H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Jan-Michael Gambill vs Martin Lee H2H: 1-0
Jan-Michael Gambill holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Lee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jan-Michael Gambill leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jan-Michael Gambill won the 2000 Nottingham third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 48
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2000* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Jan-Michael Gambill | 6-3 6-3 | Martin Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Michael Gambill | #1,352 | #14 | 1,655 | 1,956 | 201 | 191 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Martin Lee | #1,474 | #94 | 429 | 1,594 | 19 | 42 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan-Michael Gambill | Martin Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #618 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #265 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #186 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #334 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #273 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #33 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #105 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #203 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #599 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,642 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #304 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #687 | 1,567 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,503 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |