H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Jan Hernych vs Daniel Brands H2H: 1-0
Jan Hernych holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Brands in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan Hernych leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jan Hernych won the 2013 Halle third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 39
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2013* | Halle | ATP 500 | R32 | Grass | Jan Hernych | 6-4 6-2 | Daniel Brands | Match data |
| Oct 15, 2012 | Vienna | ATP 500 | Q1 | Hard | Daniel Brands | 6-4 6-2 | Jan Hernych | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Hernych | #1,606 | #59 | 1,157 | 1,780 | 79 | 115 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daniel Brands | #1,055 | #51 | 896 | 1,886 | 57 | 92 | 38.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan Hernych | Daniel Brands | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #150 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #92 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #104 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #110 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #153 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #74 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #329 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #156 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #159 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2009 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #113 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #320 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #168 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #465 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #193 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2013 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2015 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #424 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |