H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jaime Oncins vs Marcelo Filippini H2H: 1-1
Jaime Oncins and Marcelo Filippini are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marcelo Filippini leads 1–0 on clay, while Jaime Oncins leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jaime Oncins won the 1991 Sao Paulo third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
URU
Age 58
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 1991* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jaime Oncins | 7-5 6-2 | Marcelo Filippini | Match data |
| May 3, 1991* | Madrid | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Marcelo Filippini | 6-2 3-6 7-6(1) | Jaime Oncins | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Oncins | #1,034 | #34 | 773 | 1,796 | 61 | 86 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Marcelo Filippini | #967 | #30 | 971 | 1,799 | 217 | 229 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Oncins | Marcelo Filippini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #314 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #118 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #53 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1991 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #64 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #43 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1992 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #49 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1993 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #133 | 1,578 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #107 | 1,528 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1994 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #230 | 1,502 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #60 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,505 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #87 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,488 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #60 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1997 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,436 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,674 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #223 | 1,448 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #81 | 1,659 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #44 | 1,697 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #135 | 1,592 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,435 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,586 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #775 | 1,560 | 0 | 5 |