H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jan-Lennard Struff vs Ruben Bemelmans H2H: 0-1
Ruben Bemelmans holds a 1–0 lead over Jan-Lennard Struff in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ruben Bemelmans leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ruben Bemelmans won the 2016 Montpellier fourth round 6-4 6-7(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 36
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 38
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2016* | Montpellier | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Ruben Bemelmans | 6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | Jan-Lennard Struff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Lennard Struff | #41 | #21 | 1,628 | 2,001 | 225 | 261 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ruben Bemelmans | #1,092 | #84 | 628 | 1,755 | 23 | 49 | 31.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan-Lennard Struff | Ruben Bemelmans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #178 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #107 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #59 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #111 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #107 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #148 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #63 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2017 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #53 | 1,855 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #108 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #35 | 1,884 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #36 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #117 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #260 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #25 | 1,805 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,868 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2026 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #41 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |