H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jaime Fillol vs Harold Solomon H2H: 3-4

Harold Solomon holds a 4–3 lead over Jaime Fillol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Jaime Fillol leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Harold Solomon leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Harold Solomon won the 1981 Washington second round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jaime Fillol
CHI Age 80 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Harold Solomon
USA Age 73 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 22, 1981* Washington ATP 250 R64 Clay Harold Solomon #10 6-4 6-3 Jaime Fillol #96 Match data
Aug 15, 1979* Montreal / Toronto Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jaime Fillol #100 3-6 7-5 6-2 Harold Solomon #8 Match data
Feb 25, 1977* Palm Springs ATP 250 R16 Hard Harold Solomon #9 6-1 6-2 Jaime Fillol #22 Match data
Aug 7, 1976* Louisville ATP 250 QF Clay Harold Solomon #12 6-2 6-4 Jaime Fillol #15 Match data
Nov 2, 1974* Paris Indoor ATP 250 QF Hard Jaime Fillol #23 6-2 7-5 Harold Solomon #14 Match data
Oct 12, 1973* Fort Worth ATP 250 QF Hard Jaime Fillol #23 6-2 4-6 6-3 Harold Solomon #62 Match data
May 17, 1972* Brussels ATP 250 R32 Clay Harold Solomon 6-3 6-2 Jaime Fillol Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jaime Fillol #1,171 #14 8 2,041 532 367 59.2% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Harold Solomon #1,115 #5 2 2,161 578 334 63.4% 0 2 0 0 20 22

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jaime Fillol Harold Solomon
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1970 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1971 8–6 57.1% — 1,591 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1972 12–11 52.2% — 1,680 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1973 21–23 47.7% #59 1,767 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1974 61–39 61.0% #16 1,899 0 1
22 1968 30–10 75.0% — 1,658 0 1 1975 71–32 68.9% #17 1,983 0 5
23 1969 27–19 58.7% — 1,673 0 1 1976 72–29 71.3% #8 2,041 0 10
24 1970 32–23 58.2% — 1,749 0 1 1977 64–26 71.1% #14 2,001 0 13
25 1971 43–21 67.2% — 1,774 0 3 1978 70–33 68.0% #9 1,903 0 15
26 1972 44–32 57.9% — 1,745 0 3 1979 65–23 73.9% #8 1,999 0 18
27 1973 51–33 60.7% #17 1,867 0 4 1980 64–23 73.6% #7 1,991 0 22
28 1974 48–32 60.0% #31 1,830 0 4 1981 31–26 54.4% #21 1,757 0 22
29 1975 56–27 67.5% #16 1,962 0 4 1982 22–23 48.9% #66 1,797 0 22
30 1976 47–27 63.5% #24 1,928 0 5 1983 5–17 22.7% #95 1,622 0 22
31 1977 44–21 67.7% #24 1,894 0 5 1984 4–6 40.0% #223 1,632 0 22
32 1978 33–29 53.2% #77 1,756 0 5 1985 4–6 40.0% #106 1,614 0 22
33 1979 21–28 42.9% #124 1,736 0 5 1986 4–8 33.3% #240 1,593 0 22
34 1980 10–22 31.2% #86 1,644 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 1981 18–19 48.6% #95 1,654 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 1982 14–8 63.6% #77 1,707 0 7 — — — — — — —
37 1983 14–16 46.7% #85 1,649 0 7 — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — 1991 0–1 0.0% #1106 1,573 0 22