H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jan Hernych vs Kevin Kim H2H: 1-1
Jan Hernych and Kevin Kim are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jan Hernych won the 2006 US Open first round 6-1 6-4 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2006* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jan Hernych | 6-1 6-4 3-6 7-5 | Kevin Kim | Match data |
| Feb 10, 2005* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Kevin Kim | 7-5 6-3 | Jan Hernych | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2004* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Q2 | Grass | Jan Hernych | 6-0 6-0 | Kevin Kim | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Hernych | #1,606 | #59 | 1,157 | 1,780 | 79 | 115 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kevin Kim | #1,213 | #63 | 866 | 1,641 | 44 | 97 | 31.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan Hernych | Kevin Kim | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1300 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #141 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,392 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #238 | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #219 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #74 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #101 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #156 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #101 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #178 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2009 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #113 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #117 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #168 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #245 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #193 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2013 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2015 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #424 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |