H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Jan-Lennard Struff vs Pablo Cuevas H2H: 2-0
Jan-Lennard Struff holds a 2–0 lead over Pablo Cuevas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jan-Lennard Struff leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jan-Lennard Struff won the 2017 Vienna third round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 36
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
URU
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2017* | Vienna | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Jan-Lennard Struff | 7-5 6-1 | Pablo Cuevas | Match data |
| Aug 23, 2017* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jan-Lennard Struff | 7-6(2) 7-5 | Pablo Cuevas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Lennard Struff | #41 | #21 | 1,628 | 2,001 | 225 | 261 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Pablo Cuevas | #841 | #19 | 1,865 | 1,960 | 211 | 212 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan-Lennard Struff | Pablo Cuevas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #142 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #107 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #50 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #59 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #107 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #142 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #63 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2017 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #53 | 1,855 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2019 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #35 | 1,884 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #40 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2020 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #36 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2021 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #32 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #88 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2023 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #25 | 1,805 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #45 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | 2024 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,868 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #67 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | 2025 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #97 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | 2026 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #41 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #269 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 |