H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jan-Lennard Struff vs Pedro Cachin H2H: 2-0
Jan-Lennard Struff holds a 2–0 lead over Pedro Cachin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jan-Lennard Struff leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Jan-Lennard Struff won the 2024 Rome Masters first round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 36
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Argentina
Age 31
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2024* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Clay | Jan-Lennard Struff | 6-4 6-4 | Pedro Cachin | Match data |
| May 3, 2023* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Jan-Lennard Struff | 7-6(7) 6-7(7) 6-3 | Pedro Cachin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Lennard Struff | #41 | #21 | 1,628 | 2,001 | 225 | 261 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Pedro Cachin | #686 | #48 | 937 | 1,744 | 25 | 46 | 35.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan-Lennard Struff | Pedro Cachin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #491 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #107 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #59 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #363 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #107 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #370 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #63 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2017 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #53 | 1,855 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #57 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #70 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2019 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #35 | 1,884 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 2–15 | 11.8% | #286 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2020 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #36 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2021 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #25 | 1,805 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,868 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2026 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #41 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |