H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
James Duckworth vs Daniel Brands
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for James Duckworth vs Daniel Brands.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 34
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
GER
Age 39
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Duckworth | #74 | #46 | 1,244 | 1,799 | 76 | 128 | 37.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daniel Brands | #1,055 | #51 | 896 | 1,886 | 57 | 92 | 38.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | James Duckworth | Daniel Brands | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #209 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #150 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #136 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #92 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #127 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #104 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #120 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #110 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #153 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #990 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #234 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #329 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #100 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #159 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #49 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #320 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #155 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #116 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #465 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2024 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #74 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |