H2H data updated: 2026-08-15 02:40 UTC

James Blake vs Thiemo de Bakker H2H: 1-0

James Blake holds a 1–0 lead over Thiemo de Bakker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, James Blake leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, James Blake won the 2013 Wimbledon first round 6-1 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

James Blake
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Thiemo de Bakker
NED Age 37 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

WinnerScoreLoserMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
James Blake #87 6-1 6-3 6-2 Thiemo de Bakker #93 Match data Jun 26, 2013* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
James Blake #1,020 #4 3,550 2,041 349 237 59.6% 0 0 0 0 10 10
Thiemo de Bakker #1,382 #40 1,010 1,853 54 80 40.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age James Blake Thiemo de Bakker
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2006 1–1 50.0% #464 1,512 0 0
18 1998 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 2007 1–4 20.0% #444 1,502 0 0
19 1999 1–4 20.0% #219 1,479 0 0 2008 1–1 50.0% #249 1,531 0 0
20 2000 0–4 0.0% #212 1,453 0 0 2009 2–3 40.0% #96 1,612 0 0
21 2001 11–9 55.0% #73 1,647 0 0 2010 26–23 53.1% #43 1,763 0 0
22 2002 34–22 60.7% #28 1,815 0 1 2011 2–11 15.4% #223 1,665 0 0
23 2003 30–23 56.6% #37 1,794 0 1 2012 0–2 0.0% #124 1,642 0 0
24 2004 15–13 53.6% #97 1,692 0 1 2013 7–10 41.2% #146 1,682 0 0
25 2005 34–20 63.0% #23 1,924 0 3 2014 7–6 53.8% #144 1,666 0 0
26 2006 57–21 73.1% #4 1,999 0 8 2015 2–5 28.6% #99 1,617 0 0
27 2007 49–21 70.0% #13 1,916 0 10 2016 5–12 29.4% #257 1,581 0 0
28 2008 44–22 66.7% #10 1,883 0 10 — — — — — — —
29 2009 23–18 56.1% #44 1,849 0 10 2018 0–1 0.0% #242 1,557 0 0
30 2010 15–17 46.9% #135 1,759 0 10 2019 0–1 0.0% #511 1,535 0 0
31 2011 19–16 54.3% #59 1,824 0 10 — — — — — — —
32 2012 8–12 40.0% #127 1,781 0 10 — — — — — — —
33 2013 9–14 39.1% #153 1,711 0 10 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age James Blake Thiemo de Bakker
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2008 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2000 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 2001 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2010 16 16 32 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
22 2002 21 12 33 63.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2011 1 6 7 14.3% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
23 2003 24 14 38 63.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2004 12 9 21 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2013 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
25 2005 28 13 41 68.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2014 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2006 46 14 60 76.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2007 40 15 55 72.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2016 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
