% #381 1,490 0 0 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0
19 2012 5–7 41.7% #150 1,601 0 0 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0
20 2013 10–13 43.5% #102 1,697 0 0 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0
21 2014 27–20 57.4% #42 1,893 0 0 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1
22 2015 33–18 64.7% #26 1,984 0 1 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1
23 2016 36–18 66.7% #23 2,034 0 1 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5
24 2017 38–20 65.5% #8 1,992 0 4 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5
25 2018 9–21 30.0% #106 1,716 0 4 — — — — — — —
26 2019 0–4 0.0% #253 1,634 0 4 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7
27 2020 3–4 42.9% #253 1,725 0 4 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7
28 2021 6–5 54.5% #145 1,775 0 4 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10
29 2022 7–10 41.2% #131 1,746 0 4 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11
30 2023 2–4 33.3% #671 1,716 0 4 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12
32 — — — — — — — 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12
33 — — — — — — — 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12
34 — — — — — — — 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13
35 — — — — — — — 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15
37 — — — — — — — 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
39 — — — — — — — 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15