H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jaime Yzaga vs Alberto Berasategui H2H: 1-1
Jaime Yzaga and Alberto Berasategui are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alberto Berasategui leads 1–0 on clay, while Jaime Yzaga leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alberto Berasategui won the 1995 Barcelona third round 7-6(2) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 58
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 53
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 1995* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Alberto Berasategui | 7-6(2) 6-2 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
| Mar 16, 1995* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jaime Yzaga | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | Alberto Berasategui | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,870 | 238 | 205 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Alberto Berasategui | #1,019 | #7 | 2,532 | 1,982 | 276 | 195 | 58.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Alberto Berasategui | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #115 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #36 | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 64–26 | 71.1% | #8 | 1,908 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #32 | 1,761 | 0 | 9 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 39–27 | 59.1% | #23 | 1,733 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | 1998 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #21 | 1,649 | 0 | 14 |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,726 | 0 | 8 | 1999 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #61 | 1,739 | 0 | 14 |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,613 | 0 | 8 | 2000 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #153 | 1,563 | 0 | 14 |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,608 | 0 | 8 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #737 | 1,551 | 0 | 14 |