28 2008 33 15 48 68.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2009 13 11 24 54.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2018 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2010 15 15 30 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2019 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2011 18 14 32 56.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2012 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 273 164 437 62.5% 39 39 78 50.0% 32 27 59 54.2% 5 7 12 41.7% — 27 45 72 37.5% 20 24 44 45.5% 7 11 18 38.9% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 563/586 of James Blake's and 133/134 of Thiemo de Bakker's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age James Blake Thiemo de Bakker
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 2/2 3.5 3.0 54.6% 74.1% 49.1% 72.9% 41.7% 62.8% 39.2%
18 1998 1/1 8.0 7.0 49.1% 60.4% 47.3% 66.7% 15.4% 53.7% 34.4% 2007 5/5 8.2 1.2 65.7% 71.8% 58.9% 57.1% 49.6% 67.3% 25.6%
19 1999 5/5 3.6 4.4 54.3% 64.1% 45.3% 41.7% 36.7% 55.8% 31.8% 2008 2/2 7.5 1.0 55.0% 73.1% 56.3% 68.6% 31.3% 66.0% 34.0%
20 2000 4/4 3.3 3.0 48.4% 58.5% 30.3% 35.4% 54.5% 44.2% 38.6% 2009 5/5 5.8 1.4 62.2% 70.1% 51.0% 61.2% 36.1% 62.1% 36.0%
21 2001 17/20 5.7 2.5 59.8% 71.7% 54.9% 64.8% 42.6% 64.8% 37.2% 2010 49/49 9.8 1.6 61.0% 73.7% 53.5% 60.8% 41.7% 65.8% 35.9%
22 2002 50/56 4.5 2.5 58.7% 71.0% 51.7% 62.3% 44.2% 63.1% 39.2% 2011 13/13 6.5 2.8 54.5% 68.0% 48.7% 53.9% 21.4% 59.2% 28.0%
23 2003 52/53 5.2 3.0 60.2% 71.5% 51.7% 56.1% 48.8% 63.6% 40.7% 2012 2/2 5.0 1.0 55.3% 60.2% 42.0% 48.5% 100.0% 52.1% 28.9%
24 2004 28/28 4.8 2.4 60.2% 70.7% 51.0% 51.0% 36.6% 63.0% 39.1% 2013 17/17 6.2 2.0 60.6% 69.6% 45.6% 62.0% 41.5% 60.2% 34.7%
25 2005 54/54 6.6 2.4 58.6% 74.9% 53.7% 62.7% 41.6% 66.2% 39.7% 2014 12/13 8.7 2.2 57.1% 77.0% 47.1% 64.2% 26.3% 64.1% 33.6%
26 2006 77/78 6.1 2.7 57.5% 73.3% 53.3% 61.1% 44.9% 64.8% 41.9% 2015 7/7 9.0 2.0 54.3% 74.6% 49.2% 59.1% 37.8% 63.0% 34.9%
27 2007 67/70 7.4 2.9 57.8% 76.8% 54.8% 62.3% 47.5% 67.4% 39.1% 2016 17/17 7.2 1.5 60.3% 70.5% 47.1% 49.0% 36.1% 61.3% 33.8%
28 2008 59/66 7.0 2.6 55.7% 75.0% 52.5% 54.6% 46.8% 65.0% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2009 41/41 6.3 3.0 57.3% 74.0% 53.5% 60.6% 41.0% 65.3% 35.1% 2018 1/1 4.0 3.0 71.7% 60.6% 15.4% 33.3% — 47.8% 15.8%
30 2010 32/32 5.2 2.8 57.4% 72.1% 52.4% 53.6% 37.7% 63.7% 36.3% 2019 1/1 9.0 4.0 58.2% 68.8% 17.4% 69.2% — 47.3% 21.4%
31 2011 33/35 5.5 3.8 57.7% 74.1% 47.4% 61.0% 46.0% 62.8% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2012 20/20 5.4 3.1 56.9% 71.3% 49.4% 51.8% 46.5% 62.0% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 23/23 6.0 2.7 53.4% 75.6% 48.6% 58.9% 49.1% 62.6% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 563/586 6.0 2.8 57.7% 73.3% 52.1% 58.7% 44.5% 64.3% 38.8% — 133/134 8.1 1.8 59.5% 72.0% 49.7% 58.8% 37.6% 63.0% 33.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age James Blake Thiemo de Bakker
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1513 104.7 -0.21 +0.15 1.055 51.5% — — — 60.0% +0.20 0–1 — -0.06
18 1998 1492 98.2 +0.92 -1.01 0.743 44.6% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 -0.01 2007 1502 115.2 -0.81 -3.06 0.782 47.1% — — — 35.7% -0.79 0–2 4–3 (57%) -0.11
19 1999 1480 105.6 -2.20 -0.63 0.718 44.0% +30 — — 16.7% -2.42 1–0 0–1 -0.11 2008 1532 107.0 -0.17 -0.92 1.000 50.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 0–1 +0.10
20 2000 1453 104.3 -4.21 +0.21 0.692 41.4% +17 — — 0.0% -3.63 — 0–1 -0.19 2009 1612 119.7 +1.05 -2.08 0.949 49.0% — — — 41.7% -0.58 1–1 2–2 (50%) -0.14
21 2001 1647 135.3 +2.25 +0.39 1.059 51.0% -19 — -87 55.1% +0.55 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) -0.05 2010 1764 149.9 +1.79 +0.33 1.050 50.7% -70 +14 -122 50.8% +0.25 7–5 (58%) 11–16 (41%) +0.66
22 2002 1816 147.9 +1.40 +2.12 1.061 51.1% -26 -178 -199 56.1% +0.32 11–10 (52%) 9–7 (56%) -0.56 2011 1665 125.5 -1.60 -4.74 0.686 44.4% -43 +82 — 27.0% -1.97 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) -0.53
23 2003 1794 146.7 +1.54 +3.57 1.120 52.2% +27 -165 -202 58.3% +0.52 6–12 (33%) 15–9 (63%) -0.85 2012 1642 103.3 -3.01 -3.23 0.604 41.7% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — 0–1 -0.03
24 2004 1692 126.8 -0.56 +1.37 1.056 50.9% +63 -67 — 55.1% +0.38 3–4 (43%) 7–3 (70%) +2.19 2013 1683 129.6 -1.44 -1.43 0.871 47.6% -44 +79 -77 37.8% -0.81 2–1 (67%) 3–2 (60%) -0.69
25 2005 1925 148.8 +3.11 +2.61 1.175 52.6% +27 -259 -338 61.2% +0.81 8–9 (47%) 10–15 (40%) -1.12 2014 1666 127.0 +0.18 -1.19 0.935 48.9% +10 — — 48.1% -0.19 2–1 (67%) 4–2 (67%) +0.48
26 2006 2000 158.3 +2.59 +5.15 1.189 53.1% +48 -316 -257 64.5% +0.91 17–8 (68%) 18–14 (56%) +0.58 2015 1618 116.8 +1.14 -1.79 0.944 49.0% — +112 — 41.2% -0.17 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) +0.19
27 2007 1917 151.1 +3.35 +2.66 1.201 53.1% +45 -237 -153 66.3% +1.01 12–9 (57%) 20–16 (56%) +3.92 2016 1582 124.6 -1.66 -1.23 0.874 47.5% +82 +72 — 34.9% -1.05 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) -0.68
28 2008 1883 152.4 +2.01 +2.91 1.131 52.4% +72 -189 -110 61.9% +0.79 13–11 (54%) 12–11 (52%) +4.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2009 1850 151.0 +2.02 +0.45 1.012 50.5% +25 -106 -16 53.8% +0.24 7–8 (47%) 14–11 (56%) -0.73 2018 1558 101.5 -1.76 -3.04 0.303 33.3% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — +0.06
30 2010 1760 142.1 -0.13 0.00 1.000 50.0% +24 — — 49.4% -0.01 6–9 (40%) 5–6 (45%) -0.86 2019 1536 99.9 +0.16 -1.51 0.406 36.1% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — -0.01
31 2011 1825 150.5 -0.14 -0.22 0.954 49.7% +33 — — 50.0% -0.01 6–5 (55%) 7–8 (47%) -0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2012 1781 139.4 -0.94 -0.30 0.965 49.4% +57 — — 45.5% -0.34 2–6 (25%) 4–5 (44%) +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 1712 137.4 -1.35 +1.26 1.009 50.5% +56 — -14 42.1% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 3–8 (27%) +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2042 153.8 +1.56 +2.23 1.088 51.6% +35 -188 -160 57.2% +0.48 97–99 (49%) 127–119 (52%) +1.16 — 1854 134.5 +0.13 -1.17 0.910 48.5% -29 +63 -104 41.6% -0.54 18–21 (46%) 33–36 (48%) -0.57

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.