H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jaime Fillol vs David Carter H2H: 1-1
Jaime Fillol and David Carter are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jaime Fillol leads 1–0 on clay, while David Carter leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Carter won the 1981 US Open first round 7-6 2-6 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 80
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 70
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 1981* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | David Carter | 7-6 2-6 7-6 6-2 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
| Mar 1, 1981* | Mexico City | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Jaime Fillol | 6-2 6-3 | David Carter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Fillol | #1,171 | #14 | 8 | 2,041 | 532 | 367 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| David Carter | #606 | #78 | 0 | 1,729 | 76 | 119 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Fillol | David Carter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #373 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #288 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #236 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1968 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #139 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1969 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1970 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #145 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1971 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #95 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1972 | 44–32 | 57.9% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #85 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1973 | 51–33 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #190 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1974 | 48–32 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1975 | 56–27 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1976 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #24 | 1,928 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1977 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1978 | 33–29 | 53.2% | #77 | 1,756 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1979 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #124 | 1,736 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1980 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1982 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #77 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1983 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,649 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |