H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jakob Hlasek vs Emilio Sanchez H2H: 3-3

Jakob Hlasek and Emilio Sanchez are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay, while Jakob Hlasek leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Emilio Sanchez won the 1992 Rome Masters third round 6-4 7-6(6).

SUI Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 3
6 main draw meetings
ESP Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 14, 1992* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Emilio Sanchez #13 6-4 7-6(6) Jakob Hlasek #20 Match data
May 31, 1991* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Jakob Hlasek #20 6-3 4-6 6-2 7-6(5) Emilio Sanchez #11 Match data
Feb 6, 1987* Philadelphia ATP 250 R16 Carpet Jakob Hlasek #35 6-7 7-5 6-4 Emilio Sanchez #16 Match data
Aug 23, 1986* Cincinnati Masters 1000 R16 Hard Emilio Sanchez #19 7-6 6-4 Jakob Hlasek #27 Match data
Aug 2, 1986* Hilversum ATP 250 SF Clay Jakob Hlasek #28 6-4 7-6 Emilio Sanchez #18 Match data
Jul 12, 1986* Gstaad ATP 250 QF Clay Emilio Sanchez #21 6-3 6-7 7-6 Jakob Hlasek #27 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jakob Hlasek #583 #7 1,308 2,062 389 300 56.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Emilio Sanchez #1,301 #7 1,634 2,038 402 272 59.6% 0 1 0 0 14 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jakob Hlasek Emilio Sanchez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1982 1–2 33.3% 1,516 0 0
18 1983 5–6 45.5% #227 1,567 0 0
19 1984 16–19 45.7% #91 1,647 0 0 1984 9–12 42.9% #111 1,545 0 0
20 1985 29–23 55.8% #33 1,784 0 0 1985 16–14 53.3% #64 1,668 0 0
21 1986 35–25 58.3% #32 1,732 0 0 1986 52–23 69.3% #16 1,841 0 3
22 1987 32–21 60.4% #23 1,856 0 0 1987 56–23 70.9% #17 1,870 0 7
23 1988 44–14 75.9% #8 2,050 0 2 1988 39–19 67.2% #17 1,907 0 8
24 1989 23–18 56.1% #30 1,795 0 3 1989 37–16 69.8% #19 1,871 0 9
25 1990 41–22 65.1% #17 1,937 0 4 1990 48–24 66.7% #8 1,812 0 11
26 1991 45–25 64.3% #20 1,869 0 5 1991 40–22 64.5% #14 1,823 0 14
27 1992 24–22 52.2% #36 1,806 0 5 1992 40–25 61.5% #21 1,783 0 15
28 1993 20–25 44.4% #71 1,713 0 5 1993 28–26 51.9% #41 1,686 0 15
29 1994 22–24 47.8% #70 1,676 0 5 1994 17–26 39.5% #74 1,628 0 15
30 1995 32–27 54.2% #35 1,783 0 5 1995 13–22 37.1% #108 1,587 0 15
31 1996 20–27 42.6% #74 1,751 0 5 1996 7–16 30.4% #173 1,505 0 15
32 1997 0–4 0.0% #1056 1,467 0 15