H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jaime Yzaga vs Francisco Roig H2H: 1-2
Francisco Roig holds a 2–1 lead over Jaime Yzaga in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Francisco Roig leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Francisco Roig won the 1992 Monte Carlo Masters second round 7-6(4) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 58
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 58
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 1992* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Francisco Roig | 7-6(4) 6-2 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
| Nov 10, 1989* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Francisco Roig | 6-7 7-6 7-6 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
| Nov 4, 1988* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jaime Yzaga | 6-0 6-1 | Francisco Roig | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,870 | 238 | 205 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Francisco Roig | #889 | #60 | 579 | 1,715 | 64 | 96 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Francisco Roig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #251 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #107 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #122 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #129 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #172 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,726 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #156 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,613 | 0 | 8 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,608 | 0 | 8 | 1996 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #116 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #153 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #333 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #798 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |