H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jan Apell vs Nicklas Kulti H2H: 2-0
Jan Apell holds a 2–0 lead over Nicklas Kulti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jan Apell leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jan Apell won the 1996 St. Petersburg third round 4-6 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 56
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 1996* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jan Apell | 4-6 6-2 6-4 | Nicklas Kulti | Match data |
| Aug 25, 1994* | Schenectady | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jan Apell | 5-7 6-2 6-3 | Nicklas Kulti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Apell | #835 | #62 | 670 | 1,770 | 44 | 67 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nicklas Kulti | #977 | #32 | 826 | 1,819 | 150 | 179 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan Apell | Nicklas Kulti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #176 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #118 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #656 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #171 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #79 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1992 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #152 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #46 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1993 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #152 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #99 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1994 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #95 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,638 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1995 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #86 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,636 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1996 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #298 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #154 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #245 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #290 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #251 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #118 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #766 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,558 | 0 | 3 |