H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Jan Hernych vs Tobias Kamke H2H: 1-0

Jan Hernych holds a 1–0 lead over Tobias Kamke in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan Hernych leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jan Hernych won the 2014 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 5-7 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jan Hernych
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Tobias Kamke
GER Age 40 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jan Hernych #285 6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 5-7 6-4 Tobias Kamke #87 Match data Jun 25, 2014* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Jan Hernych #134 6-3 7-6(4) 7-6(2) Tobias Kamke #195 Match data Jun 24, 2008* Q3 Q Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jan Hernych #1,606 #59 1,157 1,783 79 115 40.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tobias Kamke #1,114 #64 744 1,766 62 101 38.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jan Hernych Tobias Kamke
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2000 0–1 0.0% #272 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #210 1,502 0 0
22 2002 0–1 0.0% #214 1,475 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #243 1,508 0 0
24 2004 9–12 42.9% #83 1,571 0 0 2010 7–8 46.7% #67 1,639 0 0
25 2005 18–22 45.0% #74 1,622 0 0 2011 15–23 39.5% #96 1,738 0 0
26 2006 17–20 45.9% #75 1,666 0 0 2012 6–18 25.0% #98 1,628 0 0
27 2007 7–15 31.8% #156 1,612 0 0 2013 17–21 44.7% #74 1,731 0 0
28 2008 4–8 33.3% #81 1,675 0 0 2014 9–16 36.0% #97 1,669 0 0
29 2009 11–23 32.4% #113 1,667 0 0 2015 1–5 16.7% #277 1,583 0 0
30 2010 0–1 0.0% #241 1,598 0 0 2016 5–5 50.0% #118 1,707 0 0
31 2011 3–2 60.0% #168 1,664 0 0 2017 2–2 50.0% #233 1,617 0 0
32 2012 2–1 66.7% #193 1,605 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2013 5–5 50.0% #219 1,744 0 0 2019 0–1 0.0% #242 1,566 0 0
34 2014 1–1 50.0% #199 1,701 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2015 2–2 50.0% #286 1,696 0 0 — — — — — — —
36 2016 0–1 0.0% #424 1,641 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jan Hernych Tobias Kamke
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2002 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2004 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2010 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 2005 9 12 21 42.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2011 7 14 21 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — —
26 2006 6 9 15 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 2012 5 11 16 31.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2007 6 10 16 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2013 10 11 21 47.6% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2008 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2014 4 10 14 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2009 9 13 22 40.9% 2 7 9 22.2% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2015 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2011 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
32 2012 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2014 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 43 59 102 42.2% 13 28 41 31.7% 19 21 40 47.5% 4 7 11 36.4% — 35 61 96 36.5% 16 27 43 37.2% 11 13 24 45.8% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 190/194 of Jan Hernych's and 163/163 of Tobias Kamke's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jan Hernych Tobias Kamke
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2000 1/1 1.0 1.0 72.7% 55.0% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 49.1% 25.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 1/1 0.0 6.0 47.2% 56.0% 35.7% 16.7% — 45.3% 17.6%
22 2002 1/1 0.0 1.0 63.4% 38.5% 20.0% 40.0% 50.0% 31.7% 33.3% 2008 1/1 3.0 11.0 58.3% 64.9% 45.3% 25.0% 33.3% 56.7% 30.1%
24 2004 21/21 3.1 2.0 65.6% 66.1% 49.3% 55.9% 49.3% 60.3% 37.7% 2010 15/15 1.8 3.3 59.0% 65.8% 48.0% 56.5% 35.6% 58.8% 39.1%
25 2005 39/40 2.5 2.3 65.8% 64.8% 50.9% 59.0% 44.9% 60.0% 38.0% 2011 38/38 2.3 3.5 57.2% 65.9% 50.9% 55.5% 39.3% 59.5% 38.5%
26 2006 36/37 2.7 1.7 66.8% 64.4% 51.4% 55.2% 44.3% 60.0% 40.1% 2012 24/24 1.4 4.6 57.4% 61.6% 45.8% 47.2% 39.2% 54.8% 40.4%
27 2007 21/22 3.1 1.6 66.2% 64.5% 49.4% 54.9% 36.1% 59.1% 36.5% 2013 38/38 2.2 2.6 60.4% 66.9% 49.5% 60.7% 46.9% 60.0% 39.2%
28 2008 12/12 2.2 2.6 65.3% 59.8% 51.0% 45.2% 47.7% 56.8% 35.1% 2014 25/25 2.4 3.3 61.0% 66.2% 51.7% 60.8% 36.4% 60.4% 34.6%
29 2009 34/34 3.0 2.4 65.0% 66.1% 48.1% 59.0% 39.0% 59.7% 35.8% 2015 6/6 2.2 2.5 56.5% 61.9% 46.0% 38.6% 45.4% 54.5% 37.5%
30 2010 1/1 2.0 2.0 61.2% 58.7% 65.0% 33.3% 33.3% 61.2% 33.7% 2016 10/10 1.0 3.1 61.2% 64.4% 50.3% 45.7% 44.5% 58.8% 39.3%
31 2011 5/5 5.0 2.2 68.7% 64.0% 51.8% 77.2% 32.9% 60.3% 36.9% 2017 4/4 2.3 3.5 57.0% 73.4% 51.3% 60.9% 58.5% 64.2% 39.7%
32 2012 3/3 2.3 4.0 56.3% 58.6% 47.0% 64.9% 33.3% 53.2% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 10/10 4.3 3.2 61.1% 67.6% 51.5% 54.1% 34.9% 61.4% 34.9% 2019 1/1 0.0 8.0 46.4% 66.7% 44.1% 60.0% 33.3% 54.5% 29.6%
34 2014 2/2 12.0 1.5 69.2% 71.4% 45.7% 66.2% 35.0% 63.4% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 3/4 4.3 2.7 66.4% 60.1% 51.5% 63.1% 43.3% 57.2% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 1/1 6.0 2.0 62.9% 67.9% 36.4% 55.6% 40.0% 56.2% 34.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jan Hernych Tobias Kamke
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 2000 1486 98.6 -2.51 +0.58 0.491 38.4% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2001 1474 101.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1502 102.7 +1.52 -1.81 0.323 34.5% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.07
22 2002 1476 96.0 -0.28 -1.50 0.488 32.5% — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.02 2008 1509 105.8 +1.11 -1.95 0.695 44.2% — — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.07
23 2003 1461 99.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1457 96.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2004 1572 131.6 -2.45 +1.84 0.949 49.1% +5 — -15 40.4% -0.57 3–4 (43%) 2–4 (33%) 99.9 -0.25 2010 1639 126.8 -1.68 +1.56 0.949 48.8% -130 -61 +94 46.3% -0.29 1–1 0–1 — -0.29
25 2005 1623 129.5 -1.47 +0.65 0.949 49.0% -58 -65 +45 46.2% -0.34 5–7 (42%) 9–8 (53%) 101.9 -0.80 2011 1738 134.7 -2.56 +1.09 0.951 49.1% -78 -127 +18 42.4% -0.27 1–8 (11%) 3–9 (25%) 89.6 +0.04
26 2006 1667 130.1 -1.41 +2.15 1.001 50.0% -66 -121 +41 47.3% -0.29 3–7 (30%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -0.14 2012 1629 130.3 -5.44 +2.38 0.893 47.6% -3 -69 — 33.9% -1.11 1–6 (14%) 1–4 (20%) 91.7 -0.37
27 2007 1613 131.4 -1.99 +0.62 0.893 47.8% +23 -116 — 36.0% -1.02 1–4 (20%) 1–5 (17%) 94.0 -1.47 2013 1731 143.6 -2.58 +2.05 0.978 50.0% +2 -95 -37 48.9% +0.08 4–6 (40%) 6–3 (67%) 102.2 -0.29
28 2008 1676 117.5 -2.03 -0.68 0.813 46.8% +19 -154 — 37.5% -1.06 2–3 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 99.3 +0.14 2014 1669 132.2 -3.08 -1.17 0.873 48.0% -24 -5 +60 42.6% -0.69 3–7 (30%) 6–5 (55%) 99.9 +0.69
29 2009 1668 137.6 -2.02 -0.08 0.888 47.8% +35 -129 +32 35.6% -0.80 5–9 (36%) 2–6 (25%) 94.6 -1.77 2015 1583 117.3 -3.20 +0.43 0.825 46.0% -7 — — 25.0% -1.69 1–1 1–1 — -0.03
30 2010 1598 112.4 -0.83 +1.60 0.867 47.8% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — -0.05 2016 1707 126.4 -2.95 +1.32 0.953 49.2% -8 — — 47.8% -0.17 1–0 3–3 (50%) — +0.76
31 2011 1664 121.9 -0.09 +1.05 0.929 48.7% +47 — — 47.1% +0.06 2–0 1–4 (20%) — -0.39 2017 1618 113.4 +0.68 +0.45 1.108 51.9% — — +97 55.6% +0.33 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.10
32 2012 1606 112.1 -2.89 +0.24 0.845 46.8% — +54 — 50.0% -0.75 2–0 — — -0.23 2018 1543 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2013 1745 122.3 -0.81 -0.62 0.905 48.3% — — +148 45.8% -0.46 3–1 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 102.6 -0.30 2019 1567 110.3 -0.77 -0.97 0.651 42.8% — — — 25.0% -2.25 — — — -0.04
34 2014 1702 109.1 +1.00 -1.06 0.949 49.7% — — — 44.4% -0.33 1–0 0–1 — 0.00 2020 1532 92.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 1696 112.0 -2.26 -1.93 0.853 47.2% — — +192 50.0% -0.63 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.14 2021 1492 104.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 1641 101.2 +0.27 -3.38 0.789 45.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.02 2022 1515 104.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2018 1618 97.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1783 128.6 -1.68 +0.70 0.918 48.5% -12 -100 +78 41.9% -0.60 28–37 (43%) 32–37 (46%) 95.5 -2.56 — 1766 131.0 -2.90 +1.13 0.926 48.7% -32 -76 +38 42.4% -0.48 12–30 (29%) 21–28 (43%) 91.3 +0.26

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.