H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

James Duckworth vs Daniel Brands

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for James Duckworth vs Daniel Brands.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

James Duckworth
Australia Age 34 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Daniel Brands
GER Age 39 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Brands #105 6-4 7-6(1) James Duckworth #168 Match data May 27, 2012 Q1 Q Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
James Duckworth #71 #46 1,244 1,801 85 133 39.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daniel Brands #1,055 #51 896 1,886 58 93 38.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age James Duckworth Daniel Brands
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2007 1–1 50.0% #220 1,491 0 0
20 2012 2–3 40.0% #209 1,497 0 0 2008 1–4 20.0% #150 1,539 0 0
21 2013 3–7 30.0% #136 1,567 0 0 2009 7–5 58.3% #92 1,645 0 0
22 2014 1–7 12.5% #127 1,594 0 0 2010 9–19 32.1% #104 1,670 0 0
23 2015 9–11 45.0% #120 1,626 0 0 2011 4–11 26.7% #110 1,690 0 0
24 2016 4–8 33.3% #103 1,703 0 0 2012 5–8 38.5% #153 1,688 0 0
25 2017 0–1 0.0% #990 1,685 0 0 2013 23–23 50.0% #54 1,809 0 0
26 2018 2–6 25.0% #234 1,610 0 0 2014 2–11 15.4% #329 1,713 0 0
27 2019 0–3 0.0% #100 1,575 0 0 2015 2–1 66.7% #159 1,729 0 0
28 2020 4–8 33.3% #103 1,578 0 0 2016 2–4 33.3% #168 1,660 0 0
29 2021 22–19 53.7% #49 1,791 0 0 2017 1–4 20.0% #320 1,664 0 0
30 2022 7–13 35.0% #155 1,689 0 0 2018 0–1 0.0% #182 1,616 0 0
31 2023 2–5 28.6% #116 1,598 0 0 2019 1–1 50.0% #465 1,605 0 0
32 2024 9–15 37.5% #82 1,636 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2025 8–12 40.0% #87 1,661 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2026 12–15 44.4% #71 1,719 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age James Duckworth Daniel Brands
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2012 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
21 2013 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2014 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2010 4 12 16 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
23 2015 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2011 4 5 9 44.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2016 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 2 4 6 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
25 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 11 12 23 47.8% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 2018 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2014 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2019 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
28 2020 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2021 18 15 33 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2017 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2022 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2018 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2023 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2019 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2024 5 11 16 31.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2025 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 9 11 20 45.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 66 96 162 40.7% 5 14 19 26.3% 14 23 37 37.8% — 30 49 79 38.0% 21 34 55 38.2% 7 10 17 41.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 215/219 of James Duckworth's and 151/151 of Daniel Brands's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age James Duckworth Daniel Brands
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 7.5 2.0 64.3% 87.8% 59.9% 100.0% 16.7% 77.8% 23.5%
20 2012 5/5 7.2 3.0 57.7% 71.8% 47.6% 56.3% 54.3% 60.9% 35.7% 2008 5/5 8.0 4.4 61.7% 75.9% 40.5% 48.6% 34.2% 63.2% 30.6%
21 2013 10/10 13.5 3.8 58.0% 73.0% 51.9% 64.5% 46.3% 63.9% 32.7% 2009 12/12 8.3 3.3 67.9% 76.6% 51.4% 69.8% 37.8% 68.6% 34.8%
22 2014 8/8 9.3 2.8 60.7% 72.3% 48.5% 63.2% 41.4% 62.5% 27.5% 2010 28/28 9.3 3.0 64.5% 69.9% 53.9% 57.0% 31.5% 63.9% 29.5%
23 2015 20/20 9.8 4.3 57.3% 71.2% 51.6% 61.0% 35.1% 62.7% 32.4% 2011 15/15 7.0 3.0 68.7% 68.6% 47.4% 57.3% 31.0% 61.7% 28.0%
24 2016 12/12 10.7 3.8 52.6% 73.3% 52.5% 70.3% 40.3% 63.5% 34.2% 2012 13/13 11.1 3.8 63.0% 76.4% 48.5% 49.4% 35.6% 66.2% 31.8%
25 2017 1/1 8.0 7.0 50.0% 78.9% 49.3% 42.9% 22.2% 64.1% 33.3% 2013 46/46 8.5 2.2 66.8% 72.9% 53.0% 57.6% 35.3% 66.2% 33.4%
26 2018 8/8 8.6 4.3 51.8% 73.9% 46.2% 51.6% 52.0% 60.2% 30.9% 2014 13/13 9.2 1.8 69.7% 68.9% 50.3% 62.1% 22.8% 62.9% 29.5%
27 2019 3/3 8.7 5.0 59.0% 68.9% 43.0% 47.2% 62.2% 58.3% 32.4% 2015 3/3 7.3 3.3 54.4% 75.4% 62.8% 43.8% 27.8% 71.2% 37.0%
28 2020 12/12 7.4 3.5 56.5% 70.3% 51.4% 64.9% 36.5% 61.9% 28.4% 2016 6/6 12.3 5.0 64.1% 72.7% 51.2% 59.5% 53.3% 64.7% 32.0%
29 2021 39/41 7.2 1.8 57.4% 73.2% 53.9% 64.6% 49.3% 64.7% 36.0% 2017 5/5 7.0 5.2 64.9% 70.4% 41.0% 62.4% 23.2% 59.4% 29.4%
30 2022 20/20 7.8 2.6 54.4% 72.5% 52.4% 51.3% 50.5% 63.2% 32.5% 2018 1/1 13.0 4.0 71.7% 70.4% 64.3% 66.7% 0.0% 68.7% 28.6%
31 2023 7/7 6.9 2.7 56.8% 68.8% 54.9% 60.9% 25.3% 62.9% 34.9% 2019 2/2 8.0 3.0 66.9% 67.0% 55.3% 66.7% 43.8% 63.0% 35.5%
32 2024 24/24 7.6 2.4 60.5% 73.8% 54.4% 63.7% 35.6% 66.1% 30.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2025 20/20 7.3 3.2 56.7% 73.3% 53.5% 63.3% 30.2% 64.8% 33.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 26/28 8.2 3.9 55.4% 74.2% 52.1% 67.6% 28.8% 64.0% 33.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 215/219 8.3 3.1 56.7% 72.8% 52.3% 62.3% 40.1% 63.7% 32.9% — 151/151 8.8 3.0 66.0% 72.3% 51.4% 58.5% 33.1% 65.1% 31.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age James Duckworth Daniel Brands
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2010 1475 94.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 1459 103.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1492 106.0 -2.82 -3.49 1.057 51.7% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.05
20 2012 1497 119.2 -0.75 -0.53 0.913 48.9% +40 — — 46.2% -0.46 — 0–1 — -0.13 2008 1540 111.5 -1.86 -1.37 0.830 46.7% — +37 — 25.0% -1.50 0–1 — — +0.09
21 2013 1567 119.2 +0.09 -1.67 0.906 48.8% -18 — — 42.9% -0.57 1–5 (17%) 3–1 (75%) — +1.12 2009 1645 119.5 +2.51 -1.77 1.108 51.4% — +44 — 53.3% +0.30 3–3 (50%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.22
22 2014 1594 125.2 -0.36 -1.26 0.732 45.5% -76 — +178 28.0% -1.72 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.71 2010 1671 129.6 +0.41 -4.53 0.817 46.9% -109 -45 +44 34.3% -1.14 3–4 (43%) 9–9 (50%) — -1.34
23 2015 1626 136.9 -0.93 -2.27 0.868 48.1% -5 -41 — 44.1% -0.51 5–5 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — +1.27 2011 1691 120.3 -1.58 -5.51 0.732 45.6% -31 -86 — 27.8% -1.61 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.41
24 2016 1704 136.2 -0.18 -0.59 0.937 49.5% +28 — — 35.5% -0.23 1–3 (25%) 1–6 (14%) — -0.30 2012 1689 117.4 +1.52 -2.94 0.940 48.7% +10 -50 — 45.5% -0.36 1–3 (25%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.51
25 2017 1685 103.8 -1.10 -1.52 0.928 48.8% — — — 25.0% -1.00 — 1–1 — +0.01 2013 1809 149.3 +2.79 -2.73 0.988 49.7% -11 +4 -192 47.8% -0.11 7–5 (58%) 9–9 (50%) — -2.24
26 2018 1611 118.6 -1.08 -1.76 0.777 46.3% +34 — — 27.3% -1.55 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.19 2014 1713 128.9 -0.97 -3.58 0.796 46.4% +3 — — 33.3% -1.28 0–6 (0%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.62
27 2019 1576 127.0 +1.83 +0.41 0.776 46.1% +37 — — 12.5% -1.75 0–1 — — -0.63 2015 1729 122.1 +0.44 +1.03 1.284 52.5% +26 — — 57.1% +0.14 1–0 1–0 — -0.11
28 2020 1578 119.3 -1.38 -4.27 0.744 46.1% +20 — — 35.5% -1.03 1–1 5–4 (56%) — +0.39 2016 1661 117.0 +0.34 -3.35 0.907 48.9% +50 — — 42.1% -0.32 0–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.06
29 2021 1792 142.4 +0.90 -0.46 1.020 50.4% -13 — -28 52.8% +0.10 6–6 (50%) 10–10 (50%) — +1.53 2017 1665 110.8 -1.31 -3.25 0.724 45.2% — — — 16.7% -1.42 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.08
30 2022 1689 127.7 -0.46 -2.35 0.884 48.4% +38 — +60 39.0% -0.51 5–5 (50%) 4–7 (36%) — +0.30 2018 1616 97.9 +1.38 +0.15 0.912 48.0% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — +0.04
31 2023 1598 108.9 -1.00 -0.94 0.940 49.1% +42 — — 36.8% -0.95 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.93 2019 1605 109.1 +0.20 -3.04 0.961 49.1% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–1 — -0.28
32 2024 1637 127.6 +0.43 -3.44 0.894 48.6% -34 — +160 43.1% -0.40 2–5 (29%) 9–6 (60%) — -0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2025 1661 119.9 +0.59 -1.25 0.960 49.4% -4 — +93 44.4% -0.39 2–6 (25%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 1719 131.3 +0.27 -1.76 0.937 49.3% -1 -241 -32 47.1% -0.13 3–4 (43%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1801 134.8 0.00 -1.73 0.907 48.7% +1 -127 +67 42.4% -0.47 29–48 (38%) 60–63 (49%) 96.2 +1.72 — 1886 131.0 +0.91 -3.27 0.900 48.3% -25 -9 -63 40.4% -0.64 18–26 (41%) 43–43 (50%) 98.0 -2.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.