H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Jan-Michael Gambill vs Ramon Delgado H2H: 0-1
Ramon Delgado holds a 1–0 lead over Jan-Michael Gambill in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ramon Delgado leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ramon Delgado won the 2000 Orlando third round 5-7 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
PAR
Age 49
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2000* | Orlando | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ramon Delgado | 5-7 7-5 6-4 | Jan-Michael Gambill | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan-Michael Gambill | #1,352 | #14 | 1,655 | 1,956 | 201 | 191 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Ramon Delgado | #518 | #52 | 829 | 1,712 | 69 | 102 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan-Michael Gambill | Ramon Delgado | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #289 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #186 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #114 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #149 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #33 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #257 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #21 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #92 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #42 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #123 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #51 | 1,642 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #200 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #95 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #227 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,557 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #687 | 1,567 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #156 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1107 | 1,503 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #194 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |