H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Jan-Lennard Struff vs Dominic Thiem H2H: 1-3

Dominic Thiem holds a 3–1 lead over Jan-Lennard Struff in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Dominic Thiem leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Dominic Thiem won the 2018 St. Petersburg round of 16 7-6(4) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jan-Lennard Struff
Germany Age 36 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Dominic Thiem
AUT Age 33 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dominic Thiem #8 7-6(4) 6-4 Jan-Lennard Struff #50 Match data Sep 21, 2018* R16 St. Petersburg ATP 250 Hard
Dominic Thiem #8 4-6 6-4 6-4 6-3 Jan-Lennard Struff #58 Match data Jan 18, 2017* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Dominic Thiem #14 1-6 6-3 6-4 Jan-Lennard Struff #115 Match data Apr 12, 2016* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Jan-Lennard Struff #54 6-7(6) 6-4 6-3 Dominic Thiem #37 Match data Jan 14, 2015* R32 ASB Classic ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jan-Lennard Struff #44 #21 1,628 2,001 230 267 46.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Dominic Thiem #1,174 #3 9,125 2,240 337 207 61.9% 1 1 0 5 10 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jan-Lennard Struff Dominic Thiem
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2011 1–3 25.0% #638 1,495 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2012 1–2 33.3% #309 1,486 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2013 4–2 66.7% #139 1,580 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2014 22–23 48.9% #39 1,852 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2015 36–26 58.1% #20 1,891 0 3
22 — — — — — — — 2016 58–24 70.7% #8 2,005 0 7
23 2013 4–9 30.8% #107 1,585 0 0 2017 47–27 63.5% #5 1,958 0 8
24 2014 15–17 46.9% #59 1,721 0 0 2018 50–21 70.4% #8 2,066 0 11
25 2015 4–18 18.2% #107 1,625 0 0 2019 48–17 73.8% #4 2,143 0 16
26 2016 11–18 37.9% #63 1,784 0 0 2020 24–7 77.4% #3 2,201 1 17
27 2017 27–28 49.1% #53 1,856 0 0 2021 8–8 50.0% #15 2,014 1 17
28 2018 23–24 48.9% #57 1,856 0 0 2022 18–16 52.9% #102 1,907 1 17
29 2019 34–27 55.7% #35 1,883 0 0 2023 19–22 46.3% #98 1,799 1 17
30 2020 11–14 44.0% #36 1,821 0 0 2024 1–9 10.0% #524 1,628 1 17
31 2021 23–27 46.0% #51 1,765 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2022 3–10 23.1% #150 1,677 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2023 20–17 54.1% #25 1,806 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2024 28–21 57.1% #42 1,883 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2025 14–21 40.0% #83 1,822 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2026 13–16 44.8% #44 1,787 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jan-Lennard Struff Dominic Thiem
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 14 16 30 46.7% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 25 15 40 62.5% 25 7 32 78.1% 8 2 10 80.0%
23 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2017 21 19 40 52.5% 22 5 27 81.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2014 9 8 17 52.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2018 23 11 34 67.6% 26 8 34 76.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2015 4 8 12 33.3% 0 7 7 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2019 25 9 34 73.5% 23 7 30 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2016 7 9 16 43.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2020 18 5 23 78.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
27 2017 16 15 31 51.6% 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2021 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2018 13 13 26 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2022 11 7 18 61.1% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — —
29 2019 17 17 34 50.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 2023 6 9 15 40.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 2020 10 11 21 47.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2021 11 16 27 40.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 6 10 16 37.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 7 12 19 36.8% 15 6 21 71.4% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 8 11 19 42.1% 3 7 10 30.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 3 9 12 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 114 148 262 43.5% 82 82 164 50.0% 34 37 71 47.9% — 161 115 276 58.3% 161 74 235 68.5% 15 18 33 45.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 489/498 of Jan-Lennard Struff's and 539/544 of Dominic Thiem's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jan-Lennard Struff Dominic Thiem
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 4/4 4.0 2.8 48.1% 75.6% 37.4% 48.4% 86.1% 55.7% 33.4%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 3/3 5.0 3.0 61.3% 75.2% 45.6% 73.5% 38.9% 63.6% 28.9%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 6/6 5.8 2.5 54.7% 78.5% 62.7% 58.8% 39.6% 70.9% 38.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 44/45 4.4 2.9 57.3% 72.6% 50.7% 58.4% 41.6% 62.9% 37.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 62/62 5.9 2.3 56.6% 74.8% 56.2% 58.9% 35.8% 66.5% 37.1%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 80/82 5.9 2.9 61.4% 74.3% 54.1% 56.1% 40.5% 66.4% 37.4%
23 2013 13/13 6.5 4.1 61.6% 71.3% 49.5% 45.8% 36.0% 62.6% 37.0% 2017 74/74 6.1 3.1 58.8% 75.2% 52.6% 61.5% 41.3% 65.9% 38.5%
24 2014 32/32 6.2 2.3 58.5% 73.9% 51.7% 59.7% 39.0% 64.5% 35.9% 2018 70/71 7.3 3.5 58.8% 75.9% 53.3% 63.4% 39.3% 66.5% 38.4%
25 2015 22/22 9.3 4.8 59.2% 75.0% 45.5% 55.1% 37.8% 62.7% 32.6% 2019 64/65 4.8 2.1 65.8% 73.6% 56.2% 60.7% 45.4% 67.6% 38.0%
26 2016 28/29 7.2 4.5 52.7% 76.8% 50.3% 54.3% 39.2% 64.3% 36.3% 2020 31/31 7.1 2.8 63.4% 74.0% 53.5% 64.3% 43.8% 66.4% 38.0%
27 2017 55/55 8.3 4.3 53.2% 77.9% 50.3% 63.5% 39.5% 65.0% 34.8% 2021 16/16 4.6 2.6 63.9% 72.8% 54.3% 66.1% 46.9% 66.2% 36.4%
28 2018 47/47 10.3 4.3 56.2% 76.6% 48.5% 58.8% 46.1% 64.2% 35.2% 2022 34/34 4.3 2.2 63.3% 68.8% 52.8% 50.6% 35.6% 63.3% 36.5%
29 2019 61/61 11.0 2.8 55.8% 79.2% 51.8% 65.6% 39.6% 67.3% 36.4% 2023 41/41 5.4 2.9 60.8% 72.2% 52.2% 61.4% 33.1% 64.3% 34.1%
30 2020 25/25 8.9 2.9 55.4% 75.8% 47.9% 64.2% 32.8% 63.3% 37.5% 2024 10/10 5.9 3.3 58.0% 67.4% 53.0% 48.4% 38.6% 61.4% 27.8%
31 2021 47/50 9.2 4.0 55.5% 74.0% 47.9% 55.8% 33.9% 62.4% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 13/13 10.5 3.8 57.3% 75.3% 49.0% 55.4% 34.9% 64.1% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 37/37 9.7 3.6 58.6% 75.2% 50.5% 64.9% 44.3% 65.2% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 46/49 10.0 4.4 57.9% 77.6% 52.3% 65.0% 35.8% 66.9% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 34/35 9.4 3.5 58.6% 74.1% 49.2% 50.2% 30.1% 63.6% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 29/30 11.1 4.2 57.7% 72.9% 48.8% 62.0% 35.6% 62.8% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 489/498 9.3 3.8 56.6% 76.0% 49.8% 60.0% 38.1% 64.6% 35.6% — 539/544 5.7 2.8 60.4% 73.8% 53.6% 59.6% 40.4% 65.7% 37.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jan-Lennard Struff Dominic Thiem
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1491 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1496 112.5 -2.63 -3.33 0.753 45.1% +32 — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.02
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1487 106.1 +0.37 -3.45 0.794 48.0% — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 1–1 — +0.16
19 2009 1452 96.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1580 124.6 +2.00 -0.38 1.319 54.2% -19 -9 — 64.3% +1.29 1–1 0–1 — +0.35
20 2010 1437 107.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1853 150.8 -0.10 +1.26 1.001 49.9% -30 -16 — 50.0% -0.09 8–8 (50%) 9–6 (60%) 104.7 -1.38
21 2011 1417 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1892 154.0 +1.96 +1.24 1.108 51.3% -65 +157 -301 51.8% +0.13 10–9 (53%) 17–24 (41%) 97.2 +0.34
22 2012 1380 96.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 2006 168.6 +3.18 +1.63 1.114 51.5% -61 +166 -227 63.5% +0.71 21–3 (88%) 20–14 (59%) 118.6 -0.64
23 2013 1586 121.5 -1.23 +0.31 0.991 49.6% -69 -29 +15 38.9% -0.39 1–2 (33%) 1–7 (13%) 94.5 +0.50 2017 1959 167.8 +2.96 +2.51 1.131 52.0% -82 +337 -151 63.7% +0.80 7–12 (37%) 14–14 (50%) 93.6 +0.76
24 2014 1722 139.8 +0.16 -0.05 1.012 50.3% -12 -77 -156 40.3% -0.42 7–3 (70%) 3–8 (27%) 103.7 -0.72 2018 2067 169.1 +3.22 +2.98 1.147 52.2% -45 +195 -279 66.7% +0.99 14–5 (74%) 17–14 (55%) 103.1 +0.03
25 2015 1625 133.3 -1.42 -2.36 0.872 47.8% +51 -34 -85 30.6% -0.89 4–8 (33%) 6–12 (33%) 94.6 -0.45 2019 2144 172.9 +3.94 +3.40 1.174 52.5% -34 +136 — 65.6% +0.78 14–3 (82%) 16–12 (57%) 111.2 -1.32
26 2016 1784 143.3 +0.54 +0.57 1.018 50.3% +5 -104 -264 42.7% -0.23 4–8 (33%) 8–5 (62%) 101.5 -0.92 2020 2202 171.1 +4.24 +2.58 1.132 52.4% +10 +19 — 69.1% +1.14 7–3 (70%) 15–9 (63%) 102.9 -2.09
27 2017 1856 152.0 +1.05 -0.70 0.994 50.1% -7 -109 -333 47.3% -0.08 8–8 (50%) 11–18 (38%) 97.7 -1.13 2021 2015 141.5 +1.76 +0.56 1.075 51.5% +142 +122 — 52.3% +0.34 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 97.8 +0.26
28 2018 1857 148.2 +0.47 -0.42 0.985 49.9% -17 -133 -246 49.6% -0.05 9–10 (47%) 15–14 (52%) 100.8 -0.96 2022 1908 145.5 +0.24 +0.10 0.994 49.8% +149 +46 — 47.6% -0.26 10–5 (67%) 14–4 (78%) 103.9 -2.20
29 2019 1884 157.4 +2.72 +1.70 1.113 51.5% -64 +3 -176 54.2% +0.38 10–10 (50%) 13–15 (46%) 99.8 -2.42 2023 1800 137.0 -0.18 -1.41 0.957 49.4% +72 +55 — 47.5% -0.20 8–9 (47%) 10–10 (50%) 96.8 -1.03
30 2020 1821 155.2 +0.74 +0.67 1.021 50.2% +13 -16 — 47.0% -0.03 3–5 (38%) 4–7 (36%) 97.0 -1.42 2024 1628 110.1 -2.09 -4.22 0.720 45.2% +169 +71 — 19.2% -1.54 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.8 -0.23
31 2021 1766 144.6 -0.12 -0.04 0.974 49.4% -30 +102 -91 47.6% -0.24 6–10 (38%) 12–11 (52%) 95.8 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1677 122.0 +0.37 -2.56 0.912 48.2% -3 — -65 33.3% -0.61 2–4 (33%) 1–7 (13%) 93.2 -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1807 145.1 +1.27 -0.07 1.005 50.1% -83 +104 -90 51.6% +0.11 10–8 (56%) 11–11 (50%) 103.8 -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1883 151.8 +3.06 +1.41 1.121 51.7% -174 +103 -53 58.6% +0.42 8–10 (44%) 25–16 (61%) 105.0 -2.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1823 139.7 -0.04 -0.88 0.935 48.5% -52 +32 -3 42.1% -0.60 5–4 (56%) 7–10 (41%) 101.1 -2.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 1787 129.2 -0.48 -1.25 0.918 48.8% -127 +10 +129 46.6% -0.41 7–7 (50%) 10–9 (53%) 99.9 -1.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2001 149.8 +0.84 -0.02 1.004 50.0% -39 -3 -93 47.3% -0.12 84–97 (46%) 127–150 (46%) 98.0 -2.98 — 2241 165.8 +2.25 +1.56 1.084 51.3% -20 +139 -230 58.6% +0.47 105–65 (62%) 138–117 (54%) 106.3 -1.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.