H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

James Blake vs Jiri Vanek H2H: 2-0

James Blake holds a 2–0 lead over Jiri Vanek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, James Blake leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, James Blake won the 2003 Memphis round of 32 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

James Blake
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Jiri Vanek
CZE Age 48 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
James Blake #23 6-3 6-0 Jiri Vanek #192 Match data Feb 20, 2003* R32 Memphis ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
James Blake #28 7-6(2) 6-4 6-4 Jiri Vanek #219 Match data Jan 15, 2003* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
James Blake #1,020 #4 3,550 2,041 349 237 59.6% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Jiri Vanek #1,543 #74 796 1,646 68 122 35.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age James Blake Jiri Vanek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1995 1–1 50.0% #495 1,506 0 0
18 1998 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1999 1–4 20.0% #219 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2000 0–4 0.0% #212 1,453 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2001 11–9 55.0% #73 1,647 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2002 34–22 60.7% #28 1,815 0 1 2000 12–13 48.0% #77 1,591 0 0
23 2003 30–23 56.6% #37 1,794 0 1 2001 11–22 33.3% #102 1,534 0 0
24 2004 15–13 53.6% #97 1,692 0 1 2002 2–4 33.3% #199 1,532 0 0
25 2005 34–20 63.0% #23 1,924 0 3 2003 7–9 43.8% #143 1,545 0 0
26 2006 57–21 73.1% #4 1,999 0 8 2004 4–7 36.4% #115 1,533 0 0
27 2007 49–21 70.0% #13 1,916 0 10 2005 7–18 28.0% #99 1,500 0 0
28 2008 44–22 66.7% #10 1,883 0 10 2006 10–17 37.0% #102 1,552 0 0
29 2009 23–18 56.1% #44 1,849 0 10 2007 7–13 35.0% #101 1,578 0 0
30 2010 15–17 46.9% #135 1,759 0 10 2008 7–16 30.4% #124 1,563 0 0
31 2011 19–16 54.3% #59 1,824 0 10 2009 0–2 0.0% #175 1,577 0 0
32 2012 8–12 40.0% #127 1,781 0 10 — — — — — — —
33 2013 9–14 39.1% #153 1,711 0 10 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age James Blake Jiri Vanek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2000 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2001 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2002 21 12 33 63.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2003 24 14 38 63.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2001 3 9 12 25.0% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2004 12 9 21 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2002 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2005 28 13 41 68.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2003 3 5 8 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2006 46 14 60 76.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 1 1 2 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2007 40 15 55 72.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2005 1 3 4 25.0% 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2008 33 15 48 68.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2006 1 3 4 25.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2009 13 11 24 54.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2007 2 5 7 28.6% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2010 15 15 30 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2008 1 6 7 14.3% 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2011 18 14 32 56.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2012 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 273 164 437 62.5% 39 39 78 50.0% 32 27 59 54.2% 5 7 12 41.7% — 18 42 60 30.0% 48 66 114 42.1% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 7 8 12.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 563/586 of James Blake's and 180/190 of Jiri Vanek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age James Blake Jiri Vanek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 2/2 2.5 2.0 43.3% 49.4% 41.6% 39.2% 61.4% 44.6% 46.6%
18 1998 1/1 8.0 7.0 49.1% 60.4% 47.3% 66.7% 15.4% 53.7% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1999 5/5 3.6 4.4 54.3% 64.1% 45.3% 41.7% 36.7% 55.8% 31.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2000 4/4 3.3 3.0 48.4% 58.5% 30.3% 35.4% 54.5% 44.2% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2001 17/20 5.7 2.5 59.8% 71.7% 54.9% 64.8% 42.6% 64.8% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2002 50/56 4.5 2.5 58.7% 71.0% 51.7% 62.3% 44.2% 63.1% 39.2% 2000 22/25 6.0 3.5 55.1% 69.7% 47.3% 55.9% 43.2% 59.7% 36.5%
23 2003 52/53 5.2 3.0 60.2% 71.5% 51.7% 56.1% 48.8% 63.6% 40.7% 2001 29/33 5.4 2.2 54.5% 69.6% 45.8% 54.7% 42.3% 58.4% 36.3%
24 2004 28/28 4.8 2.4 60.2% 70.7% 51.0% 51.0% 36.6% 63.0% 39.1% 2002 5/6 5.4 1.6 56.8% 70.1% 51.4% 61.4% 54.2% 62.0% 33.9%
25 2005 54/54 6.6 2.4 58.6% 74.9% 53.7% 62.7% 41.6% 66.2% 39.7% 2003 16/16 7.2 2.5 56.4% 71.8% 48.8% 56.9% 51.0% 61.8% 35.2%
26 2006 77/78 6.1 2.7 57.5% 73.3% 53.3% 61.1% 44.9% 64.8% 41.9% 2004 11/11 5.5 3.0 57.3% 69.9% 43.5% 65.1% 34.7% 58.5% 36.3%
27 2007 67/70 7.4 2.9 57.8% 76.8% 54.8% 62.3% 47.5% 67.4% 39.1% 2005 25/25 7.3 3.4 60.4% 69.7% 42.7% 57.6% 34.8% 58.9% 33.4%
28 2008 59/66 7.0 2.6 55.7% 75.0% 52.5% 54.6% 46.8% 65.0% 39.6% 2006 27/27 4.4 3.2 65.9% 65.9% 42.1% 57.7% 46.3% 57.8% 37.9%
29 2009 41/41 6.3 3.0 57.3% 74.0% 53.5% 60.6% 41.0% 65.3% 35.1% 2007 20/20 5.8 2.7 61.0% 69.1% 44.6% 52.0% 44.1% 59.5% 33.2%
30 2010 32/32 5.2 2.8 57.4% 72.1% 52.4% 53.6% 37.7% 63.7% 36.3% 2008 21/23 6.0 3.2 58.6% 67.1% 43.2% 57.4% 44.1% 57.2% 33.6%
31 2011 33/35 5.5 3.8 57.7% 74.1% 47.4% 61.0% 46.0% 62.8% 35.5% 2009 2/2 4.0 6.5 52.9% 63.0% 36.1% 58.0% 25.0% 50.6% 18.6%
32 2012 20/20 5.4 3.1 56.9% 71.3% 49.4% 51.8% 46.5% 62.0% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 23/23 6.0 2.7 53.4% 75.6% 48.6% 58.9% 49.1% 62.6% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age James Blake Jiri Vanek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1506 98.4 -2.42 +0.35 0.841 45.6% — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 — — +0.19
18 1998 1492 98.2 +0.92 -1.01 0.743 44.6% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1999 1480 105.6 -2.20 -0.63 0.718 44.0% +30 — — 16.7% -2.42 1–0 0–1 — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2000 1453 104.3 -4.21 +0.21 0.692 41.4% +17 — — 0.0% -3.63 — 0–1 — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2001 1647 135.3 +2.25 +0.39 1.059 51.0% -18 — -87 55.1% +0.55 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2002 1816 147.9 +1.40 +2.12 1.061 51.1% -26 -178 -199 56.1% +0.32 11–10 (52%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.19 2000 1592 125.0 -1.75 -0.49 0.907 48.7% -27 +29 — 45.6% -0.15 5–5 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — +0.43
23 2003 1794 146.7 +1.54 +3.57 1.120 52.2% +27 -165 -202 58.3% +0.52 6–12 (33%) 15–9 (63%) — -0.97 2001 1534 129.4 -2.36 -1.10 0.873 47.5% -15 +85 — 39.0% -0.76 2–7 (22%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.01
24 2004 1692 126.8 -0.56 +1.37 1.056 50.9% +63 -67 — 55.1% +0.38 3–4 (43%) 7–3 (70%) — +2.11 2002 1533 112.7 +0.13 -0.05 0.893 48.7% -3 — — 40.0% -1.00 1–1 1–0 — +0.05
25 2005 1925 148.8 +3.11 +2.61 1.175 52.6% +27 -259 -338 61.2% +0.81 8–9 (47%) 10–15 (40%) — -1.49 2003 1546 123.4 -0.16 -1.98 0.920 48.6% -35 +88 — 44.7% -0.53 2–3 (40%) 7–2 (78%) — -0.28
26 2006 2000 158.3 +2.59 +5.15 1.189 53.1% +48 -316 -257 64.5% +0.91 17–8 (68%) 18–14 (56%) — +0.23 2004 1534 107.9 -1.90 -0.97 0.873 47.3% -3 +73 — 41.4% -0.90 3–4 (43%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.51
27 2007 1917 151.1 +3.35 +2.66 1.201 53.1% +45 -237 -153 66.3% +1.01 12–9 (57%) 20–16 (56%) — +3.66 2005 1501 112.6 -2.39 -3.28 0.814 46.3% -3 +44 — 30.2% -1.19 5–4 (56%) 4–12 (25%) — -0.01
28 2008 1883 152.4 +2.01 +2.91 1.131 52.4% +72 -189 -110 61.9% +0.79 13–11 (54%) 12–11 (52%) — +4.15 2006 1552 124.5 -2.92 -0.30 0.898 48.0% -20 +4 -48 41.5% -0.51 1–6 (14%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.18
29 2009 1850 151.0 +2.02 +0.45 1.012 50.5% +25 -106 -16 53.8% +0.24 7–8 (47%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.82 2007 1578 121.4 -2.67 -1.97 0.819 46.9% -83 +67 — 36.2% -1.04 3–4 (43%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.50
30 2010 1760 142.1 -0.13 0.00 1.000 50.0% +24 — — 49.4% -0.01 6–9 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.97 2008 1564 117.1 -3.67 -2.26 0.786 46.0% -66 +59 — 35.9% -1.23 4–5 (44%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.23
31 2011 1825 150.5 -0.14 -0.22 0.954 49.7% +33 — — 50.0% -0.01 6–5 (55%) 7–8 (47%) — -0.57 2009 1577 111.7 -3.01 +0.23 0.377 37.8% — — — 0.0% -3.60 — — — -0.30
32 2012 1781 139.4 -0.94 -0.30 0.965 49.4% +57 — — 45.5% -0.34 2–6 (25%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.24 2010 1548 99.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 1712 137.4 -1.34 +1.25 1.009 50.5% +56 — -13 42.1% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 3–8 (27%) — +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2042 153.8 +1.56 +2.23 1.088 51.6% +35 -188 -160 57.2% +0.48 97–99 (49%) 127–119 (52%) 97.2 +1.00 — 1647 125.9 -2.28 -1.45 0.854 47.3% -30 +52 -48 38.7% -0.82 27–39 (41%) 41–42 (49%) 100.0 +0.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.