H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

James Blake vs Tobias Kamke H2H: 0-1

Tobias Kamke holds a 1–0 lead over James Blake in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tobias Kamke leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tobias Kamke won the 2012 Los Angeles Open round of 32 6-2 5-7 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

James Blake
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Tobias Kamke
GER Age 40 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tobias Kamke #108 6-2 5-7 7-6(4) James Blake #112 Match data Jul 26, 2012* R32 Los Angeles Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
James Blake #1,020 #4 3,550 2,041 349 237 59.6% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Tobias Kamke #1,114 #64 744 1,766 62 101 38.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age James Blake Tobias Kamke
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1998 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1999 1–4 20.0% #219 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2000 0–4 0.0% #212 1,453 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2001 11–9 55.0% #73 1,647 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #210 1,502 0 0
22 2002 34–22 60.7% #28 1,815 0 1 2008 0–1 0.0% #243 1,508 0 0
23 2003 30–23 56.6% #37 1,794 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 2004 15–13 53.6% #97 1,692 0 1 2010 7–8 46.7% #67 1,639 0 0
25 2005 34–20 63.0% #23 1,924 0 3 2011 15–23 39.5% #96 1,738 0 0
26 2006 57–21 73.1% #4 1,999 0 8 2012 6–18 25.0% #98 1,628 0 0
27 2007 49–21 70.0% #13 1,916 0 10 2013 17–21 44.7% #74 1,731 0 0
28 2008 44–22 66.7% #10 1,883 0 10 2014 9–16 36.0% #97 1,669 0 0
29 2009 23–18 56.1% #44 1,849 0 10 2015 1–5 16.7% #277 1,583 0 0
30 2010 15–17 46.9% #135 1,759 0 10 2016 5–5 50.0% #118 1,707 0 0
31 2011 19–16 54.3% #59 1,824 0 10 2017 2–2 50.0% #233 1,617 0 0
32 2012 8–12 40.0% #127 1,781 0 10 — — — — — — —
33 2013 9–14 39.1% #153 1,711 0 10 2019 0–1 0.0% #242 1,566 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age James Blake Tobias Kamke
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2000 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2001 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2002 21 12 33 63.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2008 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2003 24 14 38 63.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2004 12 9 21 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2010 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 2005 28 13 41 68.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2011 7 14 21 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — —
26 2006 46 14 60 76.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2012 5 11 16 31.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2007 40 15 55 72.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2013 10 11 21 47.6% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2008 33 15 48 68.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2014 4 10 14 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2009 13 11 24 54.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2015 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2010 15 15 30 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2016 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2011 18 14 32 56.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
32 2012 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 273 164 437 62.5% 39 39 78 50.0% 32 27 59 54.2% 5 7 12 41.7% — 35 61 96 36.5% 16 27 43 37.2% 11 13 24 45.8% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 563/586 of James Blake's and 163/163 of Tobias Kamke's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age James Blake Tobias Kamke
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1998 1/1 8.0 7.0 49.1% 60.4% 47.3% 66.7% 15.4% 53.7% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1999 5/5 3.6 4.4 54.3% 64.1% 45.3% 41.7% 36.7% 55.8% 31.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2000 4/4 3.3 3.0 48.4% 58.5% 30.3% 35.4% 54.5% 44.2% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2001 17/20 5.7 2.5 59.8% 71.7% 54.9% 64.8% 42.6% 64.8% 37.2% 2007 1/1 0.0 6.0 47.2% 56.0% 35.7% 16.7% — 45.3% 17.6%
22 2002 50/56 4.5 2.5 58.7% 71.0% 51.7% 62.3% 44.2% 63.1% 39.2% 2008 1/1 3.0 11.0 58.3% 64.9% 45.3% 25.0% 33.3% 56.7% 30.1%
23 2003 52/53 5.2 3.0 60.2% 71.5% 51.7% 56.1% 48.8% 63.6% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2004 28/28 4.8 2.4 60.2% 70.7% 51.0% 51.0% 36.6% 63.0% 39.1% 2010 15/15 1.8 3.3 59.0% 65.8% 48.0% 56.5% 35.6% 58.8% 39.1%
25 2005 54/54 6.6 2.4 58.6% 74.9% 53.7% 62.7% 41.6% 66.2% 39.7% 2011 38/38 2.3 3.5 57.2% 65.9% 50.9% 55.5% 39.3% 59.5% 38.5%
26 2006 77/78 6.1 2.7 57.5% 73.3% 53.3% 61.1% 44.9% 64.8% 41.9% 2012 24/24 1.4 4.6 57.4% 61.6% 45.8% 47.2% 39.2% 54.8% 40.4%
27 2007 67/70 7.4 2.9 57.8% 76.8% 54.8% 62.3% 47.5% 67.4% 39.1% 2013 38/38 2.2 2.6 60.4% 66.9% 49.5% 60.7% 46.9% 60.0% 39.2%
28 2008 59/66 7.0 2.6 55.7% 75.0% 52.5% 54.6% 46.8% 65.0% 39.6% 2014 25/25 2.4 3.3 61.0% 66.2% 51.7% 60.8% 36.4% 60.4% 34.6%
29 2009 41/41 6.3 3.0 57.3% 74.0% 53.5% 60.6% 41.0% 65.3% 35.1% 2015 6/6 2.2 2.5 56.5% 61.9% 46.0% 38.6% 45.4% 54.5% 37.5%
30 2010 32/32 5.2 2.8 57.4% 72.1% 52.4% 53.6% 37.7% 63.7% 36.3% 2016 10/10 1.0 3.1 61.2% 64.4% 50.3% 45.7% 44.5% 58.8% 39.3%
31 2011 33/35 5.5 3.8 57.7% 74.1% 47.4% 61.0% 46.0% 62.8% 35.5% 2017 4/4 2.3 3.5 57.0% 73.4% 51.3% 60.9% 58.5% 64.2% 39.7%
32 2012 20/20 5.4 3.1 56.9% 71.3% 49.4% 51.8% 46.5% 62.0% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 23/23 6.0 2.7 53.4% 75.6% 48.6% 58.9% 49.1% 62.6% 37.7% 2019 1/1 0.0 8.0 46.4% 66.7% 44.1% 60.0% 33.3% 54.5% 29.6%
Career — 563/586 6.0 2.8 57.7% 73.3% 52.1% 58.7% 44.5% 64.3% 38.8% — 163/163 2.0 3.4 58.8% 65.4% 49.3% 54.9% 41.0% 58.7% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age James Blake Tobias Kamke
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1998 1492 98.2 +0.92 -1.01 0.743 44.6% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1999 1480 105.6 -2.20 -0.63 0.718 44.0% +30 — — 16.7% -2.42 1–0 0–1 — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2000 1453 104.3 -4.21 +0.21 0.692 41.4% +17 — — 0.0% -3.63 — 0–1 — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2001 1647 135.3 +2.25 +0.39 1.059 51.0% -18 — -87 55.1% +0.55 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 101.7 +0.08 2007 1502 102.7 +1.52 -1.81 0.323 34.5% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.07
22 2002 1816 147.9 +1.40 +2.12 1.061 51.1% -26 -178 -199 56.1% +0.32 11–10 (52%) 9–7 (56%) 104.0 -0.19 2008 1509 105.8 +1.11 -1.95 0.695 44.2% — — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.07
23 2003 1794 146.7 +1.54 +3.57 1.120 52.2% +27 -165 -202 58.3% +0.52 6–12 (33%) 15–9 (63%) 98.1 -0.97 2009 1457 96.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2004 1692 126.8 -0.56 +1.37 1.056 50.9% +63 -67 — 55.1% +0.38 3–4 (43%) 7–3 (70%) 101.0 +2.11 2010 1639 126.8 -1.68 +1.56 0.949 48.8% -130 -61 +94 46.3% -0.29 1–1 0–1 — -0.29
25 2005 1925 148.8 +3.11 +2.61 1.175 52.6% +27 -259 -338 61.2% +0.81 8–9 (47%) 10–15 (40%) 98.1 -1.49 2011 1738 134.7 -2.56 +1.09 0.951 49.1% -78 -127 +18 42.4% -0.27 1–8 (11%) 3–9 (25%) 89.6 +0.04
26 2006 2000 158.3 +2.59 +5.15 1.189 53.1% +48 -316 -257 64.5% +0.91 17–8 (68%) 18–14 (56%) 104.4 +0.23 2012 1629 130.3 -5.44 +2.38 0.893 47.6% -3 -69 — 33.9% -1.11 1–6 (14%) 1–4 (20%) 91.7 -0.37
27 2007 1917 151.1 +3.35 +2.66 1.201 53.1% +45 -237 -153 66.3% +1.01 12–9 (57%) 20–16 (56%) 97.1 +3.66 2013 1731 143.6 -2.58 +2.05 0.978 50.0% +2 -95 -37 48.9% +0.08 4–6 (40%) 6–3 (67%) 102.2 -0.29
28 2008 1883 152.4 +2.01 +2.91 1.131 52.4% +72 -189 -110 61.9% +0.79 13–11 (54%) 12–11 (52%) 97.3 +4.15 2014 1669 132.2 -3.08 -1.17 0.873 48.0% -24 -5 +60 42.6% -0.69 3–7 (30%) 6–5 (55%) 99.9 +0.69
29 2009 1850 151.0 +2.02 +0.45 1.012 50.5% +25 -106 -16 53.8% +0.24 7–8 (47%) 14–11 (56%) 101.0 -0.82 2015 1583 117.3 -3.20 +0.43 0.825 46.0% -7 — — 25.0% -1.69 1–1 1–1 — -0.03
30 2010 1760 142.1 -0.13 0.00 1.000 50.0% +24 — — 49.4% -0.01 6–9 (40%) 5–6 (45%) 93.5 -0.97 2016 1707 126.4 -2.95 +1.32 0.953 49.2% -8 — — 47.8% -0.17 1–0 3–3 (50%) — +0.76
31 2011 1825 150.5 -0.14 -0.22 0.954 49.7% +33 — — 50.0% -0.01 6–5 (55%) 7–8 (47%) 99.3 -0.57 2017 1618 113.4 +0.68 +0.45 1.108 51.9% — — +97 55.6% +0.33 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.10
32 2012 1781 139.4 -0.94 -0.30 0.965 49.4% +57 — — 45.5% -0.34 2–6 (25%) 4–5 (44%) 94.5 +0.24 2018 1543 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 1712 137.4 -1.34 +1.25 1.009 50.5% +56 — -13 42.1% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 +0.69 2019 1567 110.3 -0.77 -0.97 0.651 42.8% — — — 25.0% -2.25 — — — -0.04
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1532 92.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1492 104.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1515 104.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2042 153.8 +1.56 +2.23 1.088 51.6% +35 -188 -160 57.2% +0.48 97–99 (49%) 127–119 (52%) 97.2 +1.00 — 1766 131.0 -2.90 +1.13 0.926 48.7% -32 -76 +38 42.4% -0.48 12–30 (29%) 21–28 (43%) 91.3 +0.26

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.