H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jaime Fillol vs Phil Dent H2H: 4-1

Jaime Fillol holds a 4–1 lead over Phil Dent in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Jaime Fillol leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jaime Fillol won the 1981 Tampa round of 16 7-6 1-6 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jaime Fillol
CHI Age 80 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Phil Dent
AUS Age 76 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jaime Fillol 7-6 1-6 7-6 Phil Dent #50 Match data Mar 13, 1981* R16 Tampa ATP 250 Hard
Jaime Fillol #25 6-3 6-3 Phil Dent #22 Match data Aug 22, 1977* SF Canadian Open ATP 250 Clay
Jaime Fillol 7-5 6-2 Phil Dent Match data Feb 13, 1976* SF Dayton ATP 250 Carpet
Phil Dent 7-6(6) 6-2 Jaime Fillol Match data Feb 2, 1973* R16 Richmond Wct ATP 250 Carpet
Jaime Fillol 3-6 6-3 6-3 Phil Dent Match data Sep 23, 1971* R32 Los Angeles Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jaime Fillol #794 #14 — 2,063 534 364 59.5% 0 0 0 0 8 8
Phil Dent #726 #17 0 1,958 414 344 54.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jaime Fillol Phil Dent
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1968 21–15 58.3% — 1,588 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1969 24–22 52.2% — 1,578 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1970 19–15 55.9% — 1,652 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1971 28–33 45.9% — 1,673 0 1
22 1968 26–9 74.3% — 1,645 0 1 1972 5–22 18.5% — 1,610 0 1
23 1969 27–19 58.7% — 1,666 0 1 1973 38–31 55.1% #49 1,763 0 1
24 1970 32–23 58.2% — 1,751 0 1 1974 29–19 60.4% #41 1,829 0 1
25 1971 43–21 67.2% — 1,774 0 3 1975 41–26 61.2% #33 1,862 0 1
26 1972 44–32 57.9% — 1,744 0 3 1976 28–22 56.0% #37 1,852 0 1
27 1973 51–33 60.7% #17 1,872 0 4 1977 59–29 67.0% #20 1,851 0 1
28 1974 46–31 59.7% #31 1,833 0 4 1978 24–24 50.0% #87 1,744 0 1
29 1975 60–26 69.8% #16 1,975 0 5 1979 27–22 55.1% #50 1,854 0 3
30 1976 50–28 64.1% #24 1,971 0 6 1980 28–19 59.6% #34 1,846 0 3
31 1977 46–22 67.6% #24 1,901 0 6 1981 26–21 55.3% #65 1,753 0 3
32 1978 32–27 54.2% #77 1,762 0 6 1982 17–19 47.2% #57 1,727 0 3
33 1979 21–28 42.9% #124 1,736 0 6 1983 0–5 0.0% #100 1,639 0 3
34 1980 10–22 31.2% #86 1,644 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 1981 18–19 48.6% #95 1,657 0 7 — — — — — — —
36 1982 14–8 63.6% #77 1,708 0 8 — — — — — — —
37 1983 14–16 46.7% #85 1,651 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jaime Fillol Phil Dent
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 — — — — 11 9 20 55.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 0 1 1 0.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 15 13 28 53.6% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 3 1 4 75.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 15 10 25 60.0% 2 10 12 16.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0%
22 1968 — — — — 14 3 17 82.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1972 0 5 5 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 12 15 20.0%
23 1969 7 5 12 58.3% 13 6 19 68.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1973 10 8 18 55.6% 14 11 25 56.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 9 8 17 52.9%
24 1970 12 9 21 57.1% 12 5 17 70.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1974 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 9 7 16 56.3%
25 1971 21 8 29 72.4% 10 6 16 62.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 1975 5 5 10 50.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 12 8 20 60.0%
26 1972 17 11 28 60.7% 13 9 22 59.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 9 8 17 52.9% 1976 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 11 5 16 68.8% 8 11 19 42.1%
27 1973 17 14 31 54.8% 25 10 35 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 1977 8 6 14 57.1% 30 10 40 75.0% 18 8 26 69.2% 3 5 8 37.5%
28 1974 11 8 19 57.9% 26 15 41 63.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 10 9 19 52.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
29 1975 9 7 16 56.3% 41 13 54 75.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1979 6 6 12 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 19 6 25 76.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
30 1976 5 3 8 62.5% 34 16 50 68.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 1980 5 3 8 62.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 14 6 20 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
31 1977 4 3 7 57.1% 34 13 47 72.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1981 9 9 18 50.0% — — — — 12 6 18 66.7% 5 6 11 45.5%
32 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 21 15 36 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1982 4 7 11 36.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 7 11 36.4%
33 1979 7 9 16 43.8% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1983 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
34 1980 5 10 15 33.3% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1981 2 2 4 50.0% 16 14 30 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1982 5 3 8 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1983 5 8 13 38.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 130 104 234 55.6% 285 153 438 65.1% 56 45 101 55.4% 63 62 125 50.4% — 83 77 160 51.9% 115 96 211 54.5% 155 85 240 64.6% 61 86 147 41.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jaime Fillol Phil Dent
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1588 114.0 — — — — — -36 +44 53.1% +0.25 4–1 (80%) — — +1.13
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1579 111.6 — — — — +4 -23 +21 49.2% -0.10 9–4 (69%) — — +2.41
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1652 119.5 — — — — -10 -72 +3 53.8% +0.08 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +1.49
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1674 131.4 — — — — +49 -176 +55 47.3% -0.27 5–8 (38%) 11–12 (48%) — -2.30
22 1968 1645 119.6 — — — — -75 +81 -43 67.7% +1.18 9–4 (69%) — — +1.11 1972 1611 141.4 — — — — +3 -91 +77 29.7% -1.05 1–6 (14%) 1–5 (17%) — -3.31
23 1969 1667 119.9 — — — — +17 +50 -33 55.4% +0.51 8–8 (50%) — — +1.81 1973 1763 138.9 — — — — +15 -134 -89 54.9% +0.38 9–13 (41%) 10–9 (53%) — -0.93
24 1970 1752 130.4 — — — — +6 +20 -71 53.1% +0.21 12–5 (71%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.35 1974 1829 137.7 — — — — -83 -196 +77 60.2% +0.58 8–9 (47%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.62
25 1971 1774 132.9 — — — — +93 -19 -22 59.9% +0.74 16–10 (62%) 4–6 (40%) — +2.68 1975 1862 142.9 — — — — -95 -69 +80 56.9% +0.26 15–8 (65%) 12–7 (63%) — -3.62
26 1972 1744 130.3 — — — — +53 +10 +38 58.2% +0.57 7–15 (32%) 15–14 (52%) — +7.01 1976 1853 153.9 — — — — -3 -77 +101 56.3% +0.27 9–8 (53%) 6–4 (60%) — -1.73
27 1973 1873 139.9 — — — — -33 +32 — 59.6% +0.60 15–12 (56%) 17–17 (50%) — -0.71 1977 1852 146.1 — — — — -65 +78 +46 62.0% +0.61 18–9 (67%) 18–8 (69%) — -0.26
28 1974 1833 145.7 — — — — -2 +31 0 56.6% +0.59 16–12 (57%) 6–12 (33%) — -4.09 1978 1745 138.5 — — — — -25 +116 +104 48.4% -0.31 12–9 (57%) 11–5 (69%) — -1.73
29 1975 1975 157.8 — — — — -83 +56 -137 63.3% +0.92 17–9 (65%) 11–10 (52%) — -5.98 1979 1855 142.1 — — — — -193 -68 +147 55.3% +0.20 6–6 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.69
30 1976 1972 157.9 — — — — -26 +33 -116 58.9% +0.79 22–7 (76%) 7–17 (29%) — -4.07 1980 1847 138.9 — — — — -172 -94 +168 55.5% +0.29 11–6 (65%) 10–6 (63%) — +1.00
31 1977 1902 145.9 — — — — -65 +78 -56 61.2% +0.52 14–3 (82%) 11–5 (69%) — +0.66 1981 1753 130.9 — — — — -82 — +160 54.2% +0.21 9–11 (45%) 13–10 (57%) — +2.03
32 1978 1763 140.0 — — — — -7 +59 +95 54.2% +0.18 11–14 (44%) 8–5 (62%) — -4.40 1982 1728 146.8 — — — — -77 +60 +164 48.2% +0.09 3–8 (27%) 5–5 (50%) — -2.25
33 1979 1737 136.4 — — — — -7 +55 +28 42.4% -0.36 11–7 (61%) 5–7 (42%) — -2.01 1983 1639 101.1 — — — — -58 — — 15.4% -2.54 0–2 — — +0.07
34 1980 1644 125.6 — — — — +4 +66 — 34.2% -1.03 7–6 (54%) 4–10 (29%) — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1981 1657 140.6 — — — — -45 +98 — 48.4% -0.06 6–6 (50%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1982 1709 120.8 — — — — +30 +2 — 56.1% +0.35 5–1 (83%) 6–7 (46%) — +3.91 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1983 1651 131.3 — — — — +1 +102 — 48.1% +0.08 4–5 (44%) 3–5 (38%) — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2064 144.5 — — — — +1 +50 -25 56.2% +0.46 180–124 (59%) 107–125 (46%) 98.7 -0.50 — 1958 142.7 — — — — -47 -32 +79 53.4% +0.14 120–110 (52%) 115–90 (56%) 105.2 -1.08

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.