H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jaime Fillol vs Phil Dent H2H: 4-1
Jaime Fillol holds a 4–1 lead over Phil Dent in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Jaime Fillol leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jaime Fillol won the 1981 Tampa fourth round 7-6 1-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 80
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4
–
1
5 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 76
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 1981* | Tampa | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jaime Fillol | 7-6 1-6 7-6 | Phil Dent | Match data |
| Aug 22, 1977* | Toronto | Masters 1000 | SF | Clay | Jaime Fillol | 6-3 6-3 | Phil Dent | Match data |
| Feb 13, 1976* | Dayton | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Jaime Fillol | 7-5 6-2 | Phil Dent | Match data |
| Feb 2, 1973* | Richmond Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Phil Dent | 7-6(6) 6-2 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
| Sep 23, 1971* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jaime Fillol | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Phil Dent | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Fillol | #1,171 | #14 | 8 | 2,041 | 532 | 367 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Phil Dent | #726 | #17 | 0 | 1,953 | 418 | 351 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Fillol | Phil Dent | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 24–22 | 52.2% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 19–15 | 55.9% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 28–33 | 45.9% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1968 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 5–22 | 18.5% | — | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1969 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 38–31 | 55.1% | #49 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1970 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #41 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1971 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 42–27 | 60.9% | #33 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1972 | 44–32 | 57.9% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #37 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1973 | 51–33 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 4 | 1977 | 59–29 | 67.0% | #22 | 1,850 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1974 | 48–32 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #87 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1975 | 56–27 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #50 | 1,853 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1976 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #24 | 1,928 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #34 | 1,837 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1977 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #65 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 1978 | 33–29 | 53.2% | #77 | 1,756 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #57 | 1,726 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 1979 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #124 | 1,736 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #100 | 1,637 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | 1980 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1982 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #77 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1983 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,649 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |