H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jan-Lennard Struff vs Dominic Thiem H2H: 1-3
Dominic Thiem holds a 3–1 lead over Jan-Lennard Struff in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Dominic Thiem leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Dominic Thiem won the 2018 St. Petersburg fourth round 7-6(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 36
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 32
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2018* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Dominic Thiem | 7-6(4) 6-4 | Jan-Lennard Struff | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2017* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Dominic Thiem | 4-6 6-4 6-4 6-3 | Jan-Lennard Struff | Match data |
| Apr 12, 2016* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Dominic Thiem | 1-6 6-3 6-4 | Jan-Lennard Struff | Match data |
| Jan 14, 2015* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jan-Lennard Struff | 6-7(6) 6-4 6-3 | Dominic Thiem | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Lennard Struff | #41 | #21 | 1,628 | 2,001 | 225 | 261 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Dominic Thiem | #1,174 | #3 | 9,125 | 2,241 | 337 | 207 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan-Lennard Struff | Dominic Thiem | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #638 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #139 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #39 | 1,848 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,889 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #8 | 2,015 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #107 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #5 | 1,958 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2014 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #59 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #8 | 2,064 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 2015 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #107 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 48–17 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,145 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 2016 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #63 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 24–7 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,200 | 1 | 17 |
| 27 | 2017 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #53 | 1,855 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #15 | 2,014 | 1 | 17 |
| 28 | 2018 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,907 | 1 | 17 |
| 29 | 2019 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #35 | 1,884 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #98 | 1,799 | 1 | 17 |
| 30 | 2020 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #36 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #524 | 1,627 | 1 | 17 |
| 31 | 2021 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #25 | 1,805 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,868 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2026 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #41 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |