H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jaime Yzaga vs Marcelo Filippini H2H: 2-1
Jaime Yzaga holds a 2–1 lead over Marcelo Filippini in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jaime Yzaga leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcelo Filippini won the 1990 Itaparica fourth round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PER
Age 58
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
URU
Age 58
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 1990* | Itaparica | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Marcelo Filippini | 6-2 6-2 | Jaime Yzaga | Match data |
| Nov 25, 1989* | Itaparica | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Jaime Yzaga | 6-1 1-6 7-5 | Marcelo Filippini | Match data |
| Nov 25, 1988* | Itaparica | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jaime Yzaga | 1-6 7-5 6-0 | Marcelo Filippini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Yzaga | #381 | #18 | 1,391 | 1,870 | 238 | 205 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Marcelo Filippini | #967 | #30 | 971 | 1,799 | 217 | 229 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jaime Yzaga | Marcelo Filippini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #64 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #70 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #118 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #65 | 1,715 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #53 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #43 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1990 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #87 | 1,696 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #49 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1991 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #53 | 1,766 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #107 | 1,528 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #49 | 1,687 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #60 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1993 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #87 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #31 | 1,726 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #60 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1995 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #107 | 1,613 | 0 | 8 | 1995 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,674 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #379 | 1,608 | 0 | 8 | 1996 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #81 | 1,659 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #44 | 1,697 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #135 | 1,592 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,586 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #775 | 1,560 | 0 | 5 |