H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jaime Fillol vs Tim Wilkison H2H: 1-1
Jaime Fillol and Tim Wilkison are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jaime Fillol leads 1–0 on clay, while Tim Wilkison leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Wilkison won the 1983 Guaruja third round 6-3 4-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 80
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 66
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 1983* | Guaruja | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Tim Wilkison | 6-3 4-6 6-0 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
| Aug 8, 1977 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jaime Fillol | 5-7 6-4 6-2 | Tim Wilkison | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Fillol | #1,171 | #14 | 8 | 2,041 | 532 | 367 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Tim Wilkison | #1,167 | #23 | 269 | 1,894 | 294 | 298 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Fillol | Tim Wilkison | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #114 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #54 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #95 | 1,684 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #71 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1968 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #61 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1969 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #88 | 1,678 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1970 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #39 | 1,765 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1971 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 36–28 | 56.2% | #44 | 1,807 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1972 | 44–32 | 57.9% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #29 | 1,771 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1973 | 51–33 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #55 | 1,729 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1974 | 48–32 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,672 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1975 | 56–27 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,599 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1976 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #24 | 1,928 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #210 | 1,540 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1977 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1978 | 33–29 | 53.2% | #77 | 1,756 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1979 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #124 | 1,736 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1178 | 1,522 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | 1980 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1982 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #77 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1983 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,649 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |