H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jaime Fillol vs Haroon Rahim H2H: 2-3
Haroon Rahim holds a 3–2 lead over Jaime Fillol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Haroon Rahim leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Haroon Rahim won the 1976 Los Angeles second round 6-7 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 80
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
3
5 main draw meetings
PAK
Age 76
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 1976* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Haroon Rahim | 6-7 7-6 6-4 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
| Oct 15, 1974* | Madrid | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Jaime Fillol | 6-1 6-1 | Haroon Rahim | Match data |
| Mar 22, 1972* | Caracas | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Haroon Rahim | 7-6 6-4 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
| Aug 4, 1971* | Columbus | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Haroon Rahim | 6-4 6-2 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
| Aug 22, 1970* | Merion | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Jaime Fillol | 6-3 5-7 7-6 | Haroon Rahim | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Fillol | #1,171 | #14 | 8 | 2,041 | 532 | 367 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Haroon Rahim | #130 | #34 | 0 | 1,855 | 148 | 176 | 45.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Fillol | Haroon Rahim | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 17–17 | 50.0% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1968 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 32–38 | 45.7% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1969 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 20–34 | 37.0% | #90 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1970 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #123 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1971 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #74 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1972 | 44–32 | 57.9% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #49 | 1,807 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1973 | 51–33 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1974 | 48–32 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1975 | 56–27 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1976 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #24 | 1,928 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1977 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1978 | 33–29 | 53.2% | #77 | 1,756 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1979 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #124 | 1,736 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1980 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1982 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #77 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1983 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,649 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |