H2H data updated: 2026-10-18 00:00 UTC

Jan-Michael Gambill vs Martin Lee H2H: 1-0

Jan-Michael Gambill holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Lee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan-Michael Gambill leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jan-Michael Gambill won the 2000 Eastbourne Open round of 32 6-3 6-3.

USA Age 49 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
GBR Age 48 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jan-Michael Gambill #62 6-3 6-3 Martin Lee #264 Match data Jun 22, 2000* R32 Eastbourne Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jan-Michael Gambill #1,352 #14 1,655 1,949 201 191 51.3% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Martin Lee #1,474 #94 429 1,594 19 42 31.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jan-Michael Gambill Martin Lee
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1995 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0 1996 0–2 0.0% #618 1,484 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1997 3–3 50.0% #265 1,508 0 0
20 1997 3–5 37.5% #186 1,520 0 0 1998 0–4 0.0% #334 1,449 0 0
21 1998 31–23 57.4% #38 1,754 0 0 1999 1–2 33.3% #273 1,454 0 0
22 1999 25–25 50.0% #58 1,762 0 1 2000 1–4 20.0% #177 1,465 0 0
23 2000 33–26 55.9% #33 1,818 0 1 2001 9–10 47.4% #105 1,547 0 0
24 2001 35–22 61.4% #21 1,759 0 2 2002 4–14 22.2% #203 1,506 0 0
25 2002 28–26 51.9% #42 1,756 0 2 2003 0–1 0.0% #599 1,494 0 0
26 2003 22–25 46.8% #51 1,643 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 2004 18–25 41.9% #95 1,595 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 2005 5–10 33.3% #191 1,558 0 3 2006 1–2 33.3% #304 1,488 0 0
29 2006 1–1 50.0% #687 1,568 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2007 0–2 0.0% #1107 1,504 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jan-Michael Gambill Martin Lee
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
20 1997 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1998 23 13 36 63.9% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1999 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 1999 20 15 35 57.1% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
23 2000 20 17 37 54.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2001 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — —
24 2001 29 13 42 69.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2002 2 7 9 22.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
25 2002 24 16 40 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2003 20 17 37 54.1% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 15 18 33 45.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 5 10 15 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2006 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 160 126 286 55.9% 10 32 42 23.8% 23 21 44 52.3% 8 12 20 40.0% — 3 13 16 18.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 15 23 38 39.5% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 105/109 of Jan-Michael Gambill's and 4/4 of Martin Lee's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jan-Michael Gambill Martin Lee
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/1 4.0 4.0 59.3% 56.3% 36.4% 52.9% 50.0% 48.1% 40.0%
26 2003 43/47 10.1 3.1 56.5% 75.0% 47.9% 60.7% 48.3% 63.4% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 43/43 11.7 3.1 59.1% 76.0% 47.7% 57.9% 38.7% 64.3% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 15/15 12.3 3.9 56.6% 76.7% 45.9% 58.6% 27.7% 63.3% 32.1% 2006 3/3 7.7 4.0 54.9% 68.1% 45.7% 51.1% 10.3% 57.6% 29.4%
29 2006 2/2 11.5 7.0 47.8% 73.2% 44.1% 59.7% 35.0% 57.0% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 2/2 9.5 5.5 58.7% 79.4% 39.2% 37.5% 20.8% 62.8% 26.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 105/392 11.1 3.4 57.5% 75.7% 47.3% 58.8% 40.7% 63.6% 34.6% — 4/61 6.8 4.0 56.0% 65.1% 43.3% 51.6% 20.2% 55.2% 32.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jan-Michael Gambill Martin Lee
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1995 1487 99.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.04 1996 1485 96.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.18
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1508 100.8 — — — — — — +109 47.1% -1.06 2–0 1–0 — +0.53
20 1997 1520 116.3 — — — — +18 — — 33.3% -1.17 1–0 3–1 (75%) — -0.59 1998 1450 98.2 — — — — — — +99 18.2% -2.09 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.52
21 1998 1755 144.7 — — — — +27 -222 -139 53.4% +0.32 13–4 (76%) 11–12 (48%) 111.1 +0.72 1999 1455 104.0 — — — — — — +71 40.0% -0.60 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.09
22 1999 1763 145.0 — — — — +37 -263 -154 51.2% +0.26 8–11 (42%) 10–9 (53%) 102.4 -2.53 2000 1466 101.3 — — — — — — +1 35.7% -1.29 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.31
23 2000 1819 143.8 — — — — -27 -296 -44 56.3% +0.60 10–10 (50%) 10–17 (37%) 96.8 -1.79 2001 1548 116.7 — — — — -53 — +48 45.8% -0.29 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.98
24 2001 1759 150.9 — — — — +67 -256 -39 61.9% +0.81 8–6 (57%) 11–10 (52%) 99.4 +0.99 2002 1507 113.1 — — — — -23 -15 +86 26.8% -1.78 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.1 +0.01
25 2002 1756 148.6 — — — — +48 -275 -49 51.9% +0.44 11–10 (52%) 11–14 (44%) 92.3 -0.54 2003 1495 102.6 +0.17 -4.75 0.771 44.4% — — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — +0.11
26 2003 1644 133.1 +0.95 -1.36 0.983 50.0% +72 -213 +27 48.2% +0.07 5–6 (45%) 9–9 (50%) 96.5 +1.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 1596 125.6 +0.40 -1.44 0.961 49.5% +33 -178 +70 44.1% -0.30 3–7 (30%) 13–11 (54%) 98.0 +1.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 1559 116.9 -1.32 -3.12 0.876 47.9% +9 — — 33.3% -0.92 2–2 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 101.5 +0.61 2006 1489 96.0 -1.53 -2.85 0.692 44.9% — — +66 37.5% -1.50 — 2–0 — +0.23
29 2006 1569 105.0 -1.55 +1.41 0.916 48.6% — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — +0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 1505 103.5 -0.27 -2.33 0.719 44.4% — — — 0.0% -1.75 — 0–1 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 1506 100.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1508 103.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1949 145.6 +0.33 -1.61 0.952 49.4% +35 -250 -44 51.3% +0.24 62–56 (53%) 82–87 (49%) 100.1 -0.01 — 1595 110.3 -1.11 -3.33 0.715 44.8% -35 -15 +67 35.7% -1.18 9–8 (53%) 12–10 (55%) 105.6 +3.97

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.