H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Jaime Fillol vs Andrew Pattison H2H: 7-6

Jaime Fillol holds a 7–6 lead over Andrew Pattison in their ATP head-to-head. Across 13 main-draw meetings, Jaime Fillol leads 3–2 on carpet, while they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Andrew Pattison won the 1981 Swiss Open Gstaad round of 32 2-6 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jaime Fillol
CHI Age 80 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
7 – 6
13 main-draw meetings
Andrew Pattison
USA Age 77 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrew Pattison 2-6 6-1 6-3 Jaime Fillol #100 Match data Jul 9, 1981* R32 Swiss Open Gstaad ATP 250 Clay
Andrew Pattison 3-6 6-3 6-3 Jaime Fillol Match data Jan 19, 1979* R16 Baltimore Wct ATP 250 Carpet
Jaime Fillol #25 6-3 6-4 Andrew Pattison Match data Aug 21, 1977* R16 Canadian Open ATP 250 Clay
Jaime Fillol #26 6-8 7-5 10-8 Andrew Pattison Match data Jun 10, 1977* R16 Eastbourne Open ATP 250 Grass
Jaime Fillol 6-4 6-7 6-4 Andrew Pattison Match data Feb 14, 1976* F Dayton ATP 250 Carpet
Jaime Fillol #25 4-6 6-3 6-2 Andrew Pattison Match data Apr 17, 1975* R32 Denver Wct ATP 250 Carpet
Andrew Pattison 4-6 6-3 6-4 Jaime Fillol Match data Mar 27, 1975* R32 Orlando Wct ATP 250 Hard
Jaime Fillol #18 3-6 7-6 6-2 6-2 Andrew Pattison Match data Dec 1, 1973* R16 South African Open ATP 250 Hard
Jaime Fillol 7-6(2) 7-5 Andrew Pattison Match data Apr 19, 1973* QF Johannesburg Wct ATP 250 Hard
Jaime Fillol 6-2 6-4 Andrew Pattison Match data Apr 5, 1973* R32 Munich Wct ATP 250 Carpet
Andrew Pattison 6-3 6-7(1) 6-1 Jaime Fillol Match data Jan 25, 1973* R32 Lacosta Wct ATP 250 Hard
Andrew Pattison 6-3 6-3 Jaime Fillol Match data Sep 30, 1972* QF Albany ATP 250 Carpet
Andrew Pattison 2-6 6-2 7-5 Jaime Fillol Match data Aug 20, 1972* SF Canadian Open ATP 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jaime Fillol #794 #14 — 2,063 534 364 59.5% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Andrew Pattison — — — 1,979 — — — 0 0 0 0 4 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jaime Fillol Andrew Pattison
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
22 1968 26–9 74.3% — 1,645 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1969 27–19 58.7% — 1,666 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 1970 32–23 58.2% — 1,751 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 1971 43–21 67.2% — 1,774 0 3 — — — — — — —
26 1972 44–32 57.9% — 1,744 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 1973 51–33 60.7% #17 1,872 0 4 — — — — — — —
28 1974 46–31 59.7% #31 1,833 0 4 — — — — — — —
29 1975 60–26 69.8% #16 1,975 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 1976 50–28 64.1% #24 1,971 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 1977 46–22 67.6% #24 1,901 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 1978 32–27 54.2% #77 1,762 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 1979 21–28 42.9% #124 1,736 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 1980 10–22 31.2% #86 1,644 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 1981 18–19 48.6% #95 1,657 0 7 — — — — — — —
36 1982 14–8 63.6% #77 1,708 0 8 — — — — — — —
37 1983 14–16 46.7% #85 1,651 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jaime Fillol Andrew Pattison
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 3 3 6 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
22 1968 — — — — 14 3 17 82.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1971 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 1969 7 5 12 58.3% 13 6 19 68.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1972 6 6 12 50.0% 19 8 27 70.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 9 2 11 81.8%
24 1970 12 9 21 57.1% 12 5 17 70.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1973 10 7 17 58.8% 10 11 21 47.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 8 13 38.5%
25 1971 21 8 29 72.4% 10 6 16 62.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1974 14 4 18 77.8% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 0 2 100.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
26 1972 17 11 28 60.7% 13 9 22 59.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 9 8 17 52.9% 1975 8 6 14 57.1% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 6 10 40.0%
27 1973 17 14 31 54.8% 25 10 35 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 1976 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 15 11 26 57.7%
28 1974 11 8 19 57.9% 26 15 41 63.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1977 11 9 20 55.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2%
29 1975 9 7 16 56.3% 41 13 54 75.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1978 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
30 1976 5 3 8 62.5% 34 16 50 68.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 1979 13 7 20 65.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 7 14 50.0%
31 1977 4 3 7 57.1% 34 13 47 72.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1980 9 5 14 64.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 9 16 43.8%
32 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 21 15 36 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
33 1979 7 9 16 43.8% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1982 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1 5 6 16.7%
34 1980 5 10 15 33.3% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 1983 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
35 1981 2 2 4 50.0% 16 14 30 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1982 5 3 8 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1983 5 8 13 38.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 130 104 234 55.6% 285 153 438 65.1% 56 45 101 55.4% 63 62 125 50.4% — 96 79 175 54.9% 63 60 123 51.2% 30 28 58 51.7% 67 70 137 48.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jaime Fillol Andrew Pattison
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1450 97.3 — — — — -2 — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.04
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1473 107.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.07
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1495 118.6 — — — — +83 +19 -13 35.2% -0.83 0–3 (0%) — — -0.34
22 1968 1645 119.6 — — — — -75 +81 -43 67.7% +1.18 9–4 (69%) — — +1.11 1971 1586 125.4 — — — — +32 — -50 49.0% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 100.8 -0.46
23 1969 1667 119.9 — — — — +17 +50 -33 55.4% +0.51 8–8 (50%) — — +1.81 1972 1840 143.1 — — — — -75 -2 -227 62.3% +0.95 9–5 (64%) 6–2 (75%) 109.4 +0.22
24 1970 1752 130.4 — — — — +6 +20 -71 53.1% +0.21 12–5 (71%) 4–5 (44%) 103.8 -0.35 1973 1772 131.9 — — — — -44 +3 -85 48.5% -0.10 8–7 (53%) 7–11 (39%) 99.9 -2.65
25 1971 1774 132.9 — — — — +93 -19 -22 59.9% +0.74 16–10 (62%) 4–6 (40%) 101.1 +2.68 1974 1923 152.3 — — — — -14 -59 — 66.0% +1.30 8–3 (73%) 4–1 (80%) 109.2 -1.00
26 1972 1744 130.3 — — — — +53 +10 +38 58.2% +0.57 7–15 (32%) 15–14 (52%) 93.3 +7.01 1975 1934 141.2 — — — — -77 -17 -175 54.2% +0.23 7–8 (47%) 5–4 (56%) 99.9 -1.91
27 1973 1873 139.9 — — — — -33 +32 — 59.6% +0.60 15–12 (56%) 17–17 (50%) 101.4 -0.71 1976 1821 146.5 — — — — +15 — — 42.5% -0.37 9–4 (69%) 6–7 (46%) 103.6 -2.94
28 1974 1833 145.7 — — — — -2 +31 0 56.6% +0.59 16–12 (57%) 6–12 (33%) 95.2 -4.09 1977 1774 143.4 — — — — +32 +17 -27 51.1% +0.14 10–9 (53%) 14–6 (70%) 105.5 -2.22
29 1975 1975 157.8 — — — — -83 +56 -137 63.3% +0.92 17–9 (65%) 11–10 (52%) 105.2 -5.98 1978 1708 135.0 — — — — +19 +74 — 47.2% +0.19 4–3 (57%) 5–6 (45%) 101.7 +1.01
30 1976 1972 157.9 — — — — -26 +33 -116 58.9% +0.79 22–7 (76%) 7–17 (29%) 99.3 -4.07 1979 1778 133.4 — — — — +31 -65 -60 49.1% +0.01 11–5 (69%) 4–7 (36%) 104.1 -0.12
31 1977 1902 145.9 — — — — -65 +78 -56 61.2% +0.52 14–3 (82%) 11–5 (69%) 111.7 +0.66 1980 1732 146.9 — — — — +51 -26 +6 50.0% +0.07 4–3 (57%) 6–11 (35%) 97.6 -3.35
32 1978 1763 140.0 — — — — -7 +59 +95 54.2% +0.18 11–14 (44%) 8–5 (62%) 92.5 -4.40 1981 1689 126.4 — — — — +45 -39 — 40.5% -0.60 4–2 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 103.5 +0.16
33 1979 1737 136.4 — — — — -7 +55 +28 42.4% -0.36 11–7 (61%) 5–7 (42%) 102.8 -2.01 1982 1622 121.6 — — — — +11 — — 36.1% -1.17 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.3 +0.19
34 1980 1644 125.6 — — — — +4 +66 — 34.2% -1.03 7–6 (54%) 4–10 (29%) 97.9 -0.58 1983 1603 95.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.25
35 1981 1657 140.6 — — — — -45 +98 — 48.4% -0.06 6–6 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 100.4 +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1982 1709 120.8 — — — — +30 +2 — 56.1% +0.35 5–1 (83%) 6–7 (46%) 102.5 +3.91 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1983 1651 131.3 — — — — +1 +102 — 48.1% +0.08 4–5 (44%) 3–5 (38%) 95.2 +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2064 144.5 — — — — +1 +50 -25 56.2% +0.46 180–124 (59%) 107–125 (46%) 98.7 -0.50 — 1980 145.1 — — — — +3 -7 -92 50.3% +0.11 78–59 (57%) 71–64 (53%) 108.6 -2.74

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.