H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Jan Hernych vs Tobias Kamke H2H: 1-0
Jan Hernych holds a 1–0 lead over Tobias Kamke in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan Hernych leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jan Hernych won the 2014 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 5-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 40
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2014* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Jan Hernych | 6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 5-7 6-4 | Tobias Kamke | Match data |
| Jun 24, 2008* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Q3 | Grass | Jan Hernych | 6-3 7-6(4) 7-6(2) | Tobias Kamke | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Hernych | #1,606 | #59 | 1,157 | 1,780 | 79 | 115 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tobias Kamke | #1,114 | #64 | 744 | 1,764 | 60 | 99 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan Hernych | Tobias Kamke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #74 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #96 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #98 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #156 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #74 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #97 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2009 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #113 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #277 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2011 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #168 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #193 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2013 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2015 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #286 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #424 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